Korherr Report "Decoding" Instruction

[ResearcherGuy]

The Koherr Report is corroborated by the Holfe Telegram, so much for single report.

Er… the “Holfe” telegram!?!?
Who was HOLFE?

…Records were sloppy, except the very detailed Koherr report and Holfe Telegram...

I’ve just provided you with credible evidence showing the alleged intercept of a telegram from Höfle has many issues and is almost certainly a planted forgery.

Here: viewtopic.php?p=22505#p22505

Why have you ignored that evidence?
[/quote]

Sturmbannführer Hermann Höfle, do some research instead of rolling your eyes. "Credible evidence" = run on paragraph making wild claims and presumptions, no citations or sources.

[Hektor]

That's odd. You argue that "Sonderbehandlung" meant Euthanasia, yet the documents you cite or show don't use Sonderbehandlung at alll.

Nope, that is your poor reading comprehension.

Is you throwing a snippet there now your poor communication skills? If you have some critique formulate it sufficiently and clearly.

[Archie]

I'm surprised you came back.

You ignored the request I made below. It was not rhetorical. You need to respond if you want to continue participating on the forum.

If you are going to double-down and claim that you have not misrepresented yourself, then you need to explain your weird position (seemingly unique to you alone) that over a million Jews were executed at the AR camps but weren't gassed.

My position is that murder of them is quite plausible given that they dissapeared without a trace.

ResearcherGuy,

Given that it is now very apparent that you are not a revisionist, please explain to me why you decided to represent yourself dishonestly and why you thought that was a good idea.

Those who disagree with us are welcome on the forum, and we have a Debate board precisely for this. The dishonesty you have displayed, however, is not welcome.

This is an openly and unapologetically revisionist-run forum. However, we take no official editorial stance on any particular issue and people can participate regardless of belief. This includes revisionists who may differ from other revisionists on some things, as well as those who are still "on the fence." We would ask only that you not present yourself dishonestly (e.g., by pretending to be a revisionist when you definitely are not).

[ResearcherGuy]

Is you throwing a snippet there now your poor communication skills? If you have some critique formulate it sufficiently and clearly.

"Is you throwing a snippet there now your poor communication skills?" Talk about irony.

[Wahrheitssucher]

The Koherr Report is corroborated by the Holfe Telegram, so much for single report.

Er… the “Holfe” telegram!?!?
Who was HOLFE?

…Records were sloppy, except the very detailed Koherr report and Holfe Telegram...

I’ve just provided you with credible evidence showing the alleged intercept of a telegram from Höfle has many issues and is almost certainly a planted forgery.

Here: viewtopic.php?p=22505#p22505

Why have you ignored that evidence?

Sturmbannführer Hermann Höfle, do some research instead of rolling your eyes. "Credible evidence" = run on paragraph making wild claims and presumptions, no citations or sources.

Ok.
This is proof we are dealing with a semi-literate dimwit who:
a.) can’t distinguish between two different spellings,
and
b.) who doesn’t understand + doesn’t respond to evidence refuting their position.

[Hektor]

Is you throwing a snippet there now your poor communication skills? If you have some critique formulate it sufficiently and clearly.

"Is you throwing a snippet there now your poor communication skills?" Talk about irony.

Nope talking about the way you behave (again).

[ResearcherGuy]

This is proof we are dealing with a semi-literate dimwit who:
a.) can’t distinguish between two different spellings,
and
b.) who doesn’t understand + doesn’t respond to evidence refuting their position.

Or actually we are dealing with a dimwit who can't comprehend that a name can be spelled in different ways. Shouldn't be that intellectually challenging. Höfle = Hoefle. Some German devices were made by international companies and didn't have german lettering / accent marks, so they changed the spellings to signify an accent mark. This is proclaimed as evidence of anglicization, but it's not. Get smarter.

"who doesn’t understand + doesn’t respond to evidence refuting their position."

No such thing was ever presented. Nobody has explained how 1.27 million people just vanished off record.

[Archie]

Okay, ResearcherGuy. Thanks for stopping by and providing some entertainment. But since you have chosen to misrepresent yourself, you will not be permitted to participate further on the forum. There is no point in having discussions with you since you insist on arguing for a fundamentally incoherent set of beliefs which you don't even really believe.

[Eye of Zyclone]

Okay, ResearcherGuy. Thanks for stopping by and providing some entertainment. But since you have chosen to misrepresent yourself, you will not be permitted to participate further on the forum. There is no point in having discussions with you since you insist on arguing for a fundamentally incoherent set of beliefs which you don't even really believe.

A wise decision. And Nazgul's AI-generated exterminationist posts in this thread should be deleted too if I'm asked. That kind of garbage often causes confusion among readers who are not knowledgeable enough to see through such propaganda tricks and misleading theatrics.