Aktion 1005 Was Not To Destroy Remains?

For more adversarial interactions
User avatar
Wahrheitssucher
Posts: 384
Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 2:51 pm

Re: Aktion 1005 Was Not To Destroy Remains?

Post by Wahrheitssucher »

bombsaway wrote: Tue Jul 15, 2025 2:00 pm
Wahrheitssucher wrote: Tue Jul 15, 2025 1:52 pm Are the "graves" proven to not exist?
Are "unicorns" proven to not exist?”

Both use the same logic. Do you agree?
No lol, I think there is credible evidence…
Erm… Ok. :?
You have confirmed that the problem is that you DO have an unfortunate comprehension disability.

LAST ATTEMPT TO ASSIST YOU:
You weren’t asked if there was ‘evidence’ for either.
You were asked to compare the logic being used in two sentences, arguing for existence of both unicorns and the alleged mass-graves.
A ‘holocaust’ believer’s problem is not technical, factual, empirical or archeological — their problem is psychological.
Online
b
bombsaway
Posts: 1208
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2024 2:23 am

Re: Aktion 1005 Was Not To Destroy Remains?

Post by bombsaway »

Wahrheitssucher wrote: Tue Jul 15, 2025 3:16 pm
bombsaway wrote: Tue Jul 15, 2025 2:00 pm
Wahrheitssucher wrote: Tue Jul 15, 2025 1:52 pm Are the "graves" proven to not exist?
Are "unicorns" proven to not exist?”

Both use the same logic. Do you agree?
No lol, I think there is credible evidence…
Erm… Ok. :?
You have confirmed that the problem is that you DO have an unfortunate comprehension disability.

LAST ATTEMPT TO ASSIST YOU:
You weren’t asked if there was ‘evidence’ for either.
You were asked to compare the logic being used in two sentences, arguing for existence of both unicorns and the alleged mass-graves.
I don't use the "proven to not exist" as an argument for why mass graves exist. What i was trying to convey was that keens questionnaire was pointless.
K
Keen
Posts: 385
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Aktion 1005 Was Not To Destroy Remains?

Post by Keen »

bombsaway wrote: Mon Jul 14, 2025 10:02 pm So what? Are the "graves" proven to not exist?
Yes:
CONCLUSION / STATEMENT OF FACT: Applying legal standards used in U.S. courts along with the information presented on this website, Greg Gerdes has LEGALLY PROVEN that the above alleged “huge mass grave discoveries” are fraudulent charades, the Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II mass murder / holocaust allegations are false, and the orthodox holocaust story did not happen as alleged.

NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE - PROVES - NO MASS MURDER

Additionally, and independent of any other reward offered on this website, a reward of - $5,000.00 - will be remitted to anyone who can refute the above conclusion / statement of fact in a publicized debate against Greg Gerdes. Rules are essentially the same as those for the other challenges on this site. Contact Greg Gerdes for details.

http://thisisaboutscience.com/
K
Keen
Posts: 385
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Aktion 1005 Was Not To Destroy Remains?

Post by Keen »

bombsaway wrote: Tue Jul 15, 2025 1:37 pm There's evidence of the graves
There is no clear, convincing or credible evidence.

*10 - Is it - True. - or - False. - that; The largest (in terms of quantity of remains) of the one hundred graves / cremation pits in question at Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II, in which verified human remains have been tangibly located via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented archaeology, is - THIS SOBIBOR GRAVE - ??

Image
Last edited by Keen on Mon Jul 28, 2025 3:18 pm, edited 2 times in total.
K
Keen
Posts: 385
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Aktion 1005 Was Not To Destroy Remains?

Post by Keen »

Nessie wrote: Tue Jul 15, 2025 1:07 pm You reject evidence of mass graves
Liar.

*10 - Is it - True. - or - False. - that; The largest (in terms of quantity of remains) of the one hundred graves / cremation pits in question at Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II, in which verified human remains have been tangibly located via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented archaeology, is - THIS SOBIBOR GRAVE - ??

Image
K
Keen
Posts: 385
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Aktion 1005 Was Not To Destroy Remains?

Post by Keen »

Nessie wrote: Mon Jul 07, 2025 4:21 pm Does anyone think it is actually possible to wipe a mass grave from existence, leaving no trace, so it appears the ground has never been dug into and bodies buried there?
Yes; You, bombsaway, confused jew and an untold number of other low IQ holoco$t cult members all believe the magically disappearing jew theory.
K
Keen
Posts: 385
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Aktion 1005 Was Not To Destroy Remains?

Post by Keen »

bombsaway wrote: Mon Jul 07, 2025 6:36 pm The bodies were destroyed
FYI. "Destroyed" is a code word the low IQ holoco$t cult members use for "magically disappearing" a body.
K
Keen
Posts: 385
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Aktion 1005 Was Not To Destroy Remains?

Post by Keen »

borjastick wrote: Mon Jul 07, 2025 6:41 pm Bombsaway is struggling now. Hilarious that someone who uses every semantic and trick in the book to try to justify six million people disappearing can accuse us of semantics.

'If you cannot show us where they went they must have died in the gas chambers etc'.

'If you cannot show us bodies they must have died'.

Honestly these people are pathetic.
"Struggling" is an understatement, but "pathetic" is spot on.
Online
b
bombsaway
Posts: 1208
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2024 2:23 am

Re: Aktion 1005 Was Not To Destroy Remains?

Post by bombsaway »

Keen wrote: Fri Aug 22, 2025 10:47 pm bombsaway, if you had 2.145 million of these:

Image

you wouldn't even need to bring up the subject of resettlement, would you?

But all you have is this:

Image

:lol:
Why are you so sure there isn't crushed bones in these graves? (as forensic reports state)
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 2478
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: Aktion 1005 Was Not To Destroy Remains?

Post by Nessie »

The Nazis did not want to risk millions of corpses, in numerous mass graves all over Poland and eastern Europe being found, that could be examined like this;

Image

So they exhumed and cremated the corpses, so the ground ended up a mix of ash, cremains and decomposed larger body parts, that looked like this, at TII.

Image

They did that to prevent body counts, corpse identification and establishing the cause of death. So-called revisionists suggest this is what is at the AR camps;

Image

Undisturbed ground that has never been dug into and contains no human remains, but they fail to provide any archaeological or geophysical evidence to prove that claim.
K
Keen
Posts: 385
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Aktion 1005 Was Not To Destroy Remains?

Post by Keen »

Nessie wrote: Sat Aug 23, 2025 7:06 am So they exhumed and cremated the corpses, so the ground ended up a mix of ash, cremains and decomposed larger body parts, that looked like this, at TII.

Image
Is that one of the alleged "huge mass graves" of Treblinka Nessie - Yes. - or - No?

If your answer is yes, then what number is it?
K
Keen
Posts: 385
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Aktion 1005 Was Not To Destroy Remains?

Post by Keen »

Nessie wrote: Sat Aug 23, 2025 7:06 am They did that to prevent body counts, corpse identification and establishing the cause of death. So-called revisionists suggest this is what is at the AR camps;

Image

Undisturbed ground that has never been dug into and contains no human remains, but they fail to provide any archaeological or geophysical evidence to prove that claim.
The unsubstantiated allegation that "huge mass graves" exist at Treblinka II has been proven to be a big lie:

OPENING / FUNDAMENTAL STATEMENT OF FACT: It is alleged in orthodox historiography that; during WW II, the bodies and burnt remains of hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of jews were buried in numerous “huge mass graves” at Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II. However, despite all the deceptive allegations to the contrary, the truth is, the largest (in terms of quantity of remains) of the one hundred graves / cremation pits that are fraudulently alleged to have been “scientifically proven” to currently exist at these five sites, in which verified human remains have been uncovered / tangibly located via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented archaeology, contained the remains of - ONLY FIVE PEOPLE.

CLOSING STATEMENT OF FACT: Using the information presented on this website and applying legal standards used in U.S. courts, this website's opening / fundamental statement of fact can be LEGALLY established as fact in a U.S. court.

NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE - PROVES - NO MASS GRAVES, WHICH - PROVES - ARCHAEOLOGICAL FRAUD

Additionally, and independent of any other reward offered on this website, a reward of - $5,000.00 - will be remitted to anyone who can refute the above closing statement of fact in a publicized debate against Greg Gerdes. Rules are essentially the same as those for the other challenges on this site. Contact Greg Gerdes for details.

https://thisisaboutscience.com/

We're waiting on the lying coward Nessie to show us a "huge mass grave" at Treblinka II that contains the remains of 6 people, but this is the best he can do:

Image

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Post Reply