Wheels wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2024 2:02 am
SanityCheck wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 8:55 pmBut hey, I'm happy to ignore you if you'll accept that your failure to integrate T4 into your analysis means your entire argument is stillborn from the outset. THAT is a hurdle that MUST be cleared, since the German SS personnel at Treblinka are so very clearly part of the core story.
Hardly the case... The hurdle in general is cleared by
VEJ Bd. 3 Dok. 101 (S. 275-276) /
PMJ Vol. 3 pp. 286-288. It's a Foreign Office policy memo from August 1940 namedropping Brack and Boehler's office as regards the "organization of transport". It shows that the Madagascar Plan, which also included registration of Jewish assets, envisaged the can-do crew's involvement. It shows that such a "well-attuned organization with a wealth of experience" could have easily been part of a comprehensive resettlement operation. What we're left with is previous documented leading candidates for a Jewish resettlement operation - back when no putative extermination plan was in place.
This would 'count' as acknowledging the T4-AR link by analogy, except Brack was sent to military service in Yugoslavia and had nothing to do with hands-on events in the AR camps, nor did Bouhler. The persistent documented and witnessed links concerned couriering some property plunder and paying for the T4 personnel who were now serving in Poland, is all.
The Gekrat transport company might have been a better bet than taking crematoria stokers and psychiatric nurses from the T4 institutes, but this wasn't the personnel source they raided. So the T4 institute veterans had no experience of organising transit as they were the end destination, they did have experience with carrying out a deception routine for victims slated to be euthanised and killed.
In terms of manpower, the AR camps absorbed a few officers and 100 German personnel, which was not much different to SS-Sonderkommando Kulmhof with a company of order police instead of also absorbing Trawnikis.
The T4-AR connection also meant that when German AR personnel were interrogated, they admitted to gassings in T4 institute and at Belzec, Sobibor and Treblinka. These statements cannot be ignored, especially now we have the Niemann album reinforcing the links/transfer and continued involvement of T4 on the backend of administration.
They mean the ignore-testimonies and reinterpret-documents-in-isolation tactics fail, as they would do anyway.
One must have an answer for whether T4 used gassing or not and if it did, as John Wear argued in an Inconvenient History article, then how come this wasn't used in AR, despite a CO bottle being found at Belzec and one marked with Jennerwein/Brenner, T4 pseudonyms, at Majdanek, the latter at a time when the Polish-Soviet investigation could not possibly have known this micro-detail.
This doesn't rule out arguing that T4 gassings were also a hoax, but the origins of this lie elsewhere; neither Poles nor Jews were directly involved in spreading news about euthanasia gassings in Germany/Austria, the Polish underground only reported on the test gassing in Poznan and some tidbits on Sonderkommando Lange prior to its recycling in Chelmno.
So very rapidly one has from an origins-of-story perspective to consider
1. T4
2. Poznan and Sonderkommando Lange
3. Chelmno
4. the AR camps of Belzec, Sobibor and Treblinka
This makes sense also because of how BCST are euphemised in the Korherr report: consistently, with 'special treatment' edited out on Himmler's orders, and various other points of comparison in documents and eyewitness claims.
Partial and ad hoc explanations based on some (German) documents or other sources are 'short blanket' explanations; they might cover one part but at the expense of leaving another uncovered and getting cold.