Letting this through (for now), although we try to avoid "drama" here and attempts to gin up controversy within revisionism. People acting in good faith usually try to resolve concerns more discreetly, not with social media blasts.
To give some context, Matt Sabourin is a New Hampshire state rep who introduced an amendment to have a CODOH rep serve on the NH Commission on Holocaust and Genocide Education. I have a hard time seeing how that could be anything other than a good thing for revisionism. This seems like a don't-look-a-gift-horse-in-the-mouth sort of thing. For more on the NH amendment, see here:
https://codoh.com/library/document/brea ... committee/
Judging from your avatar on Gab, Ryan, I assume you are disappointed that Sabourin,
a Republican, isn't throwing Romans and brandishing swastikas. The thing to realize is that CODOH is primarily a free speech advocacy organization. Over time, it has also largely subsumed the academic side of revisionism from the IHR. It is not and has never been a national socialist group or anything like that. Holocaust revisionists have long had a range of political backgrounds: far-right (in many variations), libertarian, apolitical, etc. Even if you are full-on natsoc, you should see the wisdom in not tightly bundling historical claims with a larger political platform as people will never agree on the latter.
Finally, I have never cared for this "working with" or "has ties to" stuff or guilt-by-association arguments more generally.