Germar has returned

A revisionist safe space
Online
User avatar
Archie
Site Admin
Posts: 660
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2024 6:54 am

Re: Germar has returned

Post by Archie »

A post has been removed. Those who wish to read what Eric has to say can read it at his website.

https://holocausthoax.st/germar-rudolf- ... ants-down/

If Eric has evidence of all these allegations he is making he should share it with the authorities. This forum is not equipped to adjudicate such matters.
User avatar
Callafangers
Administrator
Posts: 258
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2024 6:25 am

Re: Germar has returned

Post by Callafangers »

Archie wrote: Tue Apr 08, 2025 12:39 pm A post has been removed. Those who wish to read what Eric has to say can read it at his website.

https://holocausthoax.st/germar-rudolf- ... ants-down/

If Eric has evidence of all these allegations he is making he should share it with the authorities. This forum is not equipped to adjudicate such matters.
Eric, again? Yikes. :?
User avatar
Scott
Posts: 44
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 4:05 am

Re: Germar has returned

Post by Scott »

If Germar Rudolf were actualy a convincted sex offender he would be in the sex offender registry. Perhaps those who make this claim should pony up an actual URL or something.

:)
A young General Napoleon Bonaparte gives the mob a "Whiff of Grapeshot" on the streets of Paris, and that "thing we specifically call French Revolution is blown into space by it."
~ Thomas Carlyle
Online
User avatar
Archie
Site Admin
Posts: 660
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2024 6:54 am

Re: Germar has returned

Post by Archie »

Scott wrote: Thu Apr 10, 2025 11:58 am If Germar Rudolf were actualy a convincted sex offender he would be in the sex offender registry. Perhaps those who make this claim should pony up an actual URL or something.

:)
Technically I guess the registry is only a subset of sex offenders since there are lesser "sex offenses" that are not serious enough to require registration. But in that case saying "convicted sex offender" is misleading since most people will associate "sex offender" with the registry and with serious crimes like rape and child molestation. There is of course a world of difference between streaking (for example) and raping children. Taking advantage of this very wide range of "sex offenses" is just a way of making insinuations, similar to how people like Myles Power kept mentioning the "school playground" with a suggestive wink (without mentioning that there were no children there at that time of morning).

Here are the tiers for the sex offender registry in PA with 15 year, 25 year, and lifetime registration depending on severity.
https://www.meganslaw.psp.pa.gov/Inform ... gistration

The "open lewdness" from 2019 was the most serious offense (an excessive charge imo) and that is not even tier 1. All it says in the 2019 case summary is "Sex Offender caseload is up to Adult Probation. Case may be closed after 12 months if all costs paid and no violations." So that sounds like they put you on some sort of probation for a year. You wouldn't end up on the sex offender registry.
E
Eye of Zyclone
Posts: 25
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2025 3:12 pm

Re: Germar has returned

Post by Eye of Zyclone »

LeafJones (Hunt) wrote: Tue Apr 08, 2025 5:39 am
Eye of Zyclone wrote: Sun Apr 06, 2025 2:23 am
Scott wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2025 7:51 pm Germar Rudolf never got shivved in jail, and he did return home after several weeks, so the affair is almost a moot point now unless Germar is dealt more legal harassment.
Holohoaxers don't need Germar Rudolf in jail. They only need him associated with the words "convicted sex offender" so that they can keep normies away from him and other Holocaust revisionists. When one can't counter an inconvenient truth with valid counterarguments, one can still deter most people from listening to those who speak that truth with repellent lies such as this slanderous allegation.
He IS a convicted sex offender. That's not slander. It's a fact.
I didn't say that he's not a convicted sex offender. I said that (((they))) don't need him in jail. (((They))) only need a usable character assassination label because (((they))) can't reply to the revisionist debunking of the Holohoax with factual counterarguments. That's just what the guardians of an indefensible lie always do in a democracy. When one can't contradict an inconvenient message, one shoots the messenger(s). Ad hominems are the last refuge of cornered liars. A classic.
Post Reply