Forensic Chemistry

For more adversarial interactions
User avatar
HansHill
Posts: 1063
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2024 3:06 pm
Location: Arlen, TX

Re: Forensic Chemistry

Post by HansHill »

Callafangers wrote: Sat Oct 04, 2025 6:55 pm :lol:

Well we appreciate Mrs. Hill for affording us so much of your time. Send her our gratitude (and maybe some flowers).
Thanks gentlemen, she's a very happy woman!

Image
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 2807
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: Forensic Chemistry

Post by Nessie »

HansHill wrote: Sun Oct 05, 2025 11:52 am
Nazgul wrote: Sun Oct 05, 2025 7:57 am This post has nothing to do with forensic chemistry, and he knows it. He diverting the thread to "evidencing".
Nessie wrote: Sun Oct 05, 2025 8:20 am The thread got onto the topic of how Zyklon B could be introduced to the chamber, by HansHill here;

viewtopic.php?p=16553#p16553
Nessie wrote: Sun Oct 05, 2025 7:29 am Which is the gas chamber, not the undressing room
Nazgul is right - you have blabbered on needlessly about this dogsh#t argument of yours which your own side doesn't even uphold. Here is Jamie McCarthy, peer of Richard Green, agreeing with JC Pressac that Room 1 is the "gas chamber" and 2 is the undressing room:
Below that, the first two rooms listed ("Raum 1," "Raum 2") have been written in as "Leichenkeller," which means "morgue." The Leichenkeller numbered "one" is the homicidal gassing chamber.
https://phdn.org/archives/holocaust-his ... inventory/
Image

This means, your document places the items in the wrong location.

"b-b-but I don't understand...!"

We know you don't.
I do understand that Pressac is clear that the evidence has the wire device in the gas chamber, not the undressing room and that you constantly refuse to link me to the image you keep posting, that you know I cannot see.
Post Reply