Please help me find this testimony

[Booze]

For what it's worth, I have now scanned through Jack Taylor's testimony and his written report. In both he mentioned "mashing in a concrete mixer". In neither did he provide any elaboration of this claim. He claimed to have "sworn eyewitnessed statements of these particulars" for a long list of alleged atrocities, but he did not. Many of the items on his list did not come from his collection of sworn statements.

It should more correctly be considered hearsay. It's possible that Kaufman was his source, but that would mean Kaufman gave an unrecorded statement, then kept silent for 71 years, then decided to talk again.

In any case it's worth noting here that Dachau, Mauthausen, and Mühldorf are all in close proximity.

Thank you.
I see that on page 8 of his report.
Also at the bottom of page 8 is a story about human skin lampshades coming from a Dr. Podlaha, who says the culprits are an SS doctor and his wife. The doctor made book covers and the wife made lampshades.
On page 9 &10- gas comes through the shower heads. Cyclone B is loaded into a blower apparatus which propels the gas out of the shower heads.

[Callafangers]

Cyclone B is loaded into a blower apparatus which propels the gas out of the shower heads.

My gardener is seeming mighty suspicious with that leaf blower lately...

[Eye of Zyclone]

Cyclone B is loaded into a blower apparatus which propels the gas out of the shower heads.

My gardener is seeming mighty suspicious with that leaf blower lately...

The authorities of the Mauthausen memorial have just resurrected the Mauthausen gas chamber and its Zyklon blower apparatus despite the fact that Yehuda Bauer himself, "the preeminent scholar of the Holocaust," had previously liquidated that old propaganda lie.

[Scott]

Revisionist writings on Joshua Kaufman include Carolyn Yeager's three articles as well as one more recent article by Eric Hunt. The latter is so excessively crass that I won't even link to it, but it does raise some useful points, some of which I borrow below.

Kaufman claimed to work in Birkenau in an above-ground gas chamber (01:28:17) not in any crematorium (01:23:28, 01:28:53). But the bodies he moved were taken by stretcher to the crematorium (01:25:20). No such arrangement ever existed, according to the experts.

Kaufman claimed that he was not Sonderkommando but rather a repeat volunteer who helped remove bodies from the gas chamber for the Sonderkommando (01:23:28). This is a distinction unknown to the experts, and therefore invented.

Kaufman claimed all the Sonderkommando were regularly killed to keep them from talking (01:27:34), but he was not killed with them. This is a gaping hole in the supposed plan to eliminate witnesses.

Kaufman claimed that gassing victims were inexplicably "frozen together" and he had to "break bones" to do his work (01:23:48, 01:25:04, 01:49:15). Nothing like this results from Zyklon gas.

He asked how people including deniers can believe his stories if he himself doesn't (01:48:30-01:49:45).

It's unbelievable. And this is what I wonder, how people can believe to my stories? It's not a story. This what-- I say it every time, what I went through. How they can believe me if I don't believe in nothing? I wonder if you who will believe me. I wonder if her if she'll believe me. I would-- if you would tell me the stories what I am telling you, I wouldn't believe you.
[...]
If you tell me, I would listen to you, but I would never believe it. And I'll say it again. And I don't believe your story, whatever you are doing with this collection of the Holocaust survivors. And I'm not angry of the deniers either. If I don't believe, how they can believe?

He said that after the war Hungary was more antisemitic than before, with the antisemites thinking "we came back more [than] when we left" (03:44:37, 03:45:16).

He called Pope Pius XII an antisemite (03:58:10).

He claimed Jonathan Pollard's prison sentence was motivated by antisemitism (04:51:31).

My experience is that people who claim to see antisemitism everywhere are blinded by tribalism and unable to be honest narrators of history.

I don't intend to be the go-between here, but Eric Hunt is posting at RODOH and had a few comments about this that he wanted me to draw attention to at CODOH.

(Note, that at RODOH, I do not intend to censor him on the basis of profanity or being crass.)


Eric Hunt says:

"[...] Wetzelrad is incorrect, and so is everyone who ever looked into this. Kaufman clearly describes being sent to Auschwitz 1 to work breakin' bones of frozen together gassing victims in a non-existent gas chamber in 1944, somehow not located in Crema 1. Wetzelrad is wrong on this. Kaufman does not claim to have worked in a BIRKENAU gas chamber but to have volunteered to do gig work at AUSCHWITZ 1, which is easy to debunk because in 1944 no gas chambers at all are alleged there.

"I made a video on the matter and made sure not to say anything 'Crass' but Wetzelgenius still can't figure it out."

https://rumble.com/v79sc30-the-turn-of-the-tide.html

"I wrote this post here shittalking him back; it's up to you if you want to post this one as well: "

https://rodoh.info/thread/884/closed-de ... au-kaufman


Thanks

[Wetzelrad]

Lol, I don't mind "shittalk" but it's difficult to share Eric Hunt's content these days with all the profanity, the personal attacks, and his unusual sense of humor. If some innocent soul goes to look up info about Kaufman and finds his website, they will find all of that before they find a sober analysis. See for yourself: https://reeholocaust.st/california-stat ... g-scumbag/

As to my "missing out" on Hunt's claim about Kaufman walking to Auschwitz I, that is because no where on that page does he make that claim. No, I hadn't watched his video about it.

As to Hunt's claim, he could be right. Kaufman said he "marched back [...] two or three kilometer" (01:29:10) which is consistent with the distance to the Auschwitz main camp. However it's speculative. Later in the testimony he confusingly said he did not ever go from Birkenau to Auschwitz (02:20:18).

Otherwise we are largely in agreement.