
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashkenaz
This discussion is getting more and more crazy.
Absolutely not - my argument was about the etymology of the word, and I was not suggesting a direct genetic link whatsoever.Wahrheitssucher wrote: ↑Sun May 25, 2025 12:55 pmThis discussion is getting more and more crazy.
Are you seriously suggesting that the ashkenazim are descended from a great grandson of the mythological person Noah?![]()
Again, absolutely not, and that's a very silly thing to suggest was what I mean. Studying the etymology of the word at best shows us a cultural link, but does nothing to point to the genetics of the current people living there. It was yourself who actually introduced the argument that etymology implies genetic relationship.
The North American city of San Antonio derives its name from a christian saint from Portugal who died in 1231.
Does that prove all the original population and people now living in San Antonio are Portuguese?
Because if we call anybody with European admixture "Europeans" then the word loses all meaning. Again back to the Mestizo argument which you don't seem to have responded to yet - if we call the Mestizos "European" due to their 20-40% European admixture, this completely trivialises what we mean when we say "Europeans". Everybody knows they are not Europeans.
Why don’t you want to accept the self-evident reality that for all discernible, practible purposes ashkenazi jews are Europeans?