Undeserved reply to CJ on population statistics

For more adversarial interactions
Online
User avatar
Archie
Site Admin
Posts: 1064
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2024 6:54 am

Re: Undeserved reply to CJ on population statistics

Post by Archie »

Korherr explains the difficulties of counting Jews (from the "short" version).
Necessary reservation. Jewish statistics cannot be regarded uncritically, as there is much scope for error in determining Jewish population figures. Erroneous statistics are attributable inter alia to Jewry's character and development and problems in identifying people as Jews. In addition there have been Jewry's tireless migrations over thousands of years, countless conversions and lapses, attempts at integration, assimilation into the host populations and above all attempts by Jews to avoid being identified as such.


This is really quite similar to the article cited earlier by Dr. Hans Kohn explaining the same difficulties. It seems both Nazis and Jews agree that the whole exercise is fraught with challenges.
Incredulity Enthusiast
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 2635
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: Undeserved reply to CJ on population statistics

Post by Nessie »

Archie wrote: Sat Sep 13, 2025 4:20 pm Korherr explains the difficulties of counting Jews (from the "short" version).
Necessary reservation. Jewish statistics cannot be regarded uncritically, as there is much scope for error in determining Jewish population figures. Erroneous statistics are attributable inter alia to Jewry's character and development and problems in identifying people as Jews. In addition there have been Jewry's tireless migrations over thousands of years, countless conversions and lapses, attempts at integration, assimilation into the host populations and above all attempts by Jews to avoid being identified as such.


This is really quite similar to the article cited earlier by Dr. Hans Kohn explaining the same difficulties. It seems both Nazis and Jews agree that the whole exercise is fraught with challenges.
It was an exercise that they put a huge amount of resources into, often with active assistance. The most accurate figures come from the Germans, Austrians and the Netherlands. The Dutch civil service and police were very cooperative, in enforcing the Nuremberg Race Laws. They all record an indisputable, massive drop, in their Jewish populations, 1939 to 1945, with little spring back after 1945. Those countries had the highest arrest rates, for Jewish citizens.

The countries with the lowest arrest rates, Denmark, Finland and France, are able to show far lower population drops and where their Jewish citizens were in 1945.

What you are doing, is only discussing countries where statistics are harder to come by, such as Ukraine, or Latvia, as their census figures are not so definitive and many Jews were killed, on, or shortly after being arrested, so they were undocumented and have to estimated. There is one source of figures that give precise numbers, the Einsatzgruppen reports of Jews shot, but, it is known, they were prone to exaggeration.

However, whether a country has accurate, well-kept figures or not, every single one reported drops, when Jews came into contact with the Nazis. Plus, there were countries, Romania and Serbia, who took avantage of the war and the opportunity alliance with the Nazis gave them, to conduct their own mass killing of Jewish citizens. If it was all a hoax, why do they admit to mass murders they did not do? Would they not prefer to be another Denmark, and say they resisted the Nazis?

No matter what the circumstances, every nation in Europe, lost Jews and had fewer in 1945, than in 1939. Some can provide detailed figures and other less so.
Online
K
Keen
Posts: 608
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Undeserved reply to CJ on population statistics

Post by Keen »

Nessie wrote: Sat Sep 13, 2025 4:43 pm If it was all a hoax, why do they admit to mass murders they did not do?
:lol: Just another lame attempt at shifting the burden of proof.

Questions like these from low IQ reality deniers like Sergay are nothing less than tacit admissions that the fraudulently alleged mass murder of jews in the so-called "pure extermination centers" have been proven to be lies.
If the evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then the claim is obviously false.
User avatar
TlsMS93
Posts: 751
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2024 11:57 am

Re: Undeserved reply to CJ on population statistics

Post by TlsMS93 »

Nessie wrote: Sat Sep 13, 2025 8:44 am
Yes, it is circumstantial evidence, evidence of opportunity.
We have already discussed that spurious and poorly made poster calling on Jews to gather on a street corner. :)
Online
C
ConfusedJew
Posts: 838
Joined: Thu May 01, 2025 2:36 pm

Re: Undeserved reply to CJ on population statistics

Post by ConfusedJew »

Archie wrote: Sat Sep 13, 2025 3:29 pm
ConfusedJew wrote: Sat Sep 13, 2025 11:56 am
Archie wrote: Sat Sep 13, 2025 6:17 am

You think that it was easier to get accurate numbers in 1945 with everything in shambles than it was in the 1930s? Delusional.
That's not what I said. IQ test!?!?!!?!?!?!?!?!
If you agree with what I said then you are not realizing the implications.

Your argument was that the prewar and postwar stats showing a decrease of perhaps five and a half million or so was proof of the Holocaust. If you acknowledge that there was considerable variation in the prewar figure and that the postwar figure is even more uncertain, that completely undermines your entire argument.
Again, that's not at all what I said. And there isn't considerable variation in the prewar figure. Professional demographers have studied the figures closely and estimated a range of 0.5m. You shouldn't take the authority of an offhanded comment by a Nazi as reliable. If you understand what I am saying, you will realize how pointless this specific thread is.
Online
C
ConfusedJew
Posts: 838
Joined: Thu May 01, 2025 2:36 pm

Re: Undeserved reply to CJ on population statistics

Post by ConfusedJew »

Archie wrote: Sat Sep 13, 2025 3:21 pm
You are here to mindlessly defend your ethnic tribe, and you are doing a very poor job of it.

If you were here for intellectual reasons, then 1) you'd actually be curious about it and would have started reading up and researching it, 2) you would actually listen to what others have to say and you would give their comments serious thought. You don't do either of those things at all. We see a lot of people who are starting to get into this. We know what it looks like when someone is truly interested (on either side), and you ain't it.
I'm here to defend the truth.

1. I have done a lot of research by talking to a lot of different people. That is immeasurably more efficient than reading dozens of books.

2. I do listen and give serious thought to the arguments that even seem to have any merit at all.

3. You don't like what I am saying because I am don't agree with you. That doesn't mean that I am not curious. Maybe it just means that what you are saying doesn't make sense logically or isn't backed by reliable evidence.
Post Reply