The Obvious Ignorance and Mistakes of Some So-Called Holocaust Revisionists

[Eye of Zyclone]

One should distinguish between Holocaust revisionists (scholars, especially researchers) and Holocaust disbelievers (dilettantes, including talented publicists). Holocaust believers also make similar & often bigger mistakes all the time. No big deal if I'm asked.

[Wetzelrad]

On X, Mads Palsvig has gained quite an audience among those critical of Jews. Today I pointed out that the Lachout Document which he cited as proof that gassings didn't happen is probably a forgery, citing revisionists. He responded by immediately blocking me.

In other posts Palsvig has claimed that a Jew "invented the gas chamber", that the Soviet government was 95% Jewish, that Stalin, Churchill, Eisenhower, Putin, and Al-Jolani were/are all Jewish, and that Jews are actually "the Khazarian Mafiya".

One could point out that Palsvig himself is married to a Jew and reports having Jewish family, but I don't think that's really the issue here. I think he is accepting a social media feed of memes as unfiltered truth. What is the corrective mechanism for this problem?

[Eye of Zyclone]

On X, Mads Palsvig has gained quite an audience among those critical of Jews.

I think he is accepting a social media feed of memes as unfiltered truth. What is the corrective mechanism for this problem?

Pointing out that there is a big difference between Holocaust revisionists (scholars) and Holocaust disbelievers (dilletantes), just like there is a big difference between Heliocentric astronomers (scholars) and Geocentric-model disbelievers (dilletantes). There is a reason why Holohoaxers never mention and even less address the works of Carlo Mattogno, Robert Faurisson and Germar Rudolf. On the other hand, Holocaust revisionists never stop addressing the works of Raul Hilberg, Robert Jan Van Pelt and other top antirevisionist historians.

Publicists can be a great asset, but they are rarely experts on what they publicize. Explaining and repeating that truth seems very useful regarding the debate on the Holocaust if I'm asked. Mads Palsvig and other internet Holocaust disbelievers like him are not the official spokesmen of Holocaust revisionism. They are just more or less amateurish publicists who don't believe in the Holocaust.

Perhaps making some memes showing this would be a good idea...

Perhaps making a number of factually accurate revisionist memes and feeding internet publicists like Mads Palsvig with such memes would also be helpful.

[Callafangers]

On X, Mads Palsvig has gained quite an audience among those critical of Jews. Today I pointed out that the Lachout Document which he cited as proof that gassings didn't happen is probably a forgery, citing revisionists. He responded by immediately blocking me.

In other posts Palsvig has claimed that a Jew "invented the gas chamber", that the Soviet government was 95% Jewish, that Stalin, Churchill, Eisenhower, Putin, and Al-Jolani were/are all Jewish, and that Jews are actually "the Khazarian Mafiya".

One could point out that Palsvig himself is married to a Jew and reports having Jewish family, but I don't think that's really the issue here. I think he is accepting a social media feed of memes as unfiltered truth. What is the corrective mechanism for this problem?

So let me get this straight... a guy married to a Jewish woman with Jewish family is getting a lot of attention by being 'antisemitic' and a 'Holocaust Denier', but is doing a very bad job at it, which is ultimately bad PR for anyone critical of Jews or the 'Holocaust' by presumed association?

What could his motives be? Is he genuinely seeking the truth? Or, is he sabotaging truth movements to protect and/or benefit his Jewish wife and family?

Just a thought. I don't have the answer.

[Wahrheitssucher]

On X, Mads Palsvig has gained quite an audience among those critical of Jews. …He responded by immediately blocking me.

Inother posts Palsvig has claimed that a Jew "invented the gas chamber", that the Soviet government was 95% Jewish, that Stalin, Churchill, Eisenhower, Putin, and Al-Jolani were/are all Jewish, and that Jews are actually "the Khazarian Mafiya".

One could point out that Palsvig himself is married to a Jew and reports having Jewish family…

So let me get this straight... a guy married to a Jewish woman with Jewish family is getting a lot of attention by being 'antisemitic' and a 'Holocaust Denier', but is doing a very bad job at it, which is ultimately bad PR for anyone critical of Jews or the 'Holocaust' by presumed association?

What could his motives be? Is he genuinely seeking the truth?
Or, is he sabotaging truth movements to protect and/or benefit his Jewish wife and family?

Just a thought. I don't have the answer.