Forensic Chemistry

[Nessie]

Can anyone else post the image Callafangers is reluctant to let me see?

[Callafangers]

Can anyone else post the image Callafangers is reluctant to let me see?

What?

I have not been on this thread recently.

[Nessie]

Can anyone else post the image Callafangers is reluctant to let me see?

What?

I have not been on this thread recently.

Sorry, it is HansHill, not you, who is refusing to post or link to an image I can see.

[HansHill]

Reported.

[Stubble]

First they counted on the stupidity of their adversary, and then, when there was no other way out, they themselves simply played stupid. If all this didn't help, they pretended not to understand, or, if challenged, they changed the subject in a hurry, quoted platitudes which, if you accepted them, they immediately related to entirely different matters, and then, if again attacked, gave ground and pretended not to know exactly what you were talking about. Whenever you tried to attack one of these apostles, your hand closed on a jelly-like slime which divided up and poured through your fingers, but in the next moment collected again.

Mr Hill, you appear to be at the part in bold with Nessie...

[HansHill]

Mrs Hill is very angry that this has taken up so much of my time, however I appreciate the previous ~3 pages as a platform to make such incisive arguments against this ridiculous point for posterity

[Nessie]

Reported.

Why?

[Nessie]

Elsewhere HansHill stated;

"I am collating the relevant documents and images here to demonstrate that JC Pressac dishonestly contrives to mis-attribute the Drahtnetzeinschiebevorrichtungen (or wire mesh sliders) from Morgue 2 to Morgue 1, that is from the "undressing room" to the "gas chamber"."

In his book, Pressac states;

https://phdn.org/archives/holocaust-his ... 0429.shtml

"The second line shows that “Raum 2 / room 2”, idem. [Leichenkeller] was fitted with:
· “10 Lamp o. Kug. u. Tel. Feuchtsicher / 10 lamps other than globes. waterproof”
· “3 Zapfhühne / 3 taps”,
· “4 Drahtnetzeinschiebvorrichtung / 4 wire mesh introduction devices” and
· “4 Holzblenden / 4 wooden covers.”

He goes on to state;

https://phdn.org/archives/holocaust-his ... 0430.shtml

"However, drawing 2197 from the “October Revolution” archives indicates that Leichenkeller 1 had 16 lamps and 3 taps and Leichenkeller 2, 10 lamps and 5 taps. There has been inversion of the lines on the inventory as from the number of lamps. The document should read:
1st line: Room 1 — Leichenkeller [1]: 16 lamps. 3 taps. 4 introduction devices, 4 covers.
2nd line: Room 2 — Leichenkeller [2]: 10 lamps, 5 taps."

Then;

"The aerial photograph of 24th August 1944 taken by the Americans shows that the 4 introduction devices were indeed installed in Leichenkeller 1 / gas chamber 1 of Krematorium II, and not in Leichenkeller 2 / undressing room."

The evidence that the introduction devices were in the gas chambers, not the undressing room, comes from the eyewitnesses who worked there and that the documents record the devices as being in the same room as the wooden covers, and those covers are evidenced as being in the room that sticks out from the main building at 90 degrees to it, as shown in the train photo, the aerial photos and eyewitness descriptions.

[HansHill]

It took this muppet 3 pages to learn what his own document says. Embarrassing!

Anyway, the wire mesh sliders were inventoried in room 2.

[Callafangers]

Mrs Hill is very angry that this has taken up so much of my time, however I appreciate the previous ~3 pages as a platform to make such incisive arguments against this ridiculous point for posterity

Well we appreciate Mrs. Hill for affording us so much of your time. Send her our gratitude (and maybe some flowers).

[Stubble]

Peggy is one of the good ones Sir. You should keep her.

[Nessie]

It took this muppet 3 pages to learn what his own document says. Embarrassing!

Anyway, the wire mesh sliders were inventoried in room 2.

Which is the gas chamber, not the undressing room, as corroborated by multiple sources of evidence. You cannot even manage the basic task of evidencing what happened inside Krema II, 1943-4.

[Nazgul]

Which is the gas chamber, not the undressing room, as corroborated by multiple sources of evidence. You cannot even manage the basic task of evidencing what happened inside Krema II, 1943-4.

This post has nothing to do with forensic chemistry, and he knows it. He diverting the thread to "evidencing".

[Nessie]

Which is the gas chamber, not the undressing room, as corroborated by multiple sources of evidence. You cannot even manage the basic task of evidencing what happened inside Krema II, 1943-4.

This post has nothing to do with forensic chemistry, and he knows it. He diverting the thread to "evidencing".

The thread got onto the topic of how Zyklon B could be introduced to the chamber, by HansHill here;

viewtopic.php?p=16553#p16553

[HansHill]

This post has nothing to do with forensic chemistry, and he knows it. He diverting the thread to "evidencing".

The thread got onto the topic of how Zyklon B could be introduced to the chamber, by HansHill here;

viewtopic.php?p=16553#p16553

Which is the gas chamber, not the undressing room

Nazgul is right - you have blabbered on needlessly about this dogsh#t argument of yours which your own side doesn't even uphold. Here is Jamie McCarthy, peer of Richard Green, agreeing with JC Pressac that Room 1 is the "gas chamber" and 2 is the undressing room:

Below that, the first two rooms listed ("Raum 1," "Raum 2") have been written in as "Leichenkeller," which means "morgue." The Leichenkeller numbered "one" is the homicidal gassing chamber.
https://phdn.org/archives/holocaust-his ... inventory/

This means, your document places the items in the wrong location.

"b-b-but I don't understand...!"

We know you don't.