Let's help poor Nesserto develop his rebuttable presumption with a couple simple questions:
I believe, based on the evidence that I have seen, that the remains of no less than _?_ people currently lie within the boundary of the Sobibor camp.
I believe, based on the evidence that I have seen, that no less than _?_ graves (mass and single combined) have been archaeologically / forensically / scientifically discovered within the boundary of the Sobibor camp.
The only time the actual graves have not been excavated or otherwise dug into, was the 2011 Staffs Uni survey at TII. Every other site survey has dug into the graves and disturbed remains... They were not full cremations to ashes at the AR camps either... There are a lot of photos online of what excavations have found at the site.
Excellent! I can't wait to see the photos that prove Sobibors "well grave" actually exists and what the excavation of the "huge mass grave" discovered.
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
You have been shown the surveys of the camps that identify the areas that were dug up and where large amounts of cremated remains have been found. For example;
"Large amounts of cremated remains have been found" at Sobibor you say?
Just how "large of an amount" was found?
Where was this alleged "large amount of cremated remains" reburied?
Is this additional grave larger or smaller than the one dug (for the same purpose) at Treblinka II?
Let's not forget:
nessie:
The Nazis were not trying to magically disappear the corpses and the graves.
They were not full cremations to ashes at the AR camps either.
Also nessie:
All the mass graves dug by the Nazis, and the corpses they cremated, are still at the AR camps.
What about the tens and tens of thousands of alleged non-cremated corpses;
Are they still at the AR camps as well - Yes. - or - No. - ??
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.