
Yes, we can. But it seems that someone is too full of himself and immature to tolerate any disagreement over a thing so trivial and blatantly false as the ridiculous Anne Frank stuff above. Given that it seems to be a time for suspicion, I now suspect him of trying to make us look like idiots with this photographic farce.
No offense intended, but you seem too dumb to understand anything.Joe Splink wrote: ↑Wed Apr 15, 2026 4:22 am I find it more interesting than a nearly forgotten oddity like the shrunken heads lie itself.
What you wrote was - "It is now conceded that these [Jivaro] shrunken heads were "not part of any systematic or centralized Nazi extermination program," - which is exactly the opposite of what my initial post stated and documented


I mean, I can't prove it isn't the young girl. I also must admit that I'd find irony if it was. Unfortunately, the evidence for it being Anne Frank is insufficient.Eye of Zyclone wrote: ↑Wed Apr 15, 2026 2:32 pmYes, we can. But it seems that someone is too full of himself and immature to tolerate any disagreement over a thing so trivial and blatantly false as the ridiculous Anne Frank stuff above. Given that it seems to be a time for suspicion, I now suspect him of trying to make us look like idiots with this photographic farce.
My opinion too...Wetzelrad wrote: ↑Wed Apr 15, 2026 10:07 pm Personally I see this as an advantage. It's absolutely true that there are still people who believe in the shrunken heads, the lampshades, the handbags, the soap, and the gas chambers, and it is very much to our advantage that they are all lumped in together as one mass of idiots.





It wouldn't prove they originate from South America if those artefacts were the shrunken heads of White men like European explorers who were killed by Jivaros in South America. During WW1, a shrunken head was used for anti-German propaganda purposes and it was claimed that the head of a German scientist had been shrunken in Ecuador. There used to be an extensive trade of shrunken heads from South America.






Give me a black wig and I'll probably look more like Anne Frank than the Jewish girl in the bottom picture.Stubble wrote: ↑Wed Apr 15, 2026 5:12 pmI mean, I can't prove it isn't the young girl. I also must admit that I'd find irony if it was. Unfortunately, the evidence for it being Anne Frank is insufficient.Eye of Zyclone wrote: ↑Wed Apr 15, 2026 2:32 pmYes, we can. But it seems that someone is too full of himself and immature to tolerate any disagreement over a thing so trivial and blatantly false as the ridiculous Anne Frank stuff above. Given that it seems to be a time for suspicion, I now suspect him of trying to make us look like idiots with this photographic farce.
I personally think the hairline and the jawline are a match as is the eye spacing, although, the chin is held higher in the camp photo making the chin and nose appear different.Eye of Zyclone wrote: ↑Thu Apr 16, 2026 2:00 pmGive me a black wig and I'll probably look more like Anne Frank than the Jewish girl in the bottom picture.Stubble wrote: ↑Wed Apr 15, 2026 5:12 pmI mean, I can't prove it isn't the young girl. I also must admit that I'd find irony if it was. Unfortunately, the evidence for it being Anne Frank is insufficient.Eye of Zyclone wrote: ↑Wed Apr 15, 2026 2:32 pm
Yes, we can. But it seems that someone is too full of himself and immature to tolerate any disagreement over a thing so trivial and blatantly false as the ridiculous Anne Frank stuff above. Given that it seems to be a time for suspicion, I now suspect him of trying to make us look like idiots with this photographic farce.
![]()
![]()
One can ask GROK or other LLMs to list mainstream figures that do. My expectation is that they probably become evasive if directly confronted.Joe Splink wrote: ↑Tue Apr 14, 2026 2:14 pm I was elaborating on the last sentence of Grok's summary in your previous post.
The part of the last sentence you elaborated on does imply that mainstream scholars accept the shrunken heads as legit.
This one, made by the same guy, seems even more on topic. And much shorter.