There are indeed anti-Zionist Jews (and I would give credit where it is due) but I am unfortunately no longer able to say it is "just the Zionists", who as a Jewish collective may be of concern to host nations. The systems of organized Judaism (or Jewry) have patterns that are problematic and need to be addressed. With most groups, these problems would be addressed (and likely corrected) internally, before they ever became enough of a problem for outsiders to feel a need to step in. But because the Jewish collective does not generally see a problem with these patterns (rather, these are commonly embraced or at least tolerated), we instead see participation or complacence in these patterns, and even 'gaslighting' and defamation toward any outsiders expressing concern or frustration about them.
You fail to differentiate between national socialism and Hitlerism; they are not the same.Stubble wrote: ↑Thu Oct 09, 2025 11:23 pm Every ism except nazism has been founded by jews...
https://odysee.com/@Granola_Nazi:9/Culture-Cleaner:7
The every single time meme, it's true...
I suspect your personality type is INFJ, the answer to your question is the INFJ Σ mindset. Putin for instance is a subset of that personality type INTJ. Yes INFJ Jews are speaking out, the lone wolves so to speak. Most people are Alpha or Beta personality, show ponies, they seek validation hence follow public approval.Callafangers wrote: ↑Thu Oct 09, 2025 11:27 pm That said, wouldn't a nation (of non-Jews) typically be forgiving of individual Jews who step forward as patriots of the nation to speak truthfully about these matters? Perhaps Jews as individuals often have more fear of their own collective than they do of the "goyim".
Is it just personality type, though, or is there a question of principles and empathy? Do people of other personality types lack these traits?Nazgul wrote: ↑Thu Oct 09, 2025 11:42 pm I suspect your personality type is INFJ, the answer to your question is the INFJ Σ mindset. Putin for instance is a subset of that personality type INTJ. Yes INFJ Jews are speaking out, the lone wolves so to speak. Most people are Alpha or Beta personality, show ponies, they seek validation hence follow public approval.
So, you are saying a jew founded National Socialism then Mr Wraith?Nazgul wrote: ↑Thu Oct 09, 2025 11:38 pmYou fail to differentiate between national socialism and Hitlerism; they are not the same.Stubble wrote: ↑Thu Oct 09, 2025 11:23 pm Every ism except nazism has been founded by jews...
https://odysee.com/@Granola_Nazi:9/Culture-Cleaner:7
The every single time meme, it's true...
The German Workers Party was founded by Anton Drexler; this was essentialy a socialist party to protect the rights of the workers, similar to labour parties in existence within the UK, Australia and NZ. Sadly those parties have lost their roots, slightly left centre of the political spectum and now gone full blown communist, similar to Antifa in the US.
There seems to be an incongruency here...Nazgul wrote: ↑Fri Oct 10, 2025 12:12 amThe German Workers Party was founded by Anton Drexler; this was essentialy a socialist party to protect the rights of the workers, similar to labour parties in existence within the UK, Australia and NZ. Sadly those parties have lost their roots, slightly left centre of the political spectum and now gone full blown communist, similar to Antifa in the US.
Adolf became leader of the DAP adding National Socialist to the name, creating a personal cult. He was not a bad person at all, fulfilling a need to destroy the communist horde that came from the Russias. At that time Berlin was a vassal of Moscow.
To answer your question yes Jews were involved in the foundation of the DAP, there were many in the Sturmabteilung, being proud soldaten of WWI.
I guess you can only talk about the Jews you know, not a part of the diaspora which walked away in the late 19th century. In that sense I agree with you, there is a reason why German Jews emigrated to Scotland and elsewhere, changing the surname a little to disguise who they were and found a new life.Stubble wrote: ↑Fri Oct 10, 2025 12:22 am At the end of the day, I suppose we could talk endlessly about every single 'one good jew'. They are however the exception and not the rule.
One would think they would expose the actions of their ethnic kin rather than cover for them at the detriment of every single generous host being preyed upon...
There is a branch of Jews that totally agree with you. They have more in common with you than you realize. They do not consider themselves as Jewish, non self identification I guess, but one cannot erase a family tree no matter what one wishes. Einstein was such a Jew.Stubble wrote: ↑Fri Oct 10, 2025 12:51 am This isn't antisemitism either, but rather counter semitism, because jewry wants to delete the roots of my family tree from the earth and any memory that we ever existed, because they consider me amalek...
I'd rather not be holodomor'ed thank you very much...
The reason why you have to emphasise the supposed subversiveness of the Jews, is because you cannot evidence that they are collectively acting, in a secret plot, to elevate themselves above all others.Callafangers wrote: ↑Thu Oct 09, 2025 5:53 pmYeah but you're bending the interpretation of subversion just a tad, here. Here's the definition:Nessie wrote: ↑Thu Oct 09, 2025 4:23 pm The RC Church, from its power base in the Vatican City, has been subverting people all over the world, for many centuries. For example, the colonisation and conversion of Central and South America. The native people were often not given any choice, but to stop their existing religious beliefs and convert to Catholicism. The religious conversion of Ireland was not so brutal, but the Church subverted existing religions and customs and imposed its will on the country for the next 1500 or so years.
You're diminishing the 'secrecy' element almost entirely, here [EDIT: also note that the places being 'colonized' could often hardly be said to have had any system or government in-place]. Catholic churches brought in big steeples and priests in obvious attire and could not wait to spread the message and win converts. Jews are not looking to recruit or convert anyone. They do not proselytize. Thus, they quite intentionally remain a foreign element. Add to that that they commonly change their names and portray themselves as loyal patriots to the host nation, all while organizing en masse to redirect (subvert) those interests to instead serve Jewish objectives.Subversion. noun. /səbˈvɜː.ʃən/ is the act of trying to destroy or damage an established system or government, often secretly.
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictio ... subversion
The Catholic church and other European endeavors were also in a period of "winner takes all" global conquest. The purpose of the [Jewish-involved] League of Nations and its successor, the United Nations, was the international agreement to abolish that era for good. Thus, much of your 'colonization' deflection is moot.
Another thing which separates Jewish subversion is its intent. Jews do not have an inclusive vision of a global future, nor do they value in general the freedom and autonomy of other peoples, despite claiming that they do. Catholic intentions (and Muslim, Christian, etc.) are out in the open: they intend to convert everyone, and they are honest about it. Jews collectively claim, on the other hand, that they are solely interested in being noble leaders on a "special" (but certainly not supremacist) mission from "Hashem" (God) as his 'ambassadors' on Earth. Unfortunately for them, some of their more vocal rabbis and thought leaders have dispelled this myth and made clear that the Talmudic scripture and its interpretations generally or at least frequently align toward a world that involves Jews wiping out an entire race by violence ('Amalek', who many Jews interpret to have been revealed as white Europeans), and ultimately subordinating all nations to serve Jews indefinitely, until these other nations/races eventually die off as well, leaving Jews to reign on the Earth entirely -- the sefirot finally restored and the kelipot done away with.
On that note, for those unaware: in traditional kabbalistic thought (Jewish mysticism, widely-embraced among Jews), the early stage of the creation of the universe entailed that a "divine light" ("sefirot") filled various vessels but that these vessels could not contain the light, so they shattered. The shards/fragments of the vessels are known as "kelipot". Both the divine sparks of light (sefirot) which previously filled the vessels and the kelipot became scattered all across the Earth. And Jews (kabbalists) believe that it is their mission to fix this 'disorder' where the sefirot/sparks are obscured or tainted by the kelipot, which involves elevating the sefirot/sparks above the kelipot, and eventually letting the kelipot wither away, since it was never important to begin with. This is the ideological formulation and justification by which many Jews practice "tikkun olam" -- which translates to "to fix the world". It is their duty to elevate Jews and Jewish interests (sefirot/sparks) above all other people and nations (kelipot). There is no point at which Jews became "elevated enough" in this framework -- they are meant to control everyone and everything on Earth, without exception, forever.
This is the "promise" of a future that Jews yearn for. Ever see orthodox Jews rocking back and forth, seemingly yearning for something, or see Chabad Jews with the 'rebbe', singing "we want Moshiach now!"? This is what they yearn for -- the world, all to themselves.
If this isn't a supremacist, hostile worldview, I don't know what is.
I have never argued that different collectives all act in the same way, to further their interests. I have argued that all collectives act in ways to further their interests and used Roman Catholics as an example of that. I have proved their extensive geo-political and socio-political activities, that promote Catholicism, over others and how they have asserted and established dominance over many countries. I have provided an example of where that dominance has been shattered and how national interest was established over the Church's interest.HansHill wrote: ↑Thu Oct 09, 2025 7:44 pm This is why nobody takes Nessie seriously.
He is bending over backwards to define Christians as subversive for converting pagans to Christianity, while simultaneously defining Jews as non-subversive for subverting foreign nations, infiltrating their institutions, influencing these institutions to enact self-preferential policies using the resources of others, and protecting themselves with those policies again using the resources of others.
Just when you think he couldn't get any more pathetic!
**Edit**
Nobody would find themselves stumbling into such a f@cking weird set of positions through independent reasoning a priori. He is clearly debating this point antagonistically because we are revisionists, he is a self-declared antagonist of revisionists, and if he concedes anything about Jews then he capitulates solid ground to us. Hence the gymnastics.
No. It is your contention that Jews disproportionately promote their interests. I asked you to evidence that. You refused. I did some quick research to establish that RCs also extensively promote their interests and now, you demand I do more work, whilst you do none.Callafangers wrote: ↑Thu Oct 09, 2025 7:55 pmLet's give Nessie another shot.HansHill wrote: ↑Thu Oct 09, 2025 7:44 pm This is why nobody takes Nessie seriously.
He is bending over backwards to define Christians as subversive for converting pagans to Christianity, while simultaneously defining Jews as non-subversive for subverting foreign nations, infiltrating their institutions, influencing these institutions to enact self-preferential policies using the resources of others, and protecting themselves with those policies again using the resources of others.
Just when you think he couldn't get any more pathetic!
Nessie, kindly do me a favor:
Please list honestly and comprehensively all of the differences in scale (per capita) and intent between the Catholic/Christian organizations you have been speaking to, and the Jewish organizations myself and others have been speaking about.
Let's hear your own comprehensive outline of what you will admit as differences between them. I think that is a good starting point, no? Please be thorough so that we don't have to reply with a lot of "what about...?". Do your best to include all objective differences between them, especially the ones that revisionists here have spoken to (feel free to put your own 'spin' on each item, just so long as its included).
Fair enough?
If a secret plot were happening, Nessie, what would that evidence look like? What's the bar or threshold you would set for "evidence"?