Junk Folder for Derails

For more adversarial interactions
Locked
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 2824
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: Forensic Chemistry

Post by Nessie »

HansHill wrote: Mon Sep 29, 2025 3:00 pm "on their own"

Wrong.

No residues, plus no holes, plus no Kula Columns, plus impossible throughput, plus impossible cremation rates = very bad news for Nessie.

My condolences.
There is evidence of holes from photos of the roof, eyewitnesses and in the physical remains and for the Kula columns from eyewitnesses and a document.

That you think the process was impossible, is the argument from incredulity.

There are various explanations as to why the residue, where it can be measured, is lower than the delousing chambers. The only way to prove which chemist is correct, is to look for evidence of usage. The evidence is that the chambers were used for homicidal gassings. So-called revisionists fall apart into total disagreement, when they try to revise that history.
User avatar
Archie
Site Admin
Posts: 1114
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2024 6:54 am

Re: Forensic Chemistry

Post by Archie »

Nessie wrote: Mon Sep 29, 2025 3:12 pm
HansHill wrote: Mon Sep 29, 2025 3:00 pm "on their own"

Wrong.

No residues, plus no holes, plus no Kula Columns, plus impossible throughput, plus impossible cremation rates = very bad news for Nessie.

My condolences.
There is evidence of holes from photos of the roof, eyewitnesses and in the physical remains and for the Kula columns from eyewitnesses and a document.

That you think the process was impossible, is the argument from incredulity.

There are various explanations as to why the residue, where it can be measured, is lower than the delousing chambers. The only way to prove which chemist is correct, is to look for evidence of usage. The evidence is that the chambers were used for homicidal gassings. So-called revisionists fall apart into total disagreement, when they try to revise that history.
Nessie, stop posting in the chemistry threads if you don't have anything to add about the chemical evidence.

If you want to believe in the Holocaust despite the chemical evidence on the basis of other evidence that you feel is stronger, that is okay, but you can make those points in the appropriate threads.
Incredulity Enthusiast
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 2824
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: The consequences of a lack of relevant training & expertise.

Post by Nessie »

Archie wrote: Sat Oct 04, 2025 8:18 pm There is a fitness YouTuber who is always bragging about his PhD. A critic found his dissertation and went through it and did an hour long demolition of it. Many people don't realize how much "PhD level" work is absolute dogshit. Academics talk about their "peer review," but the reality is that there is often little quality control because NOBODY READS THIS STUFF, including seemingly the doctoral advisors and the dissertation committees.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elLI9PRn1gQ

From the comments,
Image
That applies to certain supposedly qualified Holocaust revisionists.
K
Keen
Posts: 780
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: The Kola Study - An Own Goal by Team Holocaust

Post by Keen »

Nessie wrote: Wed Nov 20, 2024 1:20 pm Kola reported finding what he called a waxy fat mass at the bottom of the boreholes.
Kola alleged that he found fat at the bottom of the alleged "huge mass graves."

Nessie wrote: Wed Nov 20, 2024 1:20 pm The boreholes also prove that the graves are a combination of such decomposed corpses and cremated remains.
"Proves"???

:lol:

Nessie,

List all of the Belzec graves / cremation pits in question that you can conclusively prove currently contain the remains of at least 2 human beings: __?__.

Now let's watch Nessie RUN!

:lol:
Last edited by Keen on Sun Oct 05, 2025 9:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
K
Keen
Posts: 780
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: The Kola Study - An Own Goal by Team Holocaust

Post by Keen »

Nessie wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2024 4:48 pm Kolas finds corroborate the pyres, because of the large areas of disturbed ground contained ash and cremated remains. Of course, it is not as much as you think it should be, but you are programmed to disbelieve. I would just point out that it one of the largest mass grave sites ever found.
An unsubstantiated allegation does not corroborate anything.
Nessie wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2024 4:48 pm the large areas of disturbed ground contained ash and cremated remains.
The alleged disturbed ground allegedly contained cremated remains.

When is someone going to show us the proof that Kola actually discovered what he alleged he discovered?
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
K
Keen
Posts: 780
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: The Kola Study - An Own Goal by Team Holocaust

Post by Keen »

Archie wrote: Fri Nov 22, 2024 3:31 am Grave 11 consists of only ONE positive borehole which Kola extrapolated to a 9x5x1.9 grave (80 cu meters). Implicitly, we are being asked to assume this grave once had over 1,600 bodies in it.
About this alleged "ONE positive borehole" in alleged "grave #11."

Would you show us the evidence that has led you to believe that "grave #11" even exists?

Would you show us the evidence that has let you to believe that there actually was a "positive borehole" taken out of alleged "grave #11"?
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 2824
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: The Kola Study - An Own Goal by Team Holocaust

Post by Nessie »

Kola's borehole study is the evidence. Pretending it is not evidence, is merely to deflect from the complete lack of evidence that comes from the so-called revisionist side. Denying that Kola's study and report is evidence, is why so-called revisionism is really denial.
K
Keen
Posts: 780
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: The Kola Study - An Own Goal by Team Holocaust

Post by Keen »

Nessie wrote: Mon Oct 06, 2025 6:25 am Kola's borehole study is the evidence. Pretending it is not evidence, is merely to deflect from the complete lack of evidence that comes from the so-called revisionist side. Denying that Kola's study and report is evidence, is why so-called revisionism is really denial.
The freak Roberto Muehlenkamp:

As I learned from Yoram Haimi of the Sobibor Archaeological Project, the reason why Prof. Kola has not yet published a detailed and illustrated report about his 2001 findings is that he wasn’t paid by the Polish government entity that commissioned his work in 2001. So Prof. Kola is sitting on his findings, so to say, until this problem is solved – which I hope will happen in a near future.
Kola alleged that he discovered 40 "huge mass graves" at Belzec (33) and Sobibor (7).
1 - Is it - True. - or - False. - that; If 40 mass graves contained the bones and teeth of 850,000 people - then each grave would contain, on average, the remains of 21,250 people - ??

2 - Is it - True. - or - False. - that; 21,250 x 32 = 680,000 - ??

3 - In total, how many single, disconnected human teeth have been tangibly discovered within Kola's 40 alleged Belzec & Sobibor mass graves: _?_.

4 - Of the 40 Belzec & Sobibor "huge mass graves" allegedly discovered by Kola; list all of the ones that you can conclusively prove actually exist and currently contain at least an iota of human remains: _?_.

5 - Of the 40 Belzec & Sobibor "huge mass graves" allegedly discovered by Kola; list all of the ones that you can conclusively prove actually exist and currently contain the remains of at least 2 human beings: _?_.

6 - Of the 40 Belzec & Sobibor "huge mass graves" allegedly discovered by Kola; list all of the ones that you can conclusively prove actually exist and currently contain the remains of at least 22 human beings: _?_.

7 - Of the 40 Belzec & Sobibor "huge mass graves" allegedly discovered by Kola; the one that you can conclusively prove currently contains the most human remains is number: _?_.
Now let's watch Nessie run!

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 2824
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: The Kola Study - An Own Goal by Team Holocaust

Post by Nessie »

Keen wrote: Mon Oct 06, 2025 2:19 pm ....

Now let's watch Nessie run!

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
You are the one who runs from debate. Instead, you want me to answer your questions, no matter how vacuous they are, abuse and bully. Debate me, you coward.
User avatar
TlsMS93
Posts: 768
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2024 11:57 am

Re: The Kola Study - An Own Goal by Team Holocaust

Post by TlsMS93 »

Nessie wrote: Mon Oct 06, 2025 6:25 am Kola's borehole study is the evidence.
That has not been peer reviewed.
User avatar
Archie
Site Admin
Posts: 1114
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2024 6:54 am

Re: The Kola Study - An Own Goal by Team Holocaust

Post by Archie »

Keen wrote: Sun Oct 05, 2025 9:27 pm
Nessie wrote: Wed Nov 20, 2024 1:20 pm Kola reported finding what he called a waxy fat mass at the bottom of the boreholes.
Kola alleged that he found fat at the bottom of the alleged "huge mass graves."

Nessie wrote: Wed Nov 20, 2024 1:20 pm The boreholes also prove that the graves are a combination of such decomposed corpses and cremated remains.
"Proves"???

:lol:

Nessie,

List all of the Belzec graves / cremation pits in question that you can conclusively prove currently contain the remains of at least 2 human beings: __?__.

Now let's watch Nessie RUN!

:lol:
Keen,

Do not bump threads with mere repetitions of prior points.

Do not post multiple times in succession for emphasis.

If people don't want to talk to you, do not continue to pester them.
Incredulity Enthusiast
Locked