Mark Felton says “open air cremations are inefficient”

A revisionist safe space
Post Reply
j
joshk246
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2024 2:11 pm

Mark Felton says “open air cremations are inefficient”

Post by joshk246 »



So last night I was watching Felton’s video about some of Hitlers ashes that might still remain in Germany. Mark was explaining how Hitler and Eva’s bodies were burned according to the record, at the time stamp 9:15 he says “The staff faced two major problems in attempting to destroy Hitler and Eva’s remains completely, an open air cremation is very inefficient and heat varies due to the influence of wind and the shape of the cremation area.”

He also mentions how the cremation lasted 2 and a half hours and SS men were occasionally going to add fuel once the soviet shelling had stopped.
Now, I do wonder if Felton would apply this same logic if somebody asked him about open air cremations at AR camps?
User avatar
Archie
Site Admin
Posts: 134
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2024 6:54 am

Re: Mark Felton says “open air cremations are inefficient”

Post by Archie »

There's of course all the theories that Hitler survived and escaped. I don't buy any of those. I am convinced that Hitler committed suicide at the end of the war. But there is some question about the body. The Nazis didn't want to Allies to mutilate his corpse etc and the Allies didn't want Hitler's remains to become an object of worship for Nazis. So it was inevitable that Hitler's remains were going to be erased of one way or another. The Russians released an autopsy very late, in 1968, and that is one of the sources for the whole "Hitler only had one ball thing." There has been disagreement over whether they correctly identified Hitler's body.

There was a similar thing with the Romanov family. I think in the 90s, they went back and found the remains many years after the fact. The bodies were first buried in a mineshaft but were removed, (partially?) burned, and reburied elsewhere. Reportedly they confirmed the ID with DNA.

But yes open air cremations are often very inefficient, especially if the people doing it aren't very experienced with it. Any real world data will generally undermine the Holocaust.
User avatar
Nazgul
Posts: 62
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 6:41 am
Location: Mordor

Re: Mark Felton says “open air cremations are inefficient”

Post by Nazgul »

Archie wrote: Sun Nov 03, 2024 10:22 pm Any real world data will generally undermine the Holocaust.
In this case it might undermine the credibility of the out side burning claims. This was all invented by Scharführer Herbert Floß, a genius so great that no one outside the AR camps can recreate it.

Of course the resident RODOH troll will sanctify the veracity of the claim due to eye witness reports and then say, if it happened it is true. The science behind the cremations known by all farmers and Indians has no relevance. At one time in the last incarnation of RODOH, the poster postulated that spontaneious human combustion assisted the process.
Wenn Sie lernen, die Reise zu lieben, werden Sie nie enttäuscht sein.
User avatar
TlsMS93
Posts: 32
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2024 11:57 am

Re: Mark Felton says “open air cremations are inefficient”

Post by TlsMS93 »

What about local Poles reporting having to scrape the windows of their homes of ash? :lol:

It doesn't matter how technically such a genocide happened. It was technically possible because it happened.
Post Reply