Why do the reality deniers run from this simple question? [non-nefarious diggings]

[Stubble]

I don't know.

Thank you. That will suffice.

Stubble, I see that you had to ask bombsaway the same simple question 9 times before you got an answer. Good for you for sticking to your guns and demanding an answer.

I take it that you really believed that the question / answer was important, and that is why you repeatedly asked it.

One time I had to ask bombsaway a simple question 10 times before I got a simple answer. And that was unusual because he (and his ilk) usually outright refuse to answer, no matter how many times you ask.

The reality deniers repeatedly lie themselves into a corner, then cravenly refuse to answer any more questions once you have them there. It's shemeless and gutless behavior that is laughably called "debate" here at CODOH.

I've noticed the trick seems to be to divert conversation from the question rather than present an answer. If that doesn't work, eventually an answer will be given.

I don't like it.

[Keen]

Thank you. That will suffice.

Stubble, I see that you had to ask bombsaway the same simple question 9 times before you got an answer. Good for you for sticking to your guns and demanding an answer.

I take it that you really believed that the question / answer was important, and that is why you repeatedly asked it.

One time I had to ask bombsaway a simple question 10 times before I got a simple answer. And that was unusual because he (and his ilk) usually outright refuse to answer, no matter how many times you ask.

The reality deniers repeatedly lie themselves into a corner, then cravenly refuse to answer any more questions once you have them there. It's shemeless and gutless behavior that is laughably called "debate" here at CODOH.

I've noticed the trick seems to be to divert conversation from the question rather than present an answer. If that doesn't work, eventually an answer will be given.

Unless you're Nessie, then most likely no answer will ever be given.

Do you have a guess on how many times I'll have to ask bombsaway before he answers this queston:

viewtopic.php?p=17593#p17593

Edit: I added a second question for bombsaway.

[Stubble]

His answer will be to rebut;

'Asked and answered, I don't know'.

Alternatively he may try to pivot and say 'none, Kola only counted where human remains were found as mass graves'.

[Keen]

His answer will be to rebut;

'Asked and answered, I don't know'.

Alternatively he may try to pivot and say 'none, Kola only counted where human remains were found as mass graves'.

viewtopic.php?p=15856#p15856

[Keen]

And here is an apparent source for your initial quote, there:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... -camp.html

Notice that Auerbach says:

They dig, they search, pulling out bones and body parts. Maybe something could still be found...maybe a golden tooth?

Hmm, that sounds like actual human bones rather than bone fragments, doesn't it? If so, this is totally at odds with the official narrative, and takes your possible death toll down by a factor of 100 or more (given volume constraints). But does "bones and body parts" mean bone fragments, perhaps?

Nope -- doesn't seem like it, since they included a photo as well!


article-1355086-0D178B31000005DC-624_634x434.jpg

Thank you for proving that only scattered bones and property were found at Treblinka, bombsaway.

Are those human bones?

Where are the skulls to prove it?

[Hektor]

At first I thought this was a repetition of other threads, but Keen is actually raising a point that is often glossed over. The issue of "non-nefarious diggings" is something to keep in mind with the grave density discussions (where Holocaust promoters routinely assume every last inch of potential grave space must have been packed with bodies).

Usually the argument is that there are no corresponding mass graves as "The Nazis destroyed all the evidences". Additionally trinkets are shown, some times with human remains. That does of course not really prove what they assert, but most spectators really reflect on what they are told. They note that most authority figures profess the Holocaust and so do they.

[Nessie]

At first I thought this was a repetition of other threads, but Keen is actually raising a point that is often glossed over. The issue of "non-nefarious diggings" is something to keep in mind with the grave density discussions (where Holocaust promoters routinely assume every last inch of potential grave space must have been packed with bodies).

Usually the argument is that there are no corresponding mass graves as "The Nazis destroyed all the evidences". Additionally trinkets are shown, some times with human remains. That does of course not really prove what they assert, but most spectators really reflect on what they are told. They note that most authority figures profess the Holocaust and so do they.

In 1945 and in 2011, sections of the camp were excavated and property, rather than human remains, were found. That was also the case at the other AR camps and Chelmno. The property is evidence Jews were at the camp, they had property taken from them and that the Nazis subsequently discarded it, by burying it.

That is consistent with the evidenced narrative of the mass theft of property from Jews who were gassed, the sorting of that property, whereby not all would be considered to have any value, and the disposal of what was considered valueless. It is also consistent with the subsequent hiding of evidence, as the camp was closed down, planted over and buildings destroyed.

[Keen]

In 1945 and in 2011, sections of the camp were excavated

Is it - True. - or - False. - that; Non-nefarious diggings for such things as garbage pits, cellars, wells, latrines, septic pits, etc. - were dug at Treblinka II - ??

Nessie:

True

Is it - True. - or - False. - that; Archaeologists can easily distinguish a garbage pit from a mass grave?

Nessie:

True

The majority of the c850,000 are buried in a series of mass graves, some of which have been located by the 2011 geophysical survey, in the area of the camp that the 1945 survey described as the site of 2 hectares, up to 7m deep, containing cremated human remains. Some are also buried in the Lazarret section of the camp, where the 2011 survey also identified pits.

Nessie,

How many actual mass graves did CSC actually prove actually exist within the boundary of the Treblinka II camp?

An acceptable answer will be one of the following:

0., 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6., 7., 8., 9., 10., 11., 12., 13., 14., 15., or More than 15.

[Nessie]

In 1945 and in 2011, sections of the camp were excavated

Is it - True. - or - False. - that; Non-nefarious diggings for such things as garbage pits, cellars, wells, latrines, septic pits, etc. - were dug at Treblinka II - ??

Nessie:

True

Is it - True. - or - False. - that; Archaeologists can easily distinguish a garbage pit from a mass grave?

Nessie:

True

That is not the full answer. Why have you cut the rest? I said if the pit is excavated, it can be easily distinguished, but if it is not, then its contents cannot be definitively determined.

The majority of the c850,000 are buried in a series of mass graves, some of which have been located by the 2011 geophysical survey, in the area of the camp that the 1945 survey described as the site of 2 hectares, up to 7m deep, containing cremated human remains. Some are also buried in the Lazarret section of the camp, where the 2011 survey also identified pits.

Nessie,

How many actual mass graves did CSC actually prove actually exist within the boundary of the Treblinka II camp?

An acceptable answer will be one of the following:

0., 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6., 7., 8., 9., 10., 11., 12., 13., 14., 15., or More than 15.

Again, 11.

[Keen]

Is it - True. - or - False. - that; Archaeologists can easily distinguish a garbage pit from a mass grave?

Nessie:

True

That is not the full answer.

Then answer the question correctly.

An acceptable answer is either - Yes. - or - No.

Is it - True. - or - False. - that; Non-nefarious diggings for such things as garbage pits, cellars, wells, latrines, septic pits, etc. - were dug at Treblinka II - ??

Nessie:

True

Just to be clear Roberto, is your answer to the above question: - True. - ?

[Keen]

How many actual mass graves did CSC actually prove actually exist within the boundary of the Treblinka II camp?

An acceptable answer will be one of the following:

0., 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6., 7., 8., 9., 10., 11., 12., 13., 14., 15., or More than 15.

11.

Which 11?


CSC G50 = The H.A.H.C. "huge mass grave" #1/77

CSC G54 = The H.A.H.C. "huge mass grave" #2/78

CSC G53 = The H.A.H.C. "huge mass grave" #3/79

CSC G52 = The H.A.H.C. "huge mass grave" #4/80

CSC G51 = The H.A.H.C. "huge mass grave" #5/81

CSC F1 = The H.A.H.C. "huge mass grave" #6/82

CSC G44 = The H.A.H.C. "huge mass grave" #7/83

CSC G1 = The H.A.H.C. "huge mass grave" #8/84

CSC G4 = The H.A.H.C. "huge mass grave" #9/85

CSC G38 = The H.A.H.C. "huge mass grave" #10/86

CSC F16 = The H.A.H.C. "huge mass grave" #11/87

CSC F9 = The H.A.H.C. "huge mass grave" #12/88

CSC G29 = The H.A.H.C. "huge mass grave" #13/89

CSC G32 = The H.A.H.C. "huge mass grave" #14/90

CSC G36 = The H.A.H.C. "huge mass grave" #15/91

[Nessie]

Is it - True. - or - False. - that; Archaeologists can easily distinguish a garbage pit from a mass grave?

Nessie:

True

That is not the full answer.

Then answer the question correctly.

An acceptable answer is either - Yes. - or - No.

Is it - True. - or - False. - that; Non-nefarious diggings for such things as garbage pits, cellars, wells, latrines, septic pits, etc. - were dug at Treblinka II - ??

Nessie:

True

Just to be clear Roberto, is your answer to the above question: - True. - ?

Back to calling me Roberto, so no answers from me.

[Nessie]

How many actual mass graves did CSC actually prove actually exist within the boundary of the Treblinka II camp?

An acceptable answer will be one of the following:

0., 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6., 7., 8., 9., 10., 11., 12., 13., 14., 15., or More than 15.

11.

Which 11?

G32, G29, G1/G44, G4, G38, G36, G50, G51, G52, G53, G54.

[Keen]

That is not the full answer.

Then answer the question correctly.

An acceptable answer is either - Yes. - or - No.

Is it - True. - or - False. - that; Non-nefarious diggings for such things as garbage pits, cellars, wells, latrines, septic pits, etc. - were dug at Treblinka II - ??

Nessie:

True

Just to be clear Roberto, is your answer to the above question: - True. - ?

Back to calling me Roberto, so no answers from me.

Look at it run!

[Keen]

11.

Which 11?

G32, G29, G1/G44, G4, G38, G36, G50, G51, G52, G53, G54.

But notice that the tard listed 12 "huge mass graves," not 11.