This is a presentation I ran across on YouTube proporting to rebut the Resvisionist Thesis.
His take on Aktion 1005 seems novel. Apparently, they didn't just erase physical graves, but, also all of the related records to the alleged extermination program.
I haven't been through the whole thing yet, but, it seems he doesn't seem to rely on the shoes. Hopefully I haven't spoke too soon, there is still some run time, and he may kick back on the shoes at some point.
Bonus content, 'Robert Jan Van Pelt on Comedy Cellar' starts at around 39 minutes.
https://www.youtube.com/live/Kv2NkT_qa1 ... uFu7IhmPkh
Anybody feel like cracking into any of this and discussing it?
Dr Kenneth Hanson on 'Holocaust Denial'
Dr Kenneth Hanson on 'Holocaust Denial'
If I were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
Re: Dr Kenneth Hanson on 'Holocaust Denial'
This thread hasn't gained much traction. I suppose that is to be expected. I don't think the usual suspects want to try to defend the orthodox thesis as described in the presentation.
It has generated some interest in the lazerret.
viewtopic.php?t=851
It seemed worthwhile to link to the main thread here.
It has generated some interest in the lazerret.
viewtopic.php?t=851
It seemed worthwhile to link to the main thread here.
If I were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
Re: Dr Kenneth Hanson on 'Holocaust Denial'
If true that is an explanation, why there is no evidence for this. Only for rather normal securing operations in the rear of the front.Stubble wrote: ↑Mon Jul 06, 2026 3:46 pm This is a presentation I ran across on YouTube proporting to rebut the Resvisionist Thesis.
His take on Aktion 1005 seems novel. Apparently, they didn't just erase physical graves, but, also all of the related records to the alleged extermination program.
,,,