Not Marian Olszuk, the only photo of Treblinka was by the stationmaster after the revolt. Produce the aerial pics please. As Treblinka was bombed by the Russians one should expect disturbed ground.
Not Marian Olszuk, the only photo of Treblinka was by the stationmaster after the revolt. Produce the aerial pics please. As Treblinka was bombed by the Russians one should expect disturbed ground.
http://www.whale.to/b/treblinka2.html
Typo on my part, the aerial photo, that you know about, is from 1944, before the Soviets arrived.the only photo of Treblinka was by the stationmaster after the revolt. Produce the aerial pics please. As Treblinka was bombed by the Russians one should expect disturbed ground.
Could be latrines. Perhaps the inmates eat too many beans.
"liquifying corpses"!
Let's discuss this alleged " ONE positive borehole."
You can also answer by giving the number allegedly buried in each one of the 33 alleged "huge mass graves."Nessie wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2024 8:30 amHow many people are buried at Belzec?Callafangers wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2024 7:58 pm ...
Thus, the ground disturbances identified align far more with the revisionist interpretation.
You can answer with a range.
Your refusal to answer my questions, is one of the reasons why I refuse to answer yours.Keen wrote: ↑Tue Oct 07, 2025 1:14 pmYou can also answer by giving the number allegedly buried in each one of the 33 alleged "huge mass graves."Nessie wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2024 8:30 amHow many people are buried at Belzec?Callafangers wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2024 7:58 pm ...
Thus, the ground disturbances identified align far more with the revisionist interpretation.
You can answer with a range.
Fill in the blanks Nessie:
1 - ?, 2 - ?, 3 - ?, 4 - ?, 5 - ?, 6 - ?, 7 - ?, 8 - ?, 9 -?, 10 - ?, 11 - ?, 12 - ?, 13 - ?, 14 - ?, 15 - ?, 16 - ?, 17 - ?, 18 - ?, 19 - ?, 20 - ?, 21 - ?, 22 - ?, 23 - ?, 24 - ?, 25 - ?, 26 -?, 27 - ?, 28 - ?, 29 - ?, 30 - ?, 31 - ?, 32 - ?, 33 - ?
And the other reasons are that you are a lying, cowardly cornered rat.Nessie wrote: ↑Wed Oct 08, 2025 6:33 amYour refusal to answer my questions, is one of the reasons why I refuse to answer yours.Keen wrote: ↑Tue Oct 07, 2025 1:14 pmYou can also answer by giving the number allegedly buried in each one of the 33 alleged "huge mass graves."
Fill in the blanks Nessie:
1 - ?, 2 - ?, 3 - ?, 4 - ?, 5 - ?, 6 - ?, 7 - ?, 8 - ?, 9 -?, 10 - ?, 11 - ?, 12 - ?, 13 - ?, 14 - ?, 15 - ?, 16 - ?, 17 - ?, 18 - ?, 19 - ?, 20 - ?, 21 - ?, 22 - ?, 23 - ?, 24 - ?, 25 - ?, 26 -?, 27 - ?, 28 - ?, 29 - ?, 30 - ?, 31 - ?, 32 - ?, 33 - ?
You've hit on a very important point here Archie, and that is Kola's use of the word "layers."
Notice the discrepancy between the two alleged descriptions of alleged "grave" #11.https://tomashov.org.il/wp-content/uplo ... 997-98.pdfGrave No. 11. A smaller grave than any hitherto discovered (with the exception of grave No.2), measures 11 m. x 9 m., located immediately adjaccnt to the NE comer of the monument/mausoleum. A few fragments of burnt human bones mixed with innumerable small pieces of carbobized wood were found at a depth of only 1.90 m.
Actually curioussoul, ALL of the asserted grave volume is conjectural, because no graves, mass or otherwise, have ever been proven to exist at Belzec.curioussoul wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2024 12:12 am Much of the asserted grave volume is simply conjectural.
Your "very logical explanation for the presence of mass graves" is nothing but conjecture.curioussoul wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2024 12:12 am In addition, there is a very logical explanation for the presence of mass graves
Well curioussoul, those who espouse the holocaust by train theory [the holocaust light crowd] allege tens of thousands of dead bodies also.curioussoul wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2024 12:17 amNonsense. There would have been tens of thousands of dead bodies...bombsaway wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2024 11:03 pmNeedless to say there hasn't been a response to most of my arguments, and it's now been 4 days since I raised my point about the ash layers, which has gone unanswered except for Nazgul who said they and the graves were the result of "bombing". This thread is about the "own goal" of the Kola study, yet there has been a refusal to actually grapple with what's in the study. My position is it is incompatible with revisionism, but compatible with orthodoxy. Once you start engaging with the actual study, and answering the kind of questions you have posed (how could this be? essentially) and I have answered, I think you'll see this to be the case.