NH State Rep Matt Sabourin is working with a Jew in New Hampshire

[rjmurdough]

Last week, we found out that CODOH Rep, and NH State Representative Matt Sabourin Was directly working with a libertarian Jew in New Hampshire. We thought it would be a good idea to alert CODOH to this, so our recruiting coordinator on X sent them a few tweets to let them know. @C_O_D_O_H responded by blocking the account of our Recruiting Coordinator. What would their reasoning be for blocking someone who was trying to alert them to a Jew being involved with one of their reps? Strange, to say the least.

https://gab.com/ryanmurdough/posts/116081122334574044

[Stubble]

Hi goblin. I saw you post on 'x'.

Needless to say, it raises many questions, like, why you are texting with said jew and why exactly you are coming here to drive a wedge.

I'm not going to carry water for Matt here and now, because I don't know him from Paul. I will say however that infiltration and leaks are always expected and that opsec dictates one must trust, but verify.

It is my opinion that you fail verification right out of the box, texting the jew you say Matt is working with, assuming your screenshots are real, which is an assumption.

[Archie]

Letting this through (for now), although we try to avoid "drama" here and attempts to gin up controversy within revisionism. People acting in good faith usually try to resolve concerns more discreetly, not with social media blasts.

To give some context, Matt Sabourin is a New Hampshire state rep who introduced an amendment to have a CODOH rep serve on the NH Commission on Holocaust and Genocide Education. I have a hard time seeing how that could be anything other than a good thing for revisionism. This seems like a don't-look-a-gift-horse-in-the-mouth sort of thing. For more on the NH amendment, see here: https://codoh.com/library/document/brea ... committee/

Judging from your avatar on Gab, Ryan, I assume you are disappointed that Sabourin, a Republican, isn't throwing Romans and brandishing swastikas. The thing to realize is that CODOH is primarily a free speech advocacy organization. Over time, it has also largely subsumed the academic side of revisionism from the IHR. It is not and has never been a national socialist group or anything like that. Holocaust revisionists have long had a range of political backgrounds: far-right (in many variations), libertarian, apolitical, etc. Even if you are full-on natsoc, you should see the wisdom in not tightly bundling historical claims with a larger political platform as people will never agree on the latter.

Finally, I have never cared for this "working with" or "has ties to" stuff or guilt-by-association arguments more generally.

[rjmurdough]

Hi goblin. I saw you post on 'x'.

Needless to say, it raises many questions, like, why you are texting with said jew and why exactly you are coming here to drive a wedge.

I'm not going to carry water for Matt here and now, because I don't know him from Paul. I will say however that infiltration and leaks are always expected and that opsec dictates one must trust, but verify.

It is my opinion that you fail verification right out of the box, texting the jew you say Matt is working with, assuming your screenshots are real, which is an assumption.

I was not ‘texting’ with the Jew. I have a public telegram channel and he responded to my public post about Matt bragging how he is also a member of his Jewish libertarian blog/group. I have no ulterior motives other than exposing Jewish subversion. I don’t really give a shit what you think about me. Do what you want with the information.

[rjmurdough]

Letting this through (for now), although we try to avoid "drama" here and attempts to gin up controversy within revisionism. People acting in good faith usually try to resolve concerns more discreetly, not with social media blasts.

To give some context, Matt Sabourin is a New Hampshire state rep who introduced an amendment to have a CODOH rep serve on the NH Commission on Holocaust and Genocide Education. I have a hard time seeing how that could be anything other than a good thing for revisionism. This seems like a don't-look-a-gift-horse-in-the-mouth sort of thing. For more on the NH amendment, see here: https://codoh.com/library/document/brea ... committee/

Judging from your avatar on Gab, Ryan, I assume you are disappointed that Sabourin, a Republican, isn't throwing Romans and brandishing swastikas. The thing to realize is that CODOH is primarily a free speech advocacy organization. Over time, it has also largely subsumed the academic side of revisionism from the IHR. It is not and has never been a national socialist group or anything like that. Holocaust revisionists have long had a range of political backgrounds: far-right (in many variations), libertarian, apolitical, etc. Even if you are full-on natsoc, you should see the wisdom in not tightly bundling historical claims with a larger political platform as people will never agree on the latter.

Finally, I have never cared for this "working with" or "has ties to" stuff or guilt-by-association arguments more generally.

No, I’m not disappointed that Matt is not a Natsoc at all. I was disappointed that he was involved with a very subversive Jew up here in New Hampshire. This same subversive Jew is working with Jeremy Kaufman, another Jew, who is trying to subvert White identity politics into their libertarian sphere.

[Hektor]

....
Finally, I have never cared for this "working with" or "has ties to" stuff or guilt-by-association arguments more generally.

Second that.

Additionally when it's mixed with people getting historical about something. Then it actually gets embarrassing or even counter-productive.
I'd care about curbing the influence of Jewish lobby groups that work contrary to my own ethnic interest. But about a single Jew flipping burgers at some point, I don't really care.

[HolocaustAcademy]

Matt's been great to work with. We encourage everyone to contribute to Rep. Sabourin dit Choinière's re-election campaign! https://matt4nh.com/

[rjmurdough]

....
Finally, I have never cared for this "working with" or "has ties to" stuff or guilt-by-association arguments more generally.

Second that.

Additionally when it's mixed with people getting historical about something. Then it actually gets embarrassing or even counter-productive.
I'd care about curbing the influence of Jewish lobby groups that work contrary to my own ethnic interest. But about a single Jew flipping burgers at some point, I don't really care.

I have already explained who the jew was and he is clearly not some Jew flipping burgers. I am very familiar with this jew and what he does. Any organization who allows jewish involvement or tolerates Jewish behavior in any capacity is bound to have their organization be co-opted by jews. If you were more educated on Jewish behavior, you would understand that. If CODOH is cool with Jews and tolerant of their existence, that’s very good to know.

[Archie]

Ok, I think Ryan has said his piece. If someone feels strongly that this thread needs to be reopened, please PM me.

[N of 1]

Hi everyone,

Sorry I was late in responding to this and having to create a separate thread. Being new I wasn't able to DM Archie to reopen it; feel free to merge or just delete this.

I'm the jew (assimilated mischling really) that Ryan Murdough was referring to. I just wanted to confirm that the connection between me and Matt Sabourin dit Choiniere (the NH state representative, also a member of the Propertarian/Natural Law Institute) who proposed adding CODOH as a member on the state's Committee on Holocaust and Genocide Education) was real. Matt attended the talk I gave at the Libertarian Party of New Hampshire's tent at at New Hampshire's Porcupine Freedom Festival (Porcfest) last year, and joined my organization as a result.

My role in promoting CODOH goes further than that actually. I'm also a friendly acquaintance of the Mises Institute's Jorge Besada, who had Germar Rudolf give a talk at Porcfest last year as well.

Not looking to perpetuate the silly guilt-by-association drama Ryan was instigating; just wanted to say my piece and thank you for all the great work you guys do in promoting free inquiry into one of modernity's most destructive myths.

Best,

N of 1

PS I love that you guys accept Monero (XMR) as a form of donation. You should consider also accepting PirateChain (ARRR). You might have heard of ZCash, a honeypot of a privacy coin developed by the Israelis. The honeypot works by advertising the superiority of ZCash's Zero-Knowledge Proof shielding to Monero's RingCT. The trick though, is that this shielding is off by default; and is highly inconvenient to apply to a transaction the user wants to be private. Some enterprising developers elsewhere however, forked the Zero-Knowledge Proof protocol into PirateChain, a privacy coin where all transactions are always robustly shielded in this way. You can get an ARRR wallet through the Edge app and trade ARRR through the TradeOgre and MEXC exchanges.

[Archie]

Thread has been unlocked.

[N of 1]

Thanks Archie!