This really is a thread for a separate topic but the West had evolved to a more enlightened state was that not going to discriminate against other races or nationalities.
There were Jews involved in the Civil Rights Movement but that was hardly a Jewish led movement.
he 1960s were a time of major social change in the U.S., with growing pressure to end racially discriminatory laws. The quota system (favoring Northern and Western Europeans) was seen as inconsistent with the civil rights reforms happening domestically.
The U.S. was promoting democracy and freedom abroad, especially in the Global South, while maintaining a racist immigration policy at home. This hypocrisy undermined America's image internationally, especially with newly decolonized nations.
President Lyndon B. Johnson, along with lawmakers like Senator Philip Hart and Representative Emanuel Celler, championed the bill as part of a broader push for liberal reforms. The act was signed at the foot of the Statue of Liberty, symbolizing a break from past prejudices. LBJ and Philip Hart were both not Jewish while Celler was, but if it were not Celler, somebody else would have done it.
The national origins quotas were widely seen as outdated and discriminatory. There was increasing bipartisan consensus that immigration should not be based on race or nationality. The law created a new framework that prioritized family reunification and skilled immigrants rather than racial or national origin.
Nobody's primary loyalty is to their "country". They put themselves first, their family, their religion. Even if do you promote a change in immigration policy, which was not driven by Jews or solely supported by Jews, how did that promote "Jewish interests" ahead of national interests? A ton of Jews had already been living in the US by that point and it was obviously not an exclusively white country by that point.Dual loyalty, that's being a jew and putting judea first, not the country on which you live, but, you are well aware of this, there is no way you are so dense as not to see that.
You have to explain to me how supporting immigration reforms to allow more diversity is "treasonous". That greatly benefitted our country in many ways. Maybe it hurt white nationalists, who didn't want other races in for cultural reasons, but then you are the one who is putting your loyalty to non-Jewish white people above the national interest.Both of those things cause expulsion.
What conflicting moral structures are those? Can you be more specific. There are always conflicting moral questions regardless of whether a society has Jews in it or not.Then there are also the conflicting moral structures of our peoples and there is also the fact that your people hold a burning ember of contempt for the people of any nation that hosts them.
I'm not sure what you mean here. You are promoting diversity in the first half. In the second half, you are quoting Mossad's slogan. All espionage, regardless of national origin, is engaged in deception. It has been that way since the moment that man crawled out of the primordial sludge. That quote is misleading.Where I read 'there is wisdom in a multitude of council', you read 'by deception thou shalt do war'.
