Convergance of evidence.

For more adversarial interactions
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 1489
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: Convergance of evidence.

Post by Nessie »

Nazgul wrote: Sun May 04, 2025 10:49 am
Nessie wrote: Sat May 03, 2025 2:34 pm
Nazgul wrote: Sat May 03, 2025 11:10 am ... There is not one bit of evidence presented to prove a single gassed Jew...
That is a lie.
Please present the evidence to show it is mistaken. BTW using words like lies, liars is disrespectful, off topic. On a positive note thanks for not returning to RODOH.
You know fine well that there is evidence of mass gassings, from eyewitnesses, documents etc. When you claim no evidence has been presented for gassings, knowing that evidence has been presented, that is the very definition of a lie.
K
Keen
Posts: 91
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Convergance of evidence.

Post by Keen »

Nessie wrote: Sun May 04, 2025 7:19 am The convergence of evidence is about working out what happened
Same with the convergence of the lack of physical evidence method, which proves that there are no "huge mass graves" at Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor or Treblinka II.
K
Keen
Posts: 91
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Convergance of evidence.

Post by Keen »

Nessie wrote: Mon Apr 07, 2025 6:32 pm A newspaper headline has to be the weakest form of evidence out there.
Nessie, you keep asserting that some evidence is stronger / weaker than others. You have even stated that "There is indeed a hierarchy of evidence." You have repeatedly been asked to tell us what this hierarchy is. A separate thread has even been started that would allow you to present your hierarchy of evidence to this forum:

viewtopic.php?t=323

Yet you steadfastly refuse to do so.

What are you waiting for Nessie?

What are you so afraid of?
K
Keen
Posts: 91
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Convergance of evidence.

Post by Keen »

Nessie wrote: Mon Apr 07, 2025 4:08 pm
This whole mass of evidence taken together is supposed to prove that there were gas chambers. No, it doesn’t.
Nessie:
Yes it does.
No it doesn't Nessie.

Everyone knows that the convergence of the lack of physical evidence method proves that there are no "huge mass graves" at Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor or Treblinka II.

And everyone knows that:

No "huge mass graves" at these sites = No gas chambers at these sites.

Even you know that, don't you Nessie?
K
Keen
Posts: 91
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Convergance of evidence.

Post by Keen »

Nessie wrote: Tue Apr 08, 2025 7:05 am Brilliant, so you do know about and use the convergence of evidence. :D
Actually Nessie, I know about and use the convergence of the lack of physical evidence method. :D

Nessie:
The convergence of corroborating evidence proves gassings took place
Not so Nessie. Since the convergence of the lack of physical evidence method proves that no "huge mass graves" exist at B, C, P, S & T II, your sophistic convergence of evidence method fails to prove mass gassings.

No mass graves = no mass gassings.

Simple as that Nessie.

BTW Nessie, your sophistic convergence of evidence method fails to prove mass shootings at B, C, P, S & T II as well.

No mass graves = no mass shootings.

Simple as that Nessie.
K
Keen
Posts: 91
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Convergance of evidence.

Post by Keen »

bombsaway wrote: Thu Apr 17, 2025 4:16 pm It's silly to say the combined physical evidence paints a clear picture of no Holocaust.

What happened at Chelmno? https://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot ... elmno.html

multiple graves hundreds of meters long in a remote forest area, full crushed bones, ash, and chemical products
Really bombsaway? Multiple graves hundreds of meters long and full of crushed bones and ash?
A - $100.00 reward - is being offered for each one of the 21 alleged graves / cremation pits of Chelmno that is proven - with the same standard of proof applied in U. S. civil courts - to actually exist and to currently contain, or to have been collected from, the remains of - at least 2 people.

http://thisisaboutscience.com/
Maps of Chelmno can be found here:

https://vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=229 ... count=2841

Bombsaway:
M - Can you conclusively prove that archaeologists / forensic investigators have actually located / proven the existence of mass graves at Chelmno - Yes. - or - No. - ??

If your answer is - Yes., then:

2 - List all of the Chelmno graves / cremation pits in question that you can conclusively prove actually exist and currently contain at least an iota of human remains: __?__.

7 - List all of the Chelmno graves / cremation pits in question that you can conclusively prove currently contain the remains of at least 2 human beings: __?__.

12 - List all of the Chelmno graves / cremation pits in question that you can conclusively prove currently contain the remains of at least 21 human beings: __?__.

17 - Of the 21 alleged Chelmno graves / cremation pits in question - the one that you can conclusively prove currently contains the most human remains is number: __?__.
K
Keen
Posts: 91
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Convergance of evidence.

Post by Keen »

bombsaway wrote: Sat Apr 19, 2025 4:30 am You guys would love to have convergence of evidence
We do bombsaway, but it is more accurately called the convergence of the lack of physical evidence, which proves that no "huge mass graves" exist at Chelmno.

And, as everyone knows, no mass graves = no mass murder.
Post Reply