Examples of the argument from gullibility to plagiarized schlock

[Stubble]

I cannot stop laughing! Can we agree that the book has some flaws the author should be aware of?

It is so very tempting to link the author to this thread, knowing it would make is blood boil he was so very wrong and is being so thoroughly mocked.

He also does the stationmaster Zabecki took a photograph of Treblinka during the revolt with citation to Zabecki's Polish memoirs directly.

But those dead horses are still recovering from their most recent beatings.

I paid money for Flaws's book, read it, and got some good info and sources from it, so it's not a total loss. This thread is clearly labeled hyperbolic insults.

Oh, I get it Pilgrim, I still can't stop laughing about the Flaws. It's comedy gold Sir.

[Nessie]

Historians make mistakes. Holocaust revisionists make many more.

[pilgrimofdark]

Dick de Mildt, in a mass conspiracy with Kluwer Law International and Martinus Nijhoff Publishers to write, edit, and publish a book.

This paroxysm of shrieking will set you back $312 for the PDF version.

Wirth, a man with ample experience in the field of mass gassings through his work at the 'mercy killing' centres in Germany, decided, after some experimenting, to apply the exhaust fumes of a diesel engine for his killing purposes. As we saw, this was the method used by the gas van units of the Einsatzgruppen and by Wirth's colleague Herbert Lange at the Chelmno centre.

- Mildt, Dick de. In the Name of the People: Perpetrators of Genocide in the Reflection of Their Post-War Prosecution in West Germany the “Euthanasia” and “Aktion Reinhard” Trial Cases. p. 240.

De Mildt has worked out to his satisfaction that the Holocaust at Chelmno and the Action Reinhardt camps was primarily perpetrated through the use of diesel exhaust fumes, a non-homicidal gas.

He is confident diesel exhaust is a tested, verified, and generally reliable way to kill millions of people, and that the Nazis decided on it after numerous experimentation phases.

A sixth grader could tell him why this is dumb. If he does not see why that is wrong on so many levels, he is worse than a phlogistonist.

When a so-called Holocaustophiliac, really untrained Freudian psychoanalyst, succeeds in providing a fake history, they are not a genuine historian, and this causes them to be celebrated and charge $312 for a book.

That means the so-called Holocaustophiliac trope of suggesting the Holocaust was all down to diesel gassings is incorrect.

de Mildt is determined to rely on the logical fallacy of argument from gullibility. He can work out, from a huge number of judicial decisions, how it was possible for millions of people to have been gassed with diesel engines. He is convinced by "exterminationist" interpretations. Therefore, he illogically concludes that means there were homicidal diesel engines at Chelmno and every AR camp.

AI Overview: The fallacy of argument from gullibility to plagiarized schlock argues that a claim must be true simply because a person (often the arguer themselves) is willing to believe it, or because it would be nice if it were true. Accepting a claim solely because one is personally inclined to believe it is a fallacy.

What is the evidential value of de Mildt's willingness to believe in "The Holocaust by Stinky Diesel Fumes"? His gullibility is not evidence, yet his methodology relies on it, which is a logical fallacy. Maybe he could explain the evidential value of his fanatical conviction upon which he bases the entire historical narrative in his $312 book.

Because "the Holocaust" is a term which lacks any analytical value but has religious connotations, de Mildt can only be termed a sycophantic zealot. He should consider seeing a Freudian psychoanalyst to treat him for his paranoid conspiracy theorizing, possibly one specializing in Self-Defeating Personality Disorder, a common affliction among those who rely on the fallacy of argument from gullibility.

This midwit's methodology is appalling. I have never called de Mildt a midwit. That is a lie that you just made up. Some people claim this term is hate speech and that people who engage in hate speech should be investigated by the police and lose their jobs. I disagree with that. This kind of bullying shouldn't be allowed.

My descriptive term for this is lying, and I have used my unlicensed and untrained lack of knowledge and experience in Freudian psychoanalysis to diagnose him with Penis Envy. I am certainly not projecting which is something I would never do. I know this because I am better than him, and I know that because I do not use logical fallacies.

Disclaimer: the point of this thread is to highlight mistakes/misconceptions of mainstream works with the same lack of charity, hyperbolic insults, and non sequitor mischaracterizations as directed at revisionist writings. The citations are real, the tone is satirical. If it looks unhinged, insane, and paranoid -- that's because it is. Some people who take this thread way too seriously have denounced such argumentation style as being something only losers would use.

[Nessie]

Both historians and revisionists have made the mistake of thinking that diesel was the engine type claimed by all the eyewitnesses.

[pilgrimofdark]

Abakumov's SMERSH conducts the only investigation of Treblinka by trained, experienced, law enforcement agents:

Thus, in the Treblinka "death camp" up to five million Jews, brought there by the Germans from France, Belgium, Holland and other European countries they occupied, were exterminated in various ways.

- Special message No. 8186/SO

You guys have worked out to your satisfaction that 5 million Jews were killed at Treblinka, based on a Ukrainian guard telling you 2 million. Combined with 4 million at Auschwitz and 1.5 million at Majdanek, SMERSH has worked out exactly how 6 million Jews died utilizing their training and law enforcement experience.

You guys and SMERSH are censoring and bullying me. This is a textbook conspiracy theory that you guys and SMERSH believe, and it's not surprising you've censored me. I didn't get therapy for Self-Defeating Personality Disorder just to be bullied by you guys.

Rejecting Wiernik's book stating "approximately 3.5 million corpses," Bronia Teperman's account that Germans shot off a salvo "in honor of the extermination of 3.5 million Jews," and Tanhum Grinberg's "rough estimate" of 3.5 million people, SMERSH has discovered a new high count of victims at Treblinka during the Soviet Union's only investigation of the camp conducted by a trained law enforcement agency.

I've diagnosed SMERSH and you guys with Paranoid Personality Disorder. You guys need to stop censoring me. SMERSH's nonstop campaign of exaggerating death counts only confirms your methodology is based on logical fallacies. My assessment isn't an insult -- it's a descriptive framework for you guys who are working with SMERSH to bully me. You guys keep following me around the internet and in real life. Stop bullying me and trying to censor me.

SMERSH relies on the logical fallacy of the argument from gullibility, believing their own lies. SMERSH's conspiracy brain allows them to work out to their satisfaction that 5 million Jews were killed at Treblinka based on no witness testimony at all mentioning that figure. You guys are deep in the conspiracy brain and can only be described as suffering from clinical fanaticism.

SMERSH's paranoia makes them insane as you guys engage in a vast, secret plan dedicated to censoring me. Why are you guys allowed to bully? Your methodology is flawed.

You guys and SMERSH are involved in a plot with elderly Hitler worshippers, and you are out to misrepresent me. You guys are truly paranoid and SMERSH is out to get me.

Confirmation of 5 million Jewish victims is the consequence of SMERSH's relevant training and experience in law enforcement. SMERSH knows what they are doing, and this is not their first day on the job.

Disclaimer: the point of this thread is to highlight mistakes/misconceptions of mainstream works with the same lack of charity, hyperbolic insults, and non sequitor mischaracterizations as directed at revisionist writings. The citations are real, the tone is satirical. If it looks unhinged, insane, and paranoid -- that's because it is. Some people who take this thread way too seriously have denounced such argumentation style as being something only losers would use.

[pilgrimofdark]

SMERSH, with relevant law enforcement training and experience:

Thus, the investigation has established that in the Treblinka camp / both of its branches / seven million Jews, Poles and Gypsies brought here by the Germans from various European countries they occupied were exterminated in various ways.

- Special note No. 4/6451

As the only law enforcement agency with relevant training and experience to investigate the Treblinka crime scene, SMERSH has worked out to its satisfaction that 7 million people were killed at the camp.

• 7 million at Treblinka
• + 1.5 million at Majdanek
• + 4 million at Auschwitz
• = 6 million

SMERSH has worked out to its satisfaction that this number adds up to exactly 6 million, 5.1 million, and 4.2 million.

This is the consequence of a lot of relevant training and experience, and anyone who disagrees with SMERSH is engaging in a logical fallacy and lacking a methodology.

SMERSH, with their relevant training and expertise, are far more likely to come to a correct conclusion than any other investigators.

Think about your own job and what would happen if you tried to critique someone with lots of training or expertise.

This is deliberate censorship, as anti-SMERSHites are reluctant to discuss the consequences of SMERSH's abundance of relevant training and expertise. Those with relevent qualifications and experience need to accept SMERSH is less likely to make mistakes. Anti-SMERSHites need a bit more self-awareness.

Being against SMERSH is evidence someone is a holier-than-thou Anti-SMERSHite. They know my point about SMERSH's training and experience is valid, so they resort to bullying me.

Not believing that SMERSH has the relevant training and expertise in law enforcement to investigate the Treblinka camp crime scene is a logical fallacy. The main strengths with SMERSH investigation, that as yet have not been banned, are their abundance of relevant training and experience, which is less likely to cause them to make mistakes. There is a distinct overconfidence amongst the anti-SMERSHites, that they can successfully review and assess SMERSH expert produced evidence.

Disclaimer: the point of this thread is to highlight mistakes/misconceptions of mainstream works with the same lack of charity, hyperbolic insults, and non sequitor mischaracterizations as directed at revisionist writings. The citations are real, the tone is satirical. If it looks unhinged, insane, and paranoid -- that's because it is. Some people who take this thread way too seriously have denounced such argumentation style as being something only losers would use.

[Stubble]

I look forward to your book of this title and I hope to see it in the Holocaust Handbook series! You are batting it out of the frigging park Pilgrim!

[pilgrimofdark]

I look forward to your book of this title and I hope to see it in the Holocaust Handbook series! You are batting it out of the frigging park Pilgrim!

I promise I'm also working on real stuff. This thread just makes me laugh. I'm trying to make each one the stupidest yet. Speaking of which...

The Soviet Extraordinary State Commission:

On the basis of the investigation carried out, the Extraordinary State Commission established that this monstrous crime – the extermination of US and British citizens – was committed by the commandant of the Treblinka camp, Baron van Eupen, the head of the camp, Oberscharführer Franz, his assistant...

- Draft report of the Extraordinary State Commission for the Establishment and Investigation of the Crimes of the Nazi Invaders and Their Accomplices "On the Murder by the Germans in Treblinka Concentration Camp No. 2 in Poland of Citizens of the United States of America, Great Britain, the USSR, Poland, France, Czechoslovakia, Bulgaria, and Other Countries" (December 1, 1944) GARF P-7021-115-9 pp. 2-11 (Draft: pp. 84-91).

The ESC has worked out to their satisfaction that Theodor van Eupen was commandant of Treblinka II and personally gassed over 1,000 US and British citizens. Their flawed methodology has led them to a frankly idiotic conclusion completely divorced from reality.

The ESC makes such statements in their reports because they suffer from Schizotypal personality disorder. This isn't a clinical diagnosis, but a framework for evaluating their flawed methodology. I know they suffer from Schizotypal personality disorder, because I get treatment for it three times a month.

They were easily duped by 8 eyewitnesses who all confirmed seeing American and British citizens specifically singled out in Warsaw, then spoke to them at Treblinka, and found their personal belongings like American passports and British university diplomas. The ESC's methodology is lacking, and they rely on logical fallacies to become gullible to plagiarized schlock.

This is textbook Delirium due to multiple etiologies. I'm not trained to diagnosis this, but I know it when I see it because I'm in a court-ordered treatment program. Numerous people in my weekly group therapy sessions also have Delirium due to multiple etiologies.

What is the evidential value of the Soviet Union's appalling methodology? They cling to their flawed methodology based on logical fallacies.

Because they suffer from Nightmare disorder, they have lied and made this up. I was institutionalized for 3 years for Nightmare disorder, so I am qualified to identify it and diagnose other people with it, and the Extraordinary State Commission definitely has it (not to be taken as an official diagnosis).

We have tons of testimony that van Eupen was gassing British and American citizens at Treblinka. Is the ESC really this pathetic? If you can't identify an American citizen who was demonstrably deported to Treblinka as having survived after being sent to the camp, then these British and American citizens were gassed by van Eupen at Treblinka.

The ESC definitely suffers from Exhibitionistic disorder, which I recently graduated from a treatment program to overcome and have been sober for 2 1/2 weeks. I can readily identify it in others and am confident in my diagnosis that they have Exhibitionistic disorder. This isn't an insult or a diagnosis, but my paradigm for how I view their methodology.

This causes them to rely on logical fallacies like believing the 8 witnesses who saw notices posted all over Warsaw directing American and British citizens to prison and deportation. The ESC needs to get over themselves. For fuck's sake. This is midwittery.

It's obvious they suffer from Tardive akathisia, which is why they're always swearing and insulting me. They shouldn't be allowed to bully or censor me. They are lying, misrepresenting, deluded, and ignorant. As someone with Tardive akathisia who has not relapsed for nearly 3 days, I can easily diagnose the Soviets with it.

Disclaimer: the point of this thread is to highlight mistakes/misconceptions of mainstream works with the same lack of charity, hyperbolic insults, and non sequitor mischaracterizations as directed at revisionist writings. The citations are real, the tone is satirical. If it looks unhinged, insane, and paranoid -- that's because it is. Some people who take this thread way too seriously have denounced such argumentation style as being something only losers would use.

[Stubble]

Dude, this is book worthy, even if it ends up being a comic book like 'Tales of the Holihoax'.

You aren't the only one who can't stop laughing, I'm over here rolling man! This is solid gold!

[TlsMS93]

Nessie failed to add anything about those revisionist “errors”.

Lack of holes in the Birkenau kremas.
Poland and the USSR acted in common agreement in the post-war period.
Fat did not replace fuel.

[Nessie]

Nessie failed to add anything about those revisionist “errors”.

This thread is trying to parody my criticism of revisionist methodology. By doing so, it further proves how flawed revisionist methodology is. Pilgromofdark is unable to explain and support revisionist methodology.

Lack of holes in the Birkenau kremas.

There is no lack of holes. There is physical, photographic and eyewitness corroborating evidence to prove holes. Revisionists just dispute that evidence, rather than producing evidence to prove no holes. That they are unable to evidence what happened and instead rely on arguing against other evidence, is one of the flaws in their methodology.

Poland and the USSR acted in common agreement in the post-war period.

That is a chronological failure that ignores the wartime Polish Government in Exile, which was responsible for the vast majority of reports of death camps, did not work in conjunction with the Soviets and that by the 1980s, it was the rebellion in Poland that precipitated the collapse of communism and the Soviet Union. It ignores the many Poles who hated the Soviets, many who lived in exile, and the collapse of the Katyn hoax. It ignores the Soviets did little to promote the Holocaust, whereas the Poles did a lot. You would think the Soviets would want to run a Soviet hoax, since whilst they could act in common agreement, there was a lot of mistrust between them.

Fat did not replace fuel.

Human fat burns, it acts as a fuel. The pyres at the AR camps worked in the same way the pyres at Dresden and Ohrdruf worked, but on a much larger scale.

[pilgrimofdark]

Michael S. Bryant, suffering from psychogenic dissociative disorder as he bullies me:

Wirth also introduced an innovation in the killing technology, inspired by his work with the euthanasia program. He rejected bottled carbon monoxide in favor of using a diesel engine as a poison gas generator, thereby splicing Lange’s gas van with the stationary gas chamber of the euthanasia centers.

- Eyewitness to Genocide: The Operation Reinhard Death Camp Trials, 1955–1966. p. 4

Censoring and bullying me, Bryant has victimized me by throwing insults like "using a diesel engine" when writing about the history of the AR camps.

He has worked out to his satisfaction that he can shamelessly lie to his readers, thereby making me a victim of his bullying.

He is lying, misrepresenting, deluded, ignorant, and suffers from Problems related to unwanted pregnancy. There is no other explanation for how he can bully me by writing a book.

He engages in a mass conspiracy with the University of Tennessee Press to research, write, edit, and publish a book. He engages in a further mass conspiracy to offer the book for sale to the public.

I refuse to admit that I voluntarily read his book after voluntarily paying for it. I have no agency over my own life and actions. You guys refuse to acknowledge that I am being victimized and insulted by him, and you won't protect me from his insults.

I can not simply choose to stop reading the book, and am compelled to continue to engage with the book, which only gives him more opportunities to hurt my feelings. He refuses to discuss the topics I want him to write about, which shows how deep he is in Premenstrual dysphoric disorder.

I emailed him 3,700 times to try to get him to comply with my order that his book discuss Trawniki and Poniatowa. The fact that he refuses to stop resisting my attempts to force him to comply with my orders is quite the double standard. By writing a book about what he wanted to write about and not what I want him to write about, he is a hypocrite and a censor. The fact that he is unable to provide a revised version of his 2014 book based on what I have ordered him to do is evidence his methodology is flawed.

I have the relevant training and experience to demand people on the internet stop resisting and comply with my orders. That they refuse to do is is evidence of their geometric hallucination disorder. It is bullying.

Everyone refuses to stop Bryant from bullying me? That is evidence they also suffer from Reactive attachment disorder.

You guys just allow him to bully me, after I've been nothing but respectful. Yes, one time I poked a little fun and called you pathetic, frankly idiotic midwit liars engaging in a paroxysm of shrieking and you guys need to get over yourselves for fuck's sake. But that hardly justifies you allowing Bryant to insult me. It's a double standard.

I haven't done anything but politely point out the Genito-pelvic pain disorder you guys clearly have. I have compassion and empathy for your psychological condition you can't control, yet I'm only met with insults and bullying. Please engage in some self-reflection.

Disclaimer: the point of this thread is to highlight mistakes/misconceptions of mainstream works with the same lack of charity, hyperbolic insults, and non sequitor mischaracterizations as directed at revisionist writings. The citations are real, the tone is satirical. If it looks unhinged, insane, and paranoid -- that's because it is. Some people who take this thread way too seriously have denounced such argumentation style as being something only losers would use.

[pilgrimofdark]

Archie bullies and censors me, as he downplays my traumatic experience and violates my human right to post on an internet forum:

Another point here: an accident is something that happens in a flash and that people don't anticipate. In that situation you expect the accounts to be fragmentary and often inaccurate.

I was a survivor of the car accident.

This is the testimony I gave as a witness in court. My testimony helped put 35 people in prison for 3-150 years.

Forty Days at Taco Bell

It happened on April 1, on Halloween, at the time of the Christmas market. I was kidnapped by the Verkehrskoordinationmeisters, who took me from my home at the dog walking park.

I was mercilessly beaten with 180 others to enter the Toyota Chrysler. There was barely enough room to stand. Some of us had to lie down on the floor.

"McDonalds breakfast drive-thru," we cried. But the Treiberscharfuhrers would only take us to Taco Bell, where we sat for 17 minutes in line before we were given crunchwrap supremes.

The next morning, 20 of the cars in our convoy were separated and sent to the gas station. It was at this moment that we knew we were the next to die.

At the gas station, the Tankwartfuhrers forced us out of the cars. Half of us had died from dysentery caused by the moldy cheesy double beef burritos they forced us to eat. None of us suspected we were going to die.

Above the gas station was a sign: "GO DOGS! $1 HOT DOGS!" But it was a lie. We never received hot dogs. We were only given gas station Viagra and it barely kept us alive.

At that moment, I heard a crash. A car had hit a Russian submarine. There were approximately 3.5 million corpses. That was the signal for our escape, which we had planned for the previous 3 days.

The crash lasted for over 2 months, day and night we heard the sound of the crash. I can hear it even now. Was it real? Or a dream? No, no. I can never forget it. It was all real. I will never forget a single detail.

[the witness begins crying]

I was the only survivor. I escaped into the strip mall parking lot, where I joined a Mothers Against Drunk Driving paramilitary group and vowed revenge on the Parkwächter.

[the witness continues crying]

I can only offer you my book, Angel at the Gas Station: The True Story of a Love That Survived, at a 12% discount if you buy 10 copies or more.

[Stubble]

^is source for this screed the Eichmann Trial?

This sounds like it came from the Eichmann Trial.

Oddly, it doesn't mention all of the shoes. A pile of shoes as tall as the statue of liberty. The only evidence that remained of the 3,500,000 victims of the trip to Taco Bell.

[pilgrimofdark]

^is source for this screed the Eichmann Trial?

This sounds like it came from the Eichmann Trial.

Oddly, it doesn't mention all of the shoes. A pile of shoes as tall as the statue of liberty. The only evidence that remained of the 3,500,000 victims of the trip to Taco Bell.

Twenty years after I testified, historians diagnosed me with psychogenic dissociative amnesia, which they say makes me more credible.

I was also involved in trials in 1988, 1994, and 2013, where I was able to identify twelve drivers of the car that crashed into the Russian tank.

I turned over the following photograph in 2015 showing the crash. The judges were very interested.



This helped put away an additional 85 people as accomplices to murder since they were present in the car when it crashed into the Lithuanian jet.

I now receive monthly compensation from the government for my injuries. A historian diagnosed me with 3.7% hearing loss in my right eye, for which I have vowed revenge.

My words are true. I can add nothing further.

/ signed /