A Photo Challenge Issued To All "Revisionists"

[Keen]

Revisionists:

1 - Show us a photo of a core sample taken by Kola in which "charred human remains" can be identified.

2 - Show us a photo of a core sample taken by Kola in which "human remains in a state of decay" can be identified.

3 - Show us a photo of a core sample taken by Kola in which "at least some amount of corpse material" can be identified.

4 - Show us a photo of a core sample taken by Kola in which at least one (out of the alleged 8 million) human tooth can be identified.

5 - Show us a photo of a core sample taken by Kola which is identified as a sample taken from a specific "huge mass grave." (1-7)

6 - Show us a photo of a core sample taken by Kola which is identified as a sample taken from the "mound of ashes."

7 - Show us a photo of a core sample taken by Kola in which the contents have been scientifically analyzed and conclusively proven to be of human origin.


Your fellow cult member Callafangers is in desperate need of help, and to prevent any further / prolonged embarrassement, he needs to find these photos ASAP.

Andrzej Kola:

We uncovered seven mass graves... In them there were charred human remains and under them remains in a state of decay.

Callafangers:

I think some have been fair to point out that there are certain excavations which most researchers (even revisionists) do not dispute having actually taken place (e.g. Kola at Sobibor...), with significant corpse quantities found... at Sobibor, there have been hundreds of core samples, dozens of which contain at least some amount of corpse material... most people are going to find core sample arguments (and extrapolation) compelling... I take some of their reports on corpses or corpse material found to be possibly sincere

Bonus questions:

Do you think it was intentionally deceitful of Kola to release only a few select photos that show ambigious, undescribed
contents with no mention of which alleged "huge mass grave" they were allegedly taken from, when he could have just as easily released photos that unequivocally showed what he alleged he uncovered and unequivocally told us which "huge mass grave" it was taken from?

If you wanted to prove to the world that the remains of 250,000 jews really were buried in 8 "huge mass graves" at Sobibor, would you have done exactly what Kola did, or would you have done the exact opposite? (Remember, he wanted to prove to the world that the remains of 250,000 jews were buried in the green areas around and under the "ash mound": https://i.postimg.cc/zDtDDXh2/Sobiborgreenareas.png
https://postimg.cc/JHDgjvvL

Where did the soil come from that was used to create the "ash mound"?

Do you think his deceit was an attempt to create a cognitive illusion?

Why does he refuse to release the photos that allegedly prove his unsubstantiated allegations?

(Like I've said: Callafangers is the gift that just keeps on giving! )

[Keen]

The mentally ill freak Roberto Muehlenkamp, who communicated often with both Kola and Haimi (via the VNN forum):

As I learned from Yoram Haimi of the Sobibor Archaeological Project, the reason why Prof. Kola has not yet published a detailed and illustrated report about his 2001 findings is that he wasn’t paid by the Polish government entity that commissioned his work in 2001. So Prof. Kola is sitting on his findings, so to say, until this problem is solved.

... the current archaeological investigators don't have any core samples from Prof. Kola’s archaeological investigation at their disposal,
or even information as to the exact spots in the area where these samples were collected.

But Kola released just enough ambigious information to create a cognitive illusion, didn't he?

All this reminds me of one of my favorite quotes:

It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.

[Keen]

How's the search going boys and girls?

Just a reminder of what Callafrangers says about photographs:

Callafangers:

Photographs at least increase the probability that a sincere research effort has taken place... I take some of their reports on corpses or corpse material found to be possibly sincere... The goal isn't just to "win" here; it's to convince.

I agree totally Callafrangers. And what can be more convincing that showing people the photographic proof that an alleged discovery alleged to have been scientifically proven has actually been proven? Especially when refusing to release photos that actually prove your alleged discoveries could and would be considered fraud.

And what has alleged to have been scientifically proven? Again, we'll let Callafangers tell us:

Callafangers:

there are certain excavations which most researchers (even revisionists) do not dispute having actually taken place (e.g. Kola at Sobibor...), with significant corpse quantities found... at Sobibor, there have been hundreds of core samples, dozens of which contain at least some amount of corpse material... This aligns with what the authors claim in their written reports