The testimony of Maximilian Grabner

A revisionist safe space
Post Reply
c
curioussoul
Posts: 41
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2024 10:23 pm

The testimony of Maximilian Grabner

Post by curioussoul »

Maximilian Grabner is an interesting character in the history of the Auschwitz camp, because he served as the head of the dreaded "Politische Abteilung" (Political Department) at Auschwitz from May 1940 until December 1943, a virtual eon in the context of Auschwitz. He would have been present before the Final Solution ever materialized, and stayed in the camp as a senior SS officer well after the construction and implementation of Crematoria II, III, IV and V. He would have been a crucial witness to such iconic events as the alleged "first gassing", the Himmler visit of 1942, the conversion of the newly constructed crematoria into gas chambers, and he would have had detailed first-hand knowledge of the "selections", the unloading of the Jews at the old ramp, the registration of Jews fit for work, and so on. In many ways, Grabner should have been the perfect witness.

But even so, Grabner is a confounding witness, because he doesn't really appear to have had any first-hand or detailed knowledge of any of these events. He was arrested in Vienna in 1945 and executed in Poland 1948. In his various interrogations with Austrian police and Polish prosecutors, he gave confused answers that don't really jive with the orthodox version of events. The most interesting example is probably the first gassing, which is said to have taken place in the Auschwitz Main Camp around the end of 1941 (between September and early December). Historians still disagree on the details, but the first gassing is said to essentially have been carried out on Russian prisoners of war. Rudolf Hoess claimed that his deputy, Karl Fritzsch, experimented with using Zyklon B to gas prisoners in the basement of Block 11. Nonetheless, Grabner attempted to associate the first gassing with an alleged euthanasia programme and the visit of Doctors Schumann and Mueller, a visit which took place in July 1941, not in September (the earliest possible date for the first gassing).

Quoted from Mattogno (TFG), Grabner stated:

"In 1941, I think in the month of September, an SS man of the Kommandantur secretly showed me a telex from Berlin sent by Glücks, of which I made a copy as always. On it was written succinctly that a Dr. Schumann and a Dr. Müller were to arrive in Auschwitz, that the prisoners they wanted were to be presented along with their documentation, and that prisoners selected by them were then to be made available. Höss, as I found out later, already knew about the details. The action, as far as I can remember, was called ‘Operation Cripples, Incurables, Incorrigibles, Especially Hardened Criminals’. The selected prisoners were then brought by the troops and the leadership of the protective-custody camp to the vicinity of Dresden by means of transport, and [these] were about 4-500 prisoners. The files had to be handed over as far as I can remember. Later I learned that they were supposedly gassed."


Oddly, Grabner claims that about 400-500 prisoners were selected by euthanasia doctors visiting Auschwitz and later sent to Dresden for gassing. This transfer must have taken place at the end of July 1941, several months before the first gassing is supposed to have taken place inside of Auschwitz. Grabner goes on to state that another such transfer was slated to take place about 2-3 months later, again accompanied by doctors visiting the camp, but for whatever reason never happened. Instead, the prisoners were executed for the first time using gas in Auschwitz:

"And after about 2-3 months, there came again allegedly a doctor with a secretary who did the same thing, under the same cover telex Berlin Glücks – Liebehenschel. There were also about 300 prisoners, and they were to be picked up by buses. I could not find out the destination. This transfer did not take place, and so the gassings began."


What's interesting about Grabner's retelling of events is that the alleged first gassing using Zyklon B was not for the purpose of finding a way of exterminating the Jews, which according to Hoess was Fritzsch's purpose in testing the gas on Russian PoW's. In fact, Grabner doesn't seem to be aware that the victims were supposed to be Russian PoW's. Instead, they were mere "prisoners", and the purpose was instead related to a euthanasia programme for cripples and criminals. And it wasn't Fritzsch who discovered the gas, but Hoess himself. But according to Hoess, he was on a business trip in Berlin with Fritzsch discovered the gas. According to Grabner, Fritzsch was the one who later opened up the holes in the roof of Crematorium I.

Grabner also states that SS doctor Siegfried Schwela was present along with Hoess during the first gassing:
"Here, Höss carried out an experimental gassing in the cells of the headquarter’s prison together with SS Hauptsturmführer Dr. Schwela, back then the physician. The prisoners slated for transfer were gassed apparently with blue gas in 2 successive shifts."
The biggest problem with putting Schwela at the first gassing is that he was stationed at Stutthof during this time, and only returned to Auschwitz in March of 1942, and later died of a typhus infection.

Grabner later stated that the first gassings took place "in early 1942", "initially in Block 11", and were only "later" moved to Crematorium I, but this is too late to fit with the timeline of discovering the gas in late 1941 for the purpose of exterminating Jews. By early 1942, the Germans are already said to have begun converting Bunker 1 into a gas chamber. Grabner also states that he personally witnessed these gassings, that only 20-40 detainees at a time were executed, and that the prison block was "made air-tight" for the occasion, but there was no way of making the cell basement of Block 11 air-tight, and Rudolf Hoess claimed that ventilating the basement took several days.

The reliability of Grabner's testimony can be gleaned from some of his other statements, again taken from Mattogno (TFG). In one of his later interrogations, he stated:
"During the time I was head of the Political Department in Auschwitz, about 3 to 6,000,000 people were murdered in this or similar ways."
But in his first interrogation, he stated:
"All gassings, as long as I was in the camp, should amount to 800,000 to 1,000,000."
On the September 12, 1945, he went with 3 million victims:
"But there were at least 3,000,000 while I was head of the Auschwitz Political Department."
After he was extradited to Poland, he returned to his original numbers:
"When I thought about it in 1943, I compared the figures in the reports compiled for Berlin with the death cases at the camp and, as far as I remember, I arrived at the figure of 800,000 to 1,000,000 back then. I do not know how many victims perished in Auschwitz after my departure from there. As for the figure of about 4 million victims for the entire duration of the Auschwitz Camp’s existence, I don’t know what to think."
Graber's perhaps most absurd statement came in relation to the burying of corpses outside the camp in 1942, during a period in which the camp had no functioning crematoria because Crematoria I had broken down:
"Long trenches were dug and filled with corpses. In 1942, in connection with the propaganda about Katyn, the order came from Berlin to dig up the bodies again and burn them, so that no traces could be found."
But the Germans only discovered the Katyn mass graves in April 1943.

Grabner also retold the story of Himmler's gassing inspection during his visit of July 1942, but Grabner claims that Himmler inspected the gassing "in the crematorium". However, during this time, gassings in the old crematorium of the Main Camp had already been abandoned in favor of gassings in Bunker 2 outside of Birkenau, and the Birkenau crematoria had not yet been completed at this time, so it was not possible for Himmler to have inspected a gassing inside of any of the crematoria.

There are countless other examples of Grabner's insane testimony, many of which are mentioned by Mattogno in TFG, but all of this to say that Grabner should have been the ideal witness. He worked as the head of the Political Department for all of the relevant history of the camp as a senior SS officer, but was completely unable to reconstruct the history of the camp and the alleged gassings in any serious way. He was confused, changed his mind and contradicted the official story whenever he got the chance to elaborate on his experiences.
User avatar
Archie
Site Admin
Posts: 220
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2024 6:54 am

Re: The testimony of Maximilian Grabner

Post by Archie »

Grabner apparently got busted by Konrad Morgen for something and was put on trial by the SS, much like Buchenwald Commandant Karl-Otto Koch. Arthur Butz mentioned this in his IHR talk, "Historical Past vs Political Present." He was trying to find out more about the charges against Grabner. Not sure if anything ever came of it.
Recently I sought to use the NARA BDC collection for a specific purpose. The famous internal SS investigation of Konrad Morgen netted Karl Koch, commandant of Buchenwald, Amon Goeth, commandant of Plaszow, of “Schindler’s List” notoriety, and a number of smaller fry, one of them being the head of the Gestapo office at the Auschwitz concentration camp, SS-Untersturmführer (Second Lieutenant) Maximilian Grabner. All the SS personnel arrested were charged with corruption, and it is said that Grabner was charged in addition with murdering either 40 or 2,000 prisoners, receiving a death sentence later commuted to twelve years in prison.[note 5] In some versions of the Grabner story, his trial was postponed and never concluded.[note 6] Grabner was executed by the Poles in 1947.[note 7]

Since it is obvious that prosecution by the SS, for murder, of the head of the Gestapo office at Auschwitz does not harmonize with the claim that thousands were killed daily at that camp, I wanted to clarify just what the charges against Grabner were and how they were disposed of. The BDC collection was the obvious source to consult. I wanted his service record.
https://ihr.org/journal/v19n6p12_Butz.html

Regarding the Block 11 gassings, this seems to have started as a rumor among the prisoners. Notice that in the story below, the prisoners were taking dead bodies to the crematory and they assumed the bodies were gassed because their bodies were reminiscent of gassed bodies in WWI. But that is just nonsense. Cyanide gas was a very common combat gas in WWI, and there's no way these prisoners would be able correctly identify death by cyanide gassing on sight.
In one of Pery Broad's accounts of Auschwitz, he tells a story that sounds rather similar to a bit in Camp of Death. A lengthy excerpt of this is published in Holocaust Handbooks Vol 36, pg 273-274.
One day corpses of Russian p.o.w.’s were tugged out from a dark cell. As they lay in the yard, they looked strangely bloated and had a bluish tinge, though they were relatively fresh. Several older prisoners who had been through the World War I remembered to have seen corpses like that during the war. Suddenly they understood..... gas!
Compare this with pamphlet:
The feeble moonlight is a ghastly spotlight for the piles of stiffened features and livid flesh. One cart, unevenly loaded, overturns, and, for a minute, the corpses seem to regain life as they leap over one another and roll down the embankment, waving their stiffened arms, coming to rest in a scattered mass. The "prisoner ghouls" work feverishly to reload the cart in the fast waning darkness of the night. Before they finish, sudden dawn brings out the strange, greenish pallor of the dead. One prisoner, who has grabbed a corpse by the arm, stops suddenly and stares for a long time into its face. Years ago he had seen another like it, in an abandoned trench, with the same spectral appearance.

It is the mark of poison gas.
Additionally, in one of his affidavits (NI-11984), Broad mentioned having come across a Polish resistance booklet about Auschwitz.
Sometime around 1944, a comprehensive booklet from a Polish resistance movement, in which exact claims were made about gassings and all kinds of other such operations and actions in Auschwitz, was sent to Auschwitz by the RSHA to obtain the views of the Auschwitz authorities on this matter.
It's very possible Broad got this WWI-vet-recognizes-the-gassed-corpse story from the booklet.
https://archive.codohforum.com/20230609 ... cf850.html

Starting around 42 minutes into this old video, David Cole starts talking about Block 11 and how implausible it is as a gas chamber.
https://altcensored.com/watch?v=H4nNe3m_Hh8
User avatar
Archie
Site Admin
Posts: 220
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2024 6:54 am

Re: The testimony of Maximilian Grabner

Post by Archie »

curioussoul wrote: Wed Oct 30, 2024 11:17 pm Graber's perhaps most absurd statement came in relation to the burying of corpses outside the camp in 1942, during a period in which the camp had no functioning crematoria because Crematoria I had broken down:
"Long trenches were dug and filled with corpses. In 1942, in connection with the propaganda about Katyn, the order came from Berlin to dig up the bodies again and burn them, so that no traces could be found."
But the Germans only discovered the Katyn mass graves in April 1943.
Grabner was just "bad with dates"!
c
curioussoul
Posts: 41
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2024 10:23 pm

Re: The testimony of Maximilian Grabner

Post by curioussoul »

Archie wrote: Fri Nov 01, 2024 3:58 am
curioussoul wrote: Wed Oct 30, 2024 11:17 pm Graber's perhaps most absurd statement came in relation to the burying of corpses outside the camp in 1942, during a period in which the camp had no functioning crematoria because Crematoria I had broken down:
"Long trenches were dug and filled with corpses. In 1942, in connection with the propaganda about Katyn, the order came from Berlin to dig up the bodies again and burn them, so that no traces could be found."
But the Germans only discovered the Katyn mass graves in April 1943.
Grabner was just "bad with dates"!
It's funny that you bring up Broad, because he would have been a subordinate of Grabner at the Political Department, and he also repeated the Katyn hoax in July 1945:
"But then came the time when Katyn was foremost news in all German newspapers. […] In view of the happenings at Katyn the presence of mass graves was most compromising, particularly mass graves in which corpses evidently could not decompose properly, but came into sight."
"Converging evidence" according to the likes of Nessie. Coordinated lies according to logic.

What really puzzles me is why witnesses like Hoess and Grabner were unable to bring together a coherent reconstruction of events that jives with the orthodox story. They were in the thick of it, in leadership roles, for longer than anyone else at the camp. Yet their stories not only differ significantly but contain obvious falsehoods and lies. The orthodoxy is essentially forced to fall back on very minor witnesses to reconstruct the gassing story at Auschwitz, while major players take to the sidelines. I guess Hoess would be a significant exception to this rule, but Hoess has been largely sidelined in recent years due to the blatant contradictions and absurdities in his testimony. Hilberg had to remove the Treblinka story entirely in the last edition of his book because it simply can't be squared with anything approaching a believable timeline.
Post Reply