Stubble wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 9:17 am
Reprisal then. I said pogrom because it is my impression that the locals pushed for it. Regardless it was a retaliation for an arson that left 50,000 homeless. Like you said, it wasn't an act of sadism, the jews of Kiev were seen as the enemy.
It's not my aim right now to litigate whether the killing was justified. If you read certain speeches, like Himmler @ Posen, it's pretty clear the Nazis thought what they were doing was a Good. Eichmann in the Sassen interview too (you can see background and a long quote from Eichmann at the end
http://johnshaplin.blogspot.com/2014/10 ... tinna.html ) But yes, from the Nazis' perspective you're looking at a justifiable genocide. Just as the Jews were in someway responsible for the detonations at Kiev (this was part of overall Soviet military strategy, and it was Red Army units that set up the rather sophisticated bombs) they were also responsible for the entire Bolshevik regime, for dragging Germany into the war in the first place.
From Hitler's testament
http://www.auschwitz.dk/Will.htm
But I left no doubt about the fact that if the peoples of Europe were again only regarded as so many packages of stock shares by these international money and finance conspirators, then that race, too, which is the truly guilty party in this murderous struggle would also have to be held to account: the Jews! I further left no doubt that this time we would not permit millions of European children of Aryan descent to die of hunger, nor millions of grown-up men to suffer death, nor hundreds of thousands of women and children to be burned and bombed to death in their cities, without the truly guilty party having to atone for its guilt, even if through more humane means.
One point I didn't bring up earlier, which also provides context is that Barbarossa was kind of a failure, despite its seeming success. The goal was to knock the USSR out and by August 1941 this possibility seemed faint at best. This book was pretty eye opening to me,
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/653 ... n-the-east , drawing from German sources to show the sort collective panic they were feeling in August, the realization that the war was going to be what they most feared, not a quick victory, but a long drawn out attritional struggle at which the smaller Germany was going to be at a disadvantage. I think this was a crucial development that had some affect on German policy, transition away from Madagascar plan, and also intensification of killings in the east, which by fall 1941 encompassed Jews, not just males, not just adults, as you can see in the case of Babi Yar.
Stubble wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 9:17 am
So far as the Einsatzgruppen being a handful of soldiers, for task, they were. That's not strawmanning, it's the truth. Look at the contingents.
I was responding to this statement of yours "To ascribe to this small number of men the ability to carry out the crimes with which they have been charged is to make them into some kind of super men, able to be everywhere at once and doing all manner of things at the same time." It wasn't a small number of men who carried out the killings, they had support, as you say maybe they were even supervisors more than directly involved in some cases, like at Babi Yar, though the witness evidence points to SK members directly participating in the shootings. So I would still say "lead" but they had a lot of help.
You seem interested in the idea pogroms vs retaliation so I would say we can check out the Stahlecker (commander of Einsatzgruppe A) report and maybe look over their activities
https://pages.uoregon.edu/dluebke/NaziG ... eport.html
So you have statements like this, which show the EG were initiating the pogroms but also wanted to hide their responsibility for that "It was the task of the Security Police to set these self-cleansing movements going and to direct them into the right channels in order to achieve the aim of this cleansing as rapidly as possible. It was no less important to establish as unshakable and provable facts for the future that it was the liberated population itself which took the most severe measures, on its own initiative, against the Bolshevik and Jewish enemy, without any German instruction being evident." The reasons here are important to think about.
TlsMS93 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2025 10:54 am
According to Wikipedia there were 3 million Jews in the USSR in 1939, in 1959 there were 2.3 million of them and it kept falling in the following censuses, so were millions really shot or relatively few were and the rest were classified by the Germans as Jews to please their superiors? Did the Germans in the USSR identify Jews based on their own classification or that of the Soviets?
There was a mass exodus of Jews from the USSR in the 70s, that's responsible for the decline in population towards the end of the USSR. The 1959 numbers are a little misleading
As of January 15, 1959, the number of Jews in the USSR was 2,268,000—1.09 per cent of the total Soviet population. Twenty years previous, as taken January 17, 1939, the figure was 3,020,000, or 1.78 per cent of the total population. Thus, there are today 752,000 fewer Jews in the Soviet Union than there were twenty years ago. If, moreover, we consider the (estimated) 1,900,000 Jews who were added to the Soviet population from the annexed territories of Eastern Poland, the Baltic countries, Bessarabia, and Northern Bukovina, during the years 1939—41, then the figure would be about 2,652,000 fewer Jews in the Soviet Union today than existed in 1941.
https://www.commentary.org/articles/mar ... -the-jews/
So you can look at percentages and also take into account those annexed territories, which held a massive amount of Jews who were killed at a higher proportion than Soviet Jews, who often had time to flee into the interior.