Bischoff Letter

For more adversarial interactions
User avatar
Callafangers
Administrator
Posts: 583
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2024 6:25 am

Re: Bischoff Letter

Post by Callafangers »

Wetzelrad wrote: Tue Aug 05, 2025 4:38 am
ConfusedJew wrote: Tue Aug 05, 2025 1:49 am The need for 10 gas detectors would have been inconsistent with morgue functions but critical for gas chambers to ensure safe entry after gassing.
What a fascinating argument. So in your view the vast majority of the alleged Zyklon gassings were impossible because they were all missing this "critical" component. Well done.
:lol:

ConfusedJew is becoming a very effective revisionist.
To those who still believe it: grow up. To those lying about it consciously: may you burn in hell.
C
ConfusedJew
Posts: 679
Joined: Thu May 01, 2025 2:36 pm

Re: Bischoff Letter

Post by ConfusedJew »

Wetzelrad wrote: Tue Aug 05, 2025 4:27 am
Contrary to what's written there, the Bischoff Letter includes no allowance for down time, cleaning, or maintenance. The figures represent 24 uninterrupted hours of operation. That is a blatant lie on Lipstadt's part.
Whether or not this is true doesn't matter because at that throughput rate you could easily cover the totals.

I'm reaching a point with you guys where the things you are responding to me are so nonsensical that there's nothing for me to address.

How do you know the figures don't represent 24 uninterrupted hours of operation? What is your evidence? Where did those figures come from in the first place? Why did they need so many muffles?

So many questions that have no alternative viable explanation.
User avatar
Archie
Site Admin
Posts: 980
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2024 6:54 am

Re: Bischoff Letter

Post by Archie »

A couple of preliminary points

-This document is quite well-known
-You yourself brought it up about a week ago (you probably don't even realize you did since all your posts are copy-paste)

I pointed out to you in the Pressac thread that Pressac himself does not take the numbers in this document seriously. He says it is "a purely hypothetical figure based on no practice of any sort."
https://codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=13295#p13295

If I have a "document," even an "authentic" one, that says that a Toyota Camry has a top speed of 300 mph, this does not prove that the car can actually go 300 mph. We know it can't, no matter what it says on some piece of paper. Numbers on a paper can be wrong.

There are many scientific arguments that can be made. And revisionists have done a great deal of research in this area establishing conclusively that the true cremation capacity was far lower. But let me give you a practical argument. The document claims that Krema I (Auschwitz main camp) had a capacity of 340 bodies per day, or 124,100 bodies per year. Let's do a quick sanity check here. Krema I had six muffles. Dachau and Buchenwald were similarly equipped, each having six muffles. (Let's not get distracted by delving into design differences as we are just trying to get an order of magnitude here). Assuming Auschwitz Krema I with six muffles had a capacity of 124,100/year, what would this imply about Dachau and Buchenwald? It would imply that the non-extermination camps had wildly excessive cremation capacity. Oooooor, these numbers are complete fantasy.

Here are the registered deaths for Buchenwald (again, non-extermination camp). 124K is almost 4x the total deaths for ALL years. That's just stupid. And that includes the spike at the end of the war which would not have been anticipated in the planning. The Buchenwald crematorium was constructed in 1942. That year they had 2,898 deaths, or 7.9 per day. Do you really think the capacity was 340 or anywhere close to that? That would be about 2.3% capacity. Why would they have had over 40 times the capacity they needed? They didn't. The real world, practical capacity was FAR lower.



See here for general discussion of theoretical vs realistic calculations
https://codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=202
Incredulity Enthusiast
Post Reply