If Eric has evidence of all these allegations he is making he should share it with the authorities. This forum is not equipped to adjudicate such matters.
If Eric has evidence of all these allegations he is making he should share it with the authorities. This forum is not equipped to adjudicate such matters.
If Germar Rudolf were actualy a convincted sex offender he would be in the sex offender registry. Perhaps those who make this claim should pony up an actual URL or something.
A young General Napoleon Bonaparte gives the mob a "Whiff of Grapeshot" on the streets of Paris, and that "thing we specifically call French Revolution is blown into space by it."
~ Thomas Carlyle
Scott wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 11:58 am
If Germar Rudolf were actualy a convincted sex offender he would be in the sex offender registry. Perhaps those who make this claim should pony up an actual URL or something.
Technically I guess the registry is only a subset of sex offenders since there are lesser "sex offenses" that are not serious enough to require registration. But in that case saying "convicted sex offender" is misleading since most people will associate "sex offender" with the registry and with serious crimes like rape and child molestation. There is of course a world of difference between streaking (for example) and raping children. Taking advantage of this very wide range of "sex offenses" is just a way of making insinuations, similar to how people like Myles Power kept mentioning the "school playground" with a suggestive wink (without mentioning that there were no children there at that time of morning).
The "open lewdness" from 2019 was the most serious offense (an excessive charge imo) and that is not even tier 1. All it says in the 2019 case summary is "Sex Offender caseload is up to Adult Probation. Case may be closed after 12 months if all costs paid and no violations." So that sounds like they put you on some sort of probation for a year. You wouldn't end up on the sex offender registry.
Scott wrote: ↑Wed Jan 22, 2025 7:51 pm
Germar Rudolf never got shivved in jail, and he did return home after several weeks, so the affair is almost a moot point now unless Germar is dealt more legal harassment.
Holohoaxers don't need Germar Rudolf in jail. They only need him associated with the words "convicted sex offender" so that they can keep normies away from him and other Holocaust revisionists. When one can't counter an inconvenient truth with valid counterarguments, one can still deter most people from listening to those who speak that truth with repellent lies such as this slanderous allegation.
He IS a convicted sex offender. That's not slander. It's a fact.
I didn't say that he's not a convicted sex offender. I said that (((they))) don't need him in jail. (((They))) only need a usable character assassination label because (((they))) can't reply to the revisionist debunking of the Holohoax with factual counterarguments. That's just what the guardians of an indefensible lie always do in a democracy. When one can't contradict an inconvenient message, one shoots the messenger(s). Ad hominems are the last refuge of cornered liars. A classic.