Korherr Report "Decoding" Instruction

[Stubble]

The so-called "facts of common knowledge" (that is, the victors' propaganda selected for posterity) didn't need to be proven at the Nuremberg show trials. They only needed to bestated with enough chutzpah. The magic of "judicial notice".

[ResearcherGuy]

The rail lines lacking the volume capacity where to the East once leaving the camp, different from the ones heading in from the West. Read carefully.

This isn't a comprehensible sentence. Are you reading your own posts carefully before posting, where you're making a point to insult people's reading comprehension?



After looking at the sentence diagram, you might want to stick to the AI for English.

Pretty easy to follow English. I misspelled were as where.

1) The rail lines lacking the volume capacity were to the East once leaving the camp
2) Different from the ones heading in from the West

Which of these are two hard for you to grasp?

[ResearcherGuy]

Impossible because "the mass gassing narrative is absolute horseshit," as you said on page 1 of this thread.

Are you claiming that those deported Jews were steamed to death at Treblinka II?

Never said how they died.

[Archie]

Impossible because "the mass gassing narrative is absolute horseshit," as you said on page 1 of this thread.

Are you claiming that those deported Jews were steamed to death at Treblinka II?

Never said how they died.

You think over a million Jews were killed at the AR camps but you don't think they were gassed? They were killed via some other totally unknown method? Totally incoherent and idiotic.

[Stubble]

Archie, hear me out, what if a sturmzuger was used on formula x-13 to teleport them to Telaviv?

[Archie]

> OP says he's in a "debate" with "someone"
> OP uses exact same "argument" structure as "someone"

This is LLM output, on top of the dishonesty, on top of the uncited wild goose chases, on top of the insults.

In the original version of the OP, it said, "here's this argument I got from the AI, what do you guys think?" and gave a long quote from the AI. He edited/rewrote it several times before I approved it.

[Eye of Zyclone]

Impossible because "the mass gassing narrative is absolute horseshit," as you said on page 1 of this thread.

Are you claiming that those deported Jews were steamed to death at Treblinka II?

Never said how they died.

Yeah, I know. You only need them dead to justify the huge colonial atrocity called Israel. The rest is just cheap pulp fiction literature...

[Eye of Zyclone]

Archie, hear me out, what if a sturmzuger was used on formula x-13 to teleport them to Telaviv?

[Stubble]

Archie, hear me out, what if a sturmzuger was used on formula x-13 to teleport them to Telaviv?

Wait, we actually have a photograph of it!

[Eye of Zyclone]

Wait, we actually have a photograph of it!

As you can see.
And pictures don't lie, as the old saying goes.

[Stubble]

Well, then, problem solved.

Stick a fork in 'er fellas, thread's done. EoZ just produced photographic evidence of the the mass teleportation program.

If it weren't for Hans Kohler and his tireless work on Zero Point Energy, and the development of substance x13, it wouldn't have been possible. Without this photograph, no one would believe that it happened. It explains everything though. The mystery of the magic self immollating disappearing jew has been solved. For some reason I was under the impression the teleportation looked like a volcano covered with Christmas trees.

As EoZ has said, pictures don't lie.

There you have it guys.

[Nazgul]

In the original version of the OP, it said, "here's this argument I got from the AI, what do you guys think?" and gave a long quote from the AI. He edited/rewrote it several times before I approved it.

One should never rely solely on an argument generated by AI. AI systems reproduce patterns from the material they have been trained on, and without careful prompting they tend to repeat prevailing interpretations rather than critically evaluate them. Used uncritically, they can simply echo dominant narratives.

That said, AI can be extremely useful when used properly. It is particularly effective at locating primary sources when specifically asked to do so. For example, I recently used it to help locate Hitler’s 1939 “Euthanasia Decree” (often referred to as the “mercy killing” authorization), which was signed by Adolf Hitler and formed the basis for what later became known as Aktion T4. Even when particular programs were officially halted, the legal and administrative questions surrounding such authorizations remain important subjects of historical study.

When discussing controversial historical topics, AI systems may apply safeguards that limit certain lines of argument. This can create the impression that alternative interpretations are being blocked, even when one is attempting to focus on primary-source material. Different AI platforms apply different moderation frameworks.

Where AI truly excels is in computation. It can perform complex calculations in seconds that might otherwise take hours — for example, statistical procedures such as analysis of variance (ANOVA) and other quantitative analyses.

Finally, AI can be useful as an editorial tool. After completing your own writing, you can ask it to improve clarity, structure, and flow while preserving your content. It is still important to proofread carefully, as many systems default to American spelling conventions unless instructed otherwise.

[Hektor]

Hi, ResearcherGuy. Welcome to the forum.

They assume special-anything refers to murder. Special treatment, special action, special vehicles, etc. Special treatment could mean execution in some cases. It did not exclusively mean execution.
....

Sonder- (special) simply means separate or different from the others. And that means it can mean anything including execution. But if that was the code-word for killing Jews as they assert or insinuate, then that's actually a problem for the Holocaust Narrative. It would mean that Jews being killed were treated differently from the others, meaning that the others were not to be killed.

So either way this isn't really a problem for the Revisionist position on the narrative...Because, occasional execution of Jews, is indeed part of the Revisionist position.

The reason exterminationists jumped on the term 'Sonderbehandlung' was simply that they were desperate to have intentional killing of Jews to be documented. And as terms with -sonder- were pretty common this was a practical solution for their problem.

[Nazgul]

The reason exterminationists jumped on the term 'Sonderbehandlung' was simply that they were desperate to have intentional killing of Jews to be documented. And as terms with -sonder- were pretty common this was a practical solution for their problem.

The Legal and Industrial Reality of Sonderbehandlung

The claim that the term Sonderbehandlung (Special Treatment) was merely "jumped on" out of desperation ignores the specific administrative and legal framework of the camp system.

The term was formally codified under Aktion 14f13 (also documented as Sonderbehandlung 14f13). This was the administrative extension of the T4 programme into the concentration camps, where the sick, the elderly, and those deemed arbeitsunfähig (unfit for work) were systematically culled.

The Legal Basis: The 1939 Protective Memorandum

This was not a general "common term"; it was a specific protective document signed by Hitler in October 1939 (backdated to Sept. 1). It was designed to shield physicians and administrators from prosecution for "mercy killings" by creating a specialised, bureaucratic lane for extermination that bypassed the standard German justice system.
The Continuity of "Special Treatment"

While the formal medical commissions of 14f13 were largely discontinued by 1943, the 1939 Protective Memorandum remained in force until the end of the war. It provided the legal "umbrella" for what is known as "Wild Euthanasia," where camp doctors continued to kill those who were no longer productive—often due to the brutal conditions of labour transports like those found in Fplo 587. The lack of production was not arbitrary; it was usually the result of terminal illness or industrial exposure.

Case Study: The HASAG Industrial Pipeline

Transports to HASAG (Hugo Schneider AG) munitions plants, such as those at Skarżysko-Kamienna, required constant replacement labour because prisoners were being poisoned by daily TNT or picric acid exposure. This exposure caused systemic organ failure, famously turning the skin and hair of the "Yellow Ladies" bright yellow.
At these plants, the "doctor" functioned as an industrial inspector:

• The Diagnosis: If a worker was terminally poisoned, the doctor's "medical input" was simply to confirm the person was a "total loss" to the war effort.
• The Execution: Following this medical "clearance," the factory guards (Werkschutz) or the Schupo would carry out the "dispatch" in nearby forests. Legally, the guards were not "murdering"; they were "executing a medical directive" authorised by the doctor’s prior assessment under the 1939 Memorandum.

Under the "Führer’s Will," a doctor did not have to be physically present at the moment of death. Their legal role was to provide the initial authorisation by diagnosing the individual as unheilbar krank (incurably ill) or arbeitsunfähig (incapable of work). To dismiss Sonderbehandlung as a "practical solution" for historians is to ignore the primary documents that provided the legal immunity for this exact process.


Hitler's Protective Memorandum

Original German Text (Nuremberg Doc PS-630):
Berlin, den 1. Sept. 1939.
Reichsleiter Bouhler und Dr. med. Brandt sind unter Verantwortung beauftragt, die Befugnisse namentlich zu bestimmender Ärzte so zu erweitern, dass nach menschlichem Ermessen unheilbar Kranken bei kritischster Prüfung ihres Krankheitszustandes der Gnadentod gewährt werden kann.
— Adolf Hitler

Translation:
Berlin, 1 September 1939
Reichsleiter Bouhler and Dr. Brandt, M.D. are charged with the responsibility of enlarging the authority of certain physicians to be designated by name in such a manner that persons who, according to human judgment, are incurable can, upon a most careful diagnosis of their condition of sickness, be accorded a mercy death.
— A. Hitler

This memorandum was never rescinded. I will be posting further context regarding the Corfu transportation, specifically the medical consequences (acute renal failure) that resulted from 9 days without water, rendering the transport "terminally ill" and thus eligible for "Special Treatment" under this specific legal framework.

[Hektor]

That's odd. You argue that "Sonderbehandlung" meant Euthanasia, yet the documents you cite or show don't use Sonderbehandlung at alll.