It is undeniable that centralized organizations have no need to disclose the larger initiatives with those whom they delegate tasks and assignments to.bombsaway wrote: ↑Thu May 15, 2025 7:28 pmI'm not that interested in your proclamations, I think you could convince yourself that the Nazis transported the Jews into Turkey if you wanted to.Callafangers wrote: ↑Thu May 15, 2025 6:55 pmNot only are some of those quotes actually Stubble's and not mine, your notion is totally baseless. Centralized direction of organization and initiatives prevents the overwhelming majority of players from necessarily knowing the bigger picture. I've discussed this in the past with the Manhattan Project as an example. The people coordinating programs (or prompting/accumulating testimony, or delegating tasks, etc.) do not need to inform anyone else not directly involved in that coordination of what the broader motivations are, or what has been omitted, etc.
You're really grasping here, bombsaway.
Yeah, "anyway".bombsaway wrote:Anyway, in Goebbels diary he wrote:
“The procedure is a pretty barbaric one and not to be described here more definitely. Not much will remain of the Jews. On the whole it can be said that about 60 per cent of them will have to be liquidated whereas only about 40 per cent can be used for forced labor.”

You inspire me, bombsaway. You inspired me to repost a past thread on Goebbels, where it is shown beyond any reasonable doubt that Goebbels recognized expulsion and quarantine (for resettlement) as the official policy -- not 'extermination'. See here: https://www.codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=354
The Korherr report describes movement, not 'gassings' or mass shootings of any kind.bombsaway wrote:The Korherr report has the Polish Jewish population dropping by close to 80%.
Of the surviving ghetto inhabitants, we can say probably 60-80% were also survivors of resettlement.
You've been thoroughly debunked on the numbers; I do not need to repeat myself. The numbers of testimony gathered for the 'Holocaust' were due to very calculated, well-organized Jewish networks aiming to gather and align the Jewish spoken narratives with those atrocity narratives which were being widely disseminated in Allied propaganda networks. The patterns of falsehoods in these gathered testimonies alone is enough to largely invalidate them, even categorically, as a source. But the nature of the gathering itself is every bit as suspect, given there is no reason to presume the 'gatherers' had truth among their priorities. Political incentives and personal or ideological motivations in this period were exceptionally relevant, especially for certain groups whose motives are more pronounced (e.g. Zionism, revenge, reparations, geopolitical power grabs).bombsaway wrote:viewtopic.php?p=9114#p9114
referencing this post, if there were 200,000 ghetto testimonies that don't reflect there should be, under normal conditions we could expect 600-800,000 ones that do. These people were silenced, at least relatively. The number zero is quite important, it necessitates multiple layers or levels of containment. According to you, people were being told to amplify testimonies about the ghettos, but any testimony regarding resettlement is not permissible. What's the explanation for this? In wartime I might understand not being allowed to question things, but people are going to get upset about their work and accounts not being recognized and demand explanation. What's a plausible explanation that could be given to them?
You lean into such poor-quality evidence for one, very simple reason: it is all you have.