were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
Do you think the Majdanek plaque is direct evidence of a larger campaign to fabricate a systematic operation to mass kill European Jews?Stubble wrote: ↑Tue Mar 11, 2025 7:33 am Majdanek stood as a monument to a lie for 80 friggin years. They still have that eyesore out there with the cremains of the 1.5 million dead.
So far as the rest, Bombsaway, I read your addendum. I didn't even edit my posted reply. It was already addressed in my reply.
I don't know what to say guys.
Go watch 'The Reader'?
were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
Probably because they shot jewish partisans with the einsatzgruppen, and engaged in reprisals and in decimations with them Nessie.
were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
Ok, do you have any direct evidence for this?Stubble wrote: ↑Tue Mar 11, 2025 7:43 am What? No, I think it is a piece of wood with paint on it.
I think the exaggerated death toll is part of a hoax though, along with the fake gas chambers etc.
Majdanek isn't even considered an 'extermination camp'.
From 22 to 5. Revisionism seems to have a good track record.
Now I see what you are doing Bombs.bombsaway wrote: ↑Tue Mar 11, 2025 7:47 amOk, do you have any direct evidence for this?Stubble wrote: ↑Tue Mar 11, 2025 7:43 am What? No, I think it is a piece of wood with paint on it.
I think the exaggerated death toll is part of a hoax though, along with the fake gas chambers etc.
Majdanek isn't even considered an 'extermination camp'.
From 22 to 5. Revisionism seems to have a good track record.
If not, what is the strongest circumstantial evidence you have? Is it the Majdanek plaque?
Once you point me to your strongest evidence I'll give you a more in depth analysis of why I think it's weak. Unless you surprise me with something I haven't seen before.
were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
Why are Latvians still admitting to a Soviet hoax, that paints them in a very bad light, long after the collapse of the SU?Stubble wrote: ↑Tue Mar 11, 2025 7:45 amProbably because they shot jewish partisans with the einsatzgruppen, and engaged in reprisals and in decimations with them Nessie.
Probably because jews died in Latvia and Latvians killed some of them.
They also might be admitting some of the pogroms, which are on film.
You misunderstand me. I believe that the "commie bastards" punched holes in the roof. What I don't believe, is that this is good evidence of a larger campaign to fabricate a systematic operation to mass kill European Jews. But I can get into it in more depth if you want. Just give me the go ahead and I will justify my thinking about this particular event (the punching of holes).Stubble wrote: ↑Tue Mar 11, 2025 7:55 amNow I see what you are doing Bombs.bombsaway wrote: ↑Tue Mar 11, 2025 7:47 amOk, do you have any direct evidence for this?Stubble wrote: ↑Tue Mar 11, 2025 7:43 am What? No, I think it is a piece of wood with paint on it.
I think the exaggerated death toll is part of a hoax though, along with the fake gas chambers etc.
Majdanek isn't even considered an 'extermination camp'.
From 22 to 5. Revisionism seems to have a good track record.
If not, what is the strongest circumstantial evidence you have? Is it the Majdanek plaque?
Once you point me to your strongest evidence I'll give you a more in depth analysis of why I think it's weak. Unless you surprise me with something I haven't seen before.
You can't show me film of jews going gassed, and i can't show you film of red commie bastards punching holes in the roof.
You are pointing out my bias and uneven standard of evidence.
I will reiterate, if it weren't for all of the lies and the betrayal of my trust by 'The Holocaust Industry' or whatever you want to call it, I'd be much more accepting of things and would have such a lopsided burden of proof.
This is irrelevent. The Latvians were shooting partisans and their supporters, due to the murder of thousands of German soldiers. In a war of annihalation, soldiers are not police. It was a matter of existence for another day.
This standard phrase which you used when backed into a corner at RODOH is like water of a ducks back.
You have done a good job explaining why revisionists have fallen for a hoax, whilst thinking you have explained why others have fallen for a hoax!
it is no wonder you have fallen for the denial hoax.
Dude, that hoax stood as fact for over 60 years.
were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
From having to ascribe genocidal intent to the wansee minutes, to having to ascribe to the lie of 'Aktion Reinhard', consider me apprehensive to the idea there was a campaign of genocide.bombsaway wrote: ↑Tue Mar 11, 2025 8:01 amYou misunderstand me. I believe that the "commie bastards" punched holes in the roof. What I don't believe, is that this is good evidence of a larger campaign to fabricate a systematic operation to mass kill European Jews. But I can get into it in more depth if you want. Just give me the go ahead and I will justify my thinking about this particular event (the punching of holes).Stubble wrote: ↑Tue Mar 11, 2025 7:55 amNow I see what you are doing Bombs.bombsaway wrote: ↑Tue Mar 11, 2025 7:47 am
Ok, do you have any direct evidence for this?
If not, what is the strongest circumstantial evidence you have? Is it the Majdanek plaque?
Once you point me to your strongest evidence I'll give you a more in depth analysis of why I think it's weak. Unless you surprise me with something I haven't seen before.
You can't show me film of jews going gassed, and i can't show you film of red commie bastards punching holes in the roof.
You are pointing out my bias and uneven standard of evidence.
I will reiterate, if it weren't for all of the lies and the betrayal of my trust by 'The Holocaust Industry' or whatever you want to call it, I'd be much more accepting of things and would have such a lopsided burden of proof.
I can also give you some things that would be good evidence. Documents saying it was happening, eg an order for subordinates to promulgate the story by fabricating evidence. Or one could get testimony from the subordinates carrying out this order. There's no uneven standard here, these things exist for the orthodox narrative - (the order being to mass kill Jews)
were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.