The Franke-Gricksch Report

[Stubble]

Stuff has been forged on both sides of the fence. What usually sinks it, is the contents, because it is the answer to the wish.

'I sure wish I had one that said >insert x<.'

Poof

'Oh look, I have found it all here in this one document'

Sometimes the document even has the correct seals, signatures etc. What it doesn't have? Patents and confirmability...



viewtopic.php?t=207

It happens man.

I also don't have to give a forgery artist any props. It is tradecraft. I would fully expect a professional to use correct paper, ink, equipment etc.

[bombsaway]

I also don't have to give a forgery artist any props. It is tradecraft. I would fully expect a professional to use correct paper, ink, equipment etc.

You would not expect them to track down a typewriter, or break one in a very specific way, no this is not typical. This would require, at the very least, a great deal of energy.

[Stubble]

A presentation from TRS on the report;



It is a response to the HC article.

We have misrepresented the expert report. The expert only confirmed the model of typewriter, and, without the original could not confirm they were typed on the same machine.

I stress again that the biggest problem here is the content, not that it was typed on paper. You seem to think a forger would not use time correct materials or the same model typewriter to make a forgery. This omits the fact that a forger would and this isn't even a complex forgery. It is literally just words on paper.