Announcing the Inaugural 2026 ARMREG Holocaust Summit!

[HolocaustAcademy]

ARMREG HOLOCAUST SUMMIT
Independent ∙ Fearless ∙ Uncensored ∙ Unconstrained
Tackling the Most-Harmful Ideology Undermining Peace, Truth and Freedom Worldwide
Germar Rudolf (ARMREG Holocaust Academy, CODOH) extends an Open Invitation to All Concerned about Holocaust Dogmatism
It is with great enthusiasm that the newly created AMREG Holocaust Academy announces the 2026 ARMREG Holocaust Summit (holocaustsummit.com). The purpose of the 2026 ARMREG Holocaust Summit is to give all those who are concerned about the dogmatization and political misuse of Holocaust historiography a forum to present their research results, opinions and views to an online community.
The use and misuse of the Holocaust Dogma for belligerent and atrocious politics in the Middle East, and for the suppression of freedom of speech in Western countries, has become increasingly apparent to millions around the globe. Never have the masses been so receptive for critical, skeptical views on how history is misused and distorted for political ends. The number of people willing to challenge the West’s last standing taboo has skyrock-eted. The public is ready to confront openly and unabashedly the orthodox Holocaust narrative. Therefore, the time for a conference is now ripe.
Our live-streamed conference will occur on/around Jan 27th, 2026, a date chosen for a watershed event that contributed to the formation of the Holocaust Dogma, the “liberation” of Auschwitz.
The conference will last 1 to 3 days, depending on the number of papers submitted and accepted. Speakers are allotted roughly 30 minutes to make their presentation online, with 15 minutes of Q&A by a moderator. Presenta-tions can be verbal only or accompanied with slides. To apply for a slot as a speaker, please submit a short abstract at the latest by November 1st, 2025, plus a brief biography (required) and portrait image (optional). Submissions will be vetted based on this by our chairman and academic advisors. Accepted speakers will be informed of this by November 15, 2025.
Papers Are Accepted for the Following Three Topics
– Holocaust and History: Taboo between Dogma and Dissent.
For this section, papers should focus on the actual historical record: on the various ways this event has been defined by historians; on findings – new and old – correcting the established record and our understanding of it; on how Holocaust historiography has been revised over time by both orthodox and skeptic scholars.
– Holocaust and Politics: History as a Weapon
For this section, papers should focus on the use and misuse of the Holocaust for political ends: to immunize fashionable minorities from critique, push certain political agendas, instigate wars, and excuse or even deny ongoing genocides.
– Holocaust and Human Rights: History as a Muzzle
For this section, papers should focus on the misuse of the Holocaust to disenfranchise unfashionable minorities, limit free speech, burn books, incarcerate dissident. Papers are welcome on individual fates of dissidents, on situations in specific countries, on general issues of civil rights threatened by historical taboos, and on the creation of “satellite taboos” with subsequent censorship metastasizing from the central Holocaust taboo.
After the event, we plan on publishing the “2026 Holocaust Summit Proceedings” (as paperback and a free eBook edition) with all presentations included. We request (this is optional) that, for inclusion in these Proceed-ings, all speakers submit a written paper based on their presentation by the end of this year 2025 at the latest. It should be limited to 60,000 characters (no counting foot-/endnotes). All speakers agree to have their presentation, or, where submitted, written paper included in the upcoming printed “2026 Holocaust Summit Proceedings” with-out any royalties paid.
Join us in creating a world forever free of the Holocaust Dogma, we are excited to see you then!
www.holocaustsummit.com

[Keen]

I think it's a huge mistake to omitt "holocaust and science" as a topic.

[Nessie]

...
– Holocaust and History: Taboo between Dogma and Dissent.
For this section, papers should focus on the actual historical record: on the various ways this event has been defined by historians; on findings – new and old – correcting the established record and our understanding of it; on how Holocaust historiography has been revised over time by both orthodox and skeptic scholars.

Is that the part where so-called revisionists get to speak about their various, largely unevidenced, so-called revisions to history? Will that mean they will finally settle the debate on whether the AR camps were transit camps, customs posts, property sorting centres, hygiene facilities, or stops to change to wider gauge trains? Will they agree on whether the Kremas were showers, bomb shelters, corpse stores or delousing chambers?

[Callafangers]

Is that the part where so-called revisionists get to speak about their various, largely unevidenced, so-called revisions to history? Will that mean they will finally settle the debate on whether the AR camps were transit camps, customs posts, property sorting centres, hygiene facilities, or stops to change to wider gauge trains? Will they agree on whether the Kremas were showers, bomb shelters, corpse stores or delousing chambers?

Ironically, all of those things you just listed for what revisionists believe are credibly evidenced (the only debate between revisionists is what proportion of each of these most accurately characterizes these camps), whereas your beliefs (e.g. that there are millions of Jews underground there) have been tested and shown as false.

Oh, and there's the missing wood... d'oh!

[Nessie]

.....

Ironically, all of those things you just listed for what revisionists believe are credibly evidenced

Except you lack any eyewitness, despite over a million people being sent to those camps and the hundreds of camp staff, SS and Jewish. You also lack any documentary evidence of people leaving the camps in any significant numbers.

... (the only debate between revisionists is what proportion of each of these most accurately characterizes these camps)...

Are you now claiming the camps were multi-purpose? The reason why so-called revisionists cannot actually agree on a revision of the purpose of the AR camps, is because none of the suggested revisions is well enough evidenced to produce a consensus. Whereas there is a consensus amongst historians. That proves AR camps as death camps is the best evidenced purpose.

... whereas your beliefs (e.g. that there are millions of Jews underground there) have been tested and shown as false.

Oh, and there's the missing wood... d'oh!

Your methodology for "testing" the evidence is flawed and unique to Holocaust denial/revisionism. For example;

1 - your claim that it has been shown to be false that millions were buried at the camp. Normally, the evidence to prove no large mass grave, comes from archaeological work. The ground is excavated, or subject to geophysical survey and, if it is found to be undisturbed, that proves no graves. Or, only a small grave with only a few corpses is found. Or, only a small area of disturbed ground containing cremated remains. So-called revisionists cannot do that, even though one did conduct a GPR survey of TII. Instead, they just dispute the evidence of huge areas of disturbed ground containing cremated human remains.
Since none have any archaeological or other relevant qualifications, their critiquing of the archaeology is not credible.

2 - your claim about the missing wood, is based on the relative lack of evidence of how wood got to the camps, for the pyres. However, there is a Sonderkommando description of gathering wood locally at TII and an SS officer describing getting wood delivered to Sobibor from a Polish wood yard, for construction work. Poland did not lack trees, so some local gathering and some deliveries is how wood would get to the camps. Missing details does not evidence no wood could have got to the camps for the pyres.

3 - your so-called testing of the evidence, is mere argument from incredulity, whereby you rather arrogantly claim that because you cannot believe, or work out how something happened, such as mass graves and pyres, therefore they did not happen.

The 1.2 and 3 I have just described, are totally unlike how history is normally investigated. Your way results in no evidenced chronology of events that leads to a conclusion. It is a non-history.

[Keen]

...
– Holocaust and History: Taboo between Dogma and Dissent.
For this section, papers should focus on the actual historical record: on the various ways this event has been defined by historians; on findings – new and old – correcting the established record and our understanding of it; on how Holocaust historiography has been revised over time by both orthodox and skeptic scholars.

Is that the part where so-called revisionists get to speak about their various, largely unevidenced, so-called revisions to history? Will that mean they will finally settle the debate on whether the AR camps were transit camps, customs posts, property sorting centres, hygiene facilities, or stops to change to wider gauge trains? Will they agree on whether the Kremas were showers, bomb shelters, corpse stores or delousing chambers?

Nessie, I can't wait to see the paper that you submitt that proves 2.145 million jews are buried in 100 "huge mass graves" at B, C, P, S & TII.

If you would like, we could co author it.

What do you think???

[Keen]

Bla bla bla...

There's nothing stopping you from submitting a paper Nessie.

I can't wait to see it.

Would you like to co author a paper with me?

[Nessie]

Bla bla bla...

There's nothing stopping you from submitting a paper Nessie.

I can't wait to see it.

Would you like to co author a paper with me?

You said;

https://codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=14785#p14785

"Why are you so afraid to see my proof of resettlement?"

How about we co-author a paper on the proof you have of resettlement? First, produce that evidence, so I can see it, thanks.

[Keen]

How about we co-author a paper on the proof you have of resettlement?

OK!

Nessie:

First, produce that evidence, so I can see it, thanks.

OK!

We'll start with all the evidence that is known to exist that 925,000 jews were resettled within the boundary of Treblinka II.

Here is what I have so far (A hat tip to Nessie for providing the photo):



Nessie, of the 925,000 jews that were resettled within the boundary of Treblinka II, how many are we looking at here?

Oh, and where exactly within the boundary of Treblinka II were these bones located? (You can prove that this photo was taken within the boundary of the camp, can't you? We can't include this in our paper as evidence of resettlement if we can't prove that the photo was taken within the boundary of the camp, right?)

[Nessie]

How is a photo of buried human remains at TII, evidence of resettlement?

Resettlement normally refers to moving people to live in a new location, not their killing and burial.

[Keen]

Resettlement normally refers to moving people to live in a new location

Right. And our paper will prove that 925,000 jews were moved to a new location called Treblinka II, correct?

Nessie:

How is a photo of buried human remains at TII, evidence of resettlement?

Oh, about that photo; our paper will have to include your answers to these questions:

Where exactly within the boundary of Treblinka II were these bones located? You can prove that that photo was taken within the boundary of the camp, can't you? And those bones have been proven to be human, correct? We can't include that photo in our paper as evidence of resettlement if we can't prove that the bones are human and the photo was taken within the boundary of the camp, right?

[Nessie]

Resettlement normally refers to moving people to live in a new location

Right. And our paper will prove that 925,000 jews were moved to a new location called Treblinka II, correct?

Nessie:

How is a photo of buried human remains at TII, evidence of resettlement?

Oh, about that photo; our paper will have to include your answers to these questions:

Where exactly within the boundary of Treblinka II were these bones located? You can prove that that photo was taken within the boundary of the camp, can't you? And those bones have been proven to be human, correct? We can't include that photo in our paper as evidence of resettlement if we can't prove that the bones are human and the photo was taken within the boundary of the camp, right?

You are clearly getting confused. The evidence of mass transports to TII comes from Nazi documentation such as the Hofle telegram and eyewitnesses from Jews on the transports, Polish rail workers and SS camp staff.

But that is not what is normally meant by resettlement. So-called revisionists believe that Jews were resettled, in their millions, in the eastern territories that the Nazis captured from the Soviets. Have you got any evidence of that? You suggested you do when you said ""I do have evidence of resettlement - proof in fact...".

[Keen]

Nessie, I thought I would give you an update on my reseach for our joint project.

I think that we should take this statement of yours:

Nessie:

The majority of the eyewitnesses, those who worked inside the AR camps, Chelmno... all admit that mass killings took place.

The Nazis were not trying to magically disappear the corpses and the graves, as they knew that is impossible.

All the mass graves dug by the Nazis, and the corpses they cremated, are still at the AR camps and Chelmno.

The geophysical survey work has identified rectangular pits with straight edges and ramps at TII.

The sheer volume of evidence for mass graves at TII... Mass graves are proven.

By all normal standards of evidencing, they are proven.

I can point to them in the ground.

There are 11 at Treblinka II:

G32, G1, G44, G4, G38, G36, G50, G51, G52, G53 & 54.

and narrow it down to this as our OP:

Nessie:

The Nazis were not trying to magically disappear the corpses and the graves, as they knew that is impossible.

All the mass graves dug by the Nazis, and the corpses they cremated, are still at the AR camps and Chelmno.

Mass graves are proven. By all normal standards of evidencing, they are proven.

But I think we need to add Ponary as well.

Do you agree?

[Nessie]

You said;

"Why are you so afraid to see my proof of resettlement?"

How about we co-author a paper on the proof you have of resettlement? First, produce that evidence, so I can see it, thanks.

[Keen]

You said;

"Why are you so afraid to see my proof of resettlement?"

How about we co-author a paper on the proof you have of resettlement? First, produce that evidence, so I can see it, thanks.

Right. And what better way to show you my proof than co-authoring a paper with you on resettlement?

Nessie:

First, produce that evidence, so I can see it, thanks.

That's what I'm doing here in this thread.

Now please answer my questions from my previous post, thanks.

Oh, and I need your input on the number of jews who we are going to prove were resettled.

Here is what I have so far:

Belzec: 600,000

Chelmno: 300,000

Ponary: 70,000

Sobibor: 250,000

Treblinka II: 925,000

Total for these 5 sites: 2.145 million.