My eyes. I can see that the distance is too far to make out what was being burnt to cause any smoke, or if people were being shot. Maybe your eyes are better.
Your eyes are not an authority on the usefulness of aerial reconnaissance photographs, especially given your age.
I do not believe that anyone could make out what is being burnt, or people being shot, from the height the photos were taken.
Argument from incredulity and appeal to personal opinion. Try again, Nessie. You can't authoritatively assert things based on fallacies and personal opinion and then expect people to just believe you. Come on.
Your eyes are not an authority on the usefulness of aerial reconnaissance photographs, especially given your age.
I do not believe that anyone could make out what is being burnt, or people being shot, from the height the photos were taken.
Argument from incredulity and appeal to personal opinion. Try again, Nessie. You can't authoritatively assert things based on fallacies and personal opinion and then expect people to just believe you. Come on.
Anyone viewing the aerial photos will agree with me and think you are making rather strange arguments. You would not be able to say what was being burnt or if people were being shot, from those aerial photos.
I do not believe that anyone could make out what is being burnt, or people being shot, from the height the photos were taken.
Argument from incredulity and appeal to personal opinion. Try again, Nessie. You can't authoritatively assert things based on fallacies and personal opinion and then expect people to just believe you. Come on.
You would not be able to say what was being burnt or if people were being shot, from those aerial photos.
Again, argument from incredulity. Try again without the fallacy.
Argument from incredulity and appeal to personal opinion. Try again, Nessie. You can't authoritatively assert things based on fallacies and personal opinion and then expect people to just believe you. Come on.
You would not be able to say what was being burnt or if people were being shot, from those aerial photos.
Again, argument from incredulity. Try again without the fallacy.
No one can tell what is being burnt in this aerial photo;