/continues to misconstrueIt's pretty simple actually...
Me:
'Point taken'...
/continues to misconstrueIt's pretty simple actually...
were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
Just a reminder that the Poles were still claiming 4,000,000 in the 1980s. These were the people who had control of the most relevant territory for decades. Franciszek Piper, top scholar of the Auschwitz museum in 1978:Stubble wrote: ↑Thu Apr 17, 2025 10:25 pm No, I said that with the older 4,000,000 death count, the patently absurd had to be taken at face value and that the Kremas can deal with the bodies projected by the new number if you assume 100% of the furnaces operated at 100% capacity 100% of the operable days. Then I noted some of the problems with that assumption, but, reiterated that you can actually have the numbers work out.
I made no presuppositions about how the death counts were derived.
Also, I see bombs is trotting out this idea that Hoess retracted his death toll which is not true at all. They latch onto one passage about deportation figures in the so-called memoir and ignore everything else Hoess said, including subsequent to that. Hoess maintained an elevated death toll of 2M+ at his trial in Krakow right before his death.Throughout the almost five years of the camp’s existence about 4,000,000 people lost their lives as a result of disease, execution, and mass gassing, including 340,000 of the over 400,000 men, women and children registered in the camp. (HH#22, pg. 512)
were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
I don't know if you're dishonest or supremely ignorant but I've repeatedly quoted you people historians who provided 1 million figure in the 50s and 60s, eg hilberg who basically founded Holocaust studies.Stubble wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 3:03 am Expert consensus of course, are you saying all those historians and lawyers and witnesses were wrong?
See, this is some of the dishonesty I see from the orthodoxy, 4,000,000 was fact or you were a neo nazi anti semite bigot transphobe racist for decades after the war, now 'what do you mean 4,000,000, it is obviously this new number, because it's just so 'evidenced''....
He wants you to explain why the Poles and Soviets said it was 4M for over forty years. Muh Hilberg (ignoring just about everything else) is not an answer to that question.bombsaway wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 4:25 amI don't know if you're dishonest or supremely ignorant but I've repeatedly quoted you people historians who provided 1 million figure in the 50s and 60s, eg hilberg who basically founded Holocaust studies.Stubble wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 3:03 am Expert consensus of course, are you saying all those historians and lawyers and witnesses were wrong?
See, this is some of the dishonesty I see from the orthodoxy, 4,000,000 was fact or you were a neo nazi anti semite bigot transphobe racist for decades after the war, now 'what do you mean 4,000,000, it is obviously this new number, because it's just so 'evidenced''....
I really don't know if you're trolling or simply incapable of ingesting basic information, either way it disinclines me from engaging w you.
Poliakov strongly objected to Reitlinger's revisionism regarding the statistics.As regards the gigantic human charnel house that was Auschwitz, its commander Rudolf Hoess, testifying before the Nuremberg tribunal, said that 2.5 million Jews had been destroyed there. However, it seems that this figure includes also inmates other than Jews, such as gypsies, Russians or Aryan Poles. We will therefore put the total conservatively at 2 million.
were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
Thanks for reinforcing your ignorance for everyone.bombsaway wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 7:23 am One can speculate about why, but I think the answer is they just didn't care enough. How prominent was the Jewish Holocaust in Soviet consciousness up until the dissolution of the USSR?
at calling hilberg an outlier, he invented Holocaust studies more or less
You are evidently really impressed that Hilberg was capable of basic arithmetic and that he realized the by camp totals should sum up to the total. But that isn't impressive at all and it's quite damning that so many others failed to do this.Hilberg estimates that the number of Jews killed at Auschwitz is probably closer to 1 million, rather than the 4 million commonly cited--2.5 million Jewish victims and 1.5 million others.