Comments on other threads.

[Nessie]

HansHill;

viewtopic.php?p=25797#p25797

I actually took "formation" to mean "arrangement" of the pellets, ie how they were arranged within the columns once poured / lowered*, not their physical dimensions.

*this is the exact problem we are faced with, since we don't know** were they even poured or lowered!

**well, we know they weren't poured or lowered at all because this is all a house of cards.

Why does any of that matter? How is it important to the evidence? How does not knowing exactly how the columns worked prove that they did not exist?

[Keen]

nessie:

I am both a trained historian and police officer.

A mass grave is defined as a grave containing multiple human corpses, or the remains of multiple people.

* * * * *

nessie, how many actual mass graves did CSC actually prove actually exist within the boundary of the Treblinka II camp?

nessie's answer:

12 - G32, G29, G1, G44, G4, G38, G36, G50, G51, G52, G53, G54.

[But] I cannot show graves.

Geophysics scientifically and conclusively proves that there are pits and that they exist.

But it DOES NOT prove that those pits contain human remains.

I cannot physically show you mass graves.

nessie, if you can't show us mass graves, then what are these?

Photos of TII, from the 1945 surveys, showing the site after grave robbing activity

Isn't digging into graves the very definition of "grave robbing activity"?

[HansHill]

If you proved, by meticulously going through each camp and ghetto, in the way you go into meticulous detail over the Kula column, that millions of Jews were alive in 1944-5, you would have proved the claims they were mass murdered are false.

Reported for slop.

This is any number of logical fallacies, mainly the Nirvana Fallacy.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nirvana_fallacy

Demanding a meticulously detailed populated list of the resettled Jews, that he himself cannot produce for the very same Jews he is certain that are currently under the soil in the AR camps.

Stop wasting our time with this slop.

[Nessie]

Stubble;

viewtopic.php?p=25798#p25798

Oh, that's already been covered by PoD succinctly in his 'interview/protocols methodology' post.

Memories were 'refreshed' about 'key details' by 'reminding' witnesses via 'other testimony'.

If that was the case, why did they not describe the column and how it worked, in the same way?

[Nessie]

If you proved, by meticulously going through each camp and ghetto, in the way you go into meticulous detail over the Kula column, that millions of Jews were alive in 1944-5, you would have proved the claims they were mass murdered are false.

Reported for slop.

This is any number of logical fallacies, mainly the Nirvana Fallacy.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nirvana_fallacy

How so? If you accuse me of using a fallacy, please explain yourself. It is a fact that you do go into meticulous detail about what the witnesses said about the Kula column and then you refuse to go into any detail about evidence that could prove there were no mass murders.

Demanding a meticulously detailed populated list of the resettled Jews, that he himself cannot produce for the very same Jews he is certain that are currently under the soil in the AR camps.

Stop wasting our time with this slop.

There are meticulous records of the Jews arrested, transported and at what point they vanish from the records. Bad Arolsen, USHMM, Yad Vashem and national archives are where you will find those records. For example, the details of all the Norwegian, Dutch, Belgian, French, German, Austrian and Italian Jew who was arrested and what camps and ghettos they went to. Specific records of individuals are less common in Eastern Europe, when instead, the rounding up of Jews in each community was recorded.

There are transport records of those sent from ghettos and internment camps all over Europe to the AR camps. That is how various sites have been able to produce timelines of arrivals at each camp. The names of dozens of individuals who worked at those camps, or passed through to work at labour camps are also known.

Then there are records of liberations and displaced persons and how many were Jewish. Countries all over the world hold records of Jews who fled and applied for asylum or citizenship, both during and after the war ended. The Swedes have records of all the Danish Jews they sheltered after they fled in 1943.

There are a ton of sources, that you apply meticulous research to, and prove millions of Jews were still alive in 1944 and liberated after the war, which would destroy the claims of mass murder. The reason why you do not want to apply yourself to that, and you would rather pointlessly discuss Kula Columns ad nauseam, is because you erroneously think the Kula Columns are somehow evidence of no mass gassings, and you know that if you searched for the millions you claimed were not killed, you would have to admit there is no evidence of them alive.

[Keen]

There are meticulous records of the Jews arrested, transported and at what point they vanish from the records...
There are a ton of sources, that you apply meticulous research to, and prove millions of Jews were still alive in 1944 and liberated after the war, which would destroy the claims of mass murder.

Logical fallacy.

nessie:

I am both a trained historian and police officer.

A mass grave is defined as a grave containing multiple human corpses, or the remains of multiple people.

* * * * *

nessie, how many actual mass graves did CSC actually prove actually exist within the boundary of the Treblinka II camp?

nessie's answer:

12 - G32, G29, G1, G44, G4, G38, G36, G50, G51, G52, G53, G54.

[But] I cannot show graves [At T II].

Geophysics scientifically and conclusively proves that there are pits and that they exist.

But it DOES NOT prove that those pits contain human remains.

I cannot physically show you mass graves [At T II].

nessie, if you can't show us mass graves at T II, then what are you showing us here:

nessie:

Photos of TII, from the 1945 surveys, showing the site after grave robbing activity

Isn't digging into graves the very definition of "grave robbing activity"?

nessie:

A mass grave is defined as a grave containing multiple human corpses, or the remains of multiple people.

Where is the proof that these bones are actually from humans / people?

Why are there no skulls?

[Keen]

nessie:

A mass grave is defined as a grave containing multiple human corpses, or the remains of multiple people.

nessie:

The 2011 geophysical site survey [at T II], found cremated remains on the surface of the ground, during walk over surveys, which were correctly reburied.

So that means that the hole that Colls dug to rebury the remains she discovered during her fraudulent "investigation" is a grave / mass grave.

So why don't you show us that?

nessie:

I cannot show graves.

I cannot physically show you mass graves.

Liar.

See the additional "huge mass grave" dug by Colls to bury all the fraudulently alleged cremated remains that she found during her "investigation" of Treblinka II here: (Watch from the 38:20 mark to the 41:58 mark and from the 1:08:07 mark to the 1:08:40 mark.)



And why didn't you show us F-16????



Or the "monument grave"?