Auschwitz Crematorium 1 topics

A revisionist safe space
F
Fred Ziffel
Posts: 240
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2024 11:02 am

Re: Auschwitz Crematorium 1 topics

Post by Fred Ziffel »

Here are some more supplicate data to my last post
Attachments
4573rjtr.JPG
4573rjtr.JPG (29.98 KiB) Viewed 443 times
wyrwyt5hw.JPG
wyrwyt5hw.JPG (35.77 KiB) Viewed 443 times
A hole nonsense.JPG
A hole nonsense.JPG (11.94 KiB) Viewed 443 times
I do not believe anything one is not allowed to question
F
Fred Ziffel
Posts: 240
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2024 11:02 am

Re: Auschwitz Crematorium 1 topics

Post by Fred Ziffel »

folks, listen to this guy called Dragon Man in CO, USA at his personal Nazi museum. It almost makes me want to go there and get kicked out by calling out his lies
The BS oozes from his mouth

Link:
I do not believe anything one is not allowed to question
b
borjastick
Posts: 322
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 11:49 am
Location: Europe

Re: Auschwitz Crematorium 1 topics

Post by borjastick »

Fred I just watched this video and wonder if this is a world record of bullshit and crap spoken by anyone about the holocaust. This bloke is so full of shit even his eyes are brown. My guess is is believes it all but has never stopped once to think about it or question things. I also doubt if every article he claims is genuine is actually so.

When he got to the picture of the lines of women, men and younger boys etc and started on about the older and the women were about to be gassed I realised he is incapable of rational thought. Then it got worse when he talked of bars of soap made from human fat. Good grief this was debunked many years back.

And all the while his non stop 100mph diatribe was flowing the visitors lapped it up and happily bought the lies.

Disgusting stuff.
Of the four million jews under German control, six million died and five million survived!
F
Fred Ziffel
Posts: 240
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2024 11:02 am

Re: Auschwitz Crematorium 1 topics

Post by Fred Ziffel »

I sent his daughter who handles the books via snail mail info on why the soap and Zyklon cans are fakes. He is BSing people and knows it
I do not believe anything one is not allowed to question
F
Fred Ziffel
Posts: 240
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2024 11:02 am

Re: Auschwitz Crematorium 1 topics

Post by Fred Ziffel »

At Crem 1
Gosh, do I get to state the German had to source and deal with all the logistics of 70,000 urns? or is it antisemitic?
Attachments
u3554yh.JPG
u3554yh.JPG (64.76 KiB) Viewed 308 times
aus urn doc.JPG
aus urn doc.JPG (129.17 KiB) Viewed 308 times
ccc.JPG
ccc.JPG (73.41 KiB) Viewed 308 times
I do not believe anything one is not allowed to question
F
Fred Ziffel
Posts: 240
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2024 11:02 am

Re: Auschwitz Crematorium 1 topics

Post by Fred Ziffel »

I have been working on a project about the Crem 1 and the building's various issues in regard to what the museum calls a kill center.

I brainstormed and came up with everything I can come up with as an At-Your- Fingertips of the issues of this building narrative.

I am at the Editing phase and am hoping the good folks here can look it over and give input.
What type edits I seek?

-- Other issues not listed by me that could make arguments stronger
-- Any inaccuracies of what I have posted about Crem 1. My goal is to make this a solid argument package
-- Any bad wording or bad grammar
-- Do you have a photo I may be interested in to enhance this package?

I will wait and see if anyone wishes to assist and then go back to the main file and make needed changes. Then, I will upload for anyone who finds worth in this argument package for their use. I will let you all know when the final PDF is posted.

Link to file (thanks Stubble): https://odysee.com/@Ziffel2923:e/Auschw ... oria-One:a

thanks
I do not believe anything one is not allowed to question
User avatar
Stubble
Posts: 2892
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2024 10:43 am
Location: 5th Circle of Hell

Re: Auschwitz Crematorium 1 topics

Post by Stubble »

I'm glad to see the Urns mentioned. I'm not an expert on krema one, or anything really I suppose. It looks like you hit all of tge main points.

With the swinging door, I'm still unsure how exterminationists get around that one. The physical proximity to the SS hospital and the Commandant's house, as well as the canteen also strike me as queer.

I've also often wondered where the coal bunker was, and how often they took delivery. If I recall correctly, the time during the operation of krema I is one of the only windows we have regarding extant coal delivery documentation.

That's all I've got man.
If I were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
W
Wetzelrad
Posts: 481
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2025 6:35 am

Re: Auschwitz Crematorium 1 topics

Post by Wetzelrad »

Fred Ziffel wrote: Sat Jan 10, 2026 4:45 am I am at the Editing phase and am hoping the good folks here can look it over and give input.
Here are a few notes.
After the war, the doorway was modified to a location that would make no common sense.
You might want to reword some of this page. According to both Pressac and Rudolf, it was the Germans that bricked over the original doorway.
https://www.historiography-project.com/ ... tz/157.php

Which doesn't change your arguments, it's just a piece of info the exclusion of which could mislead readers.
Image on the right within the red square verifies it to be a double swing door
Well, it doesn't exactly "verify" it. The doorway symbol in the floorplan drawing conventionally depicts a double swing door, so that should be the default assumption, but it's always possible that it was wrong in some way. We know that what was planned and what was constructed did not always match. Verification would require finding physical traces of the hinge in the wall or something like that.

Though I would say it approaches near-certainty with your inclusion of the two or three other drawings that show the same thing.
There is no question the Majdanek bunker was exposed to Zyklon B due to the blue staining on walls and ceiling, yet the blue staining from Zyklon B exposure is absent from the Auschwitz gas chamber walls and ceiling.
I might exclude this for one reason. Since all blue-stained buildings were new construction while Crema I was a much older building, the pH of the concrete/mortar probably would have inhibited Iron Blue formation there. So while photo comparisons of this type are usually compelling, there is actually a good reason against it for this instance. Though I'm open to being proven wrong.
Fred Ziffel wrote: Sat Jan 10, 2026 4:45 am Other issues not listed by me that could make arguments stronger
Yes, you're missing the argument that the whole theory of the case is based on a reconstruction that was not admitted to be a reconstruction until decades later. In any other situation this would be called overt fraud. Maybe this is trite, but it's still a great point in my opinion. Here is a pertinent quote from Dwork/Van Pelt.

Image

You also left out the common argument about the Zyklon holes being positioned according to the postwar layout, which to me is highly persuasive for it being a fraud. Best depicted here:
https://archive.org/details/germar-rudo ... 9/mode/1up

Some other things. It deserves a punchy intro slide, IMO. An attention getter. Also some of your strongest arguments are near the bottom of the document and your weakest ones at the top, which is bad for modern attention spans.

It could be useful to draw up a short and simple timeline somewhere in the document. The average reader needs help putting all the events in order.
  • Prewar - It was a Polish ammo depot.
  • 1940 - Converted to crematorium.
  • 1942-3 - Alleged gassings in the morgue.
  • 1944 - Converted to air raid shelter.
  • 1947 - Soviet reconstruction.
Possibly also list out all the modifications involved in the "reconstruction" in one place, to create a full picture in the reader's mind. They created ceiling holes, doorway, chimney, furnaces, and removed walls. Perhaps more.

I'm sure there is more to be said about this location, but I have nothing novel to add.
Post Reply