nessie:
"Are you suggesting that because I cannot physically show you mass graves, where 800,000 corpses can be individually counted, such as the mass graves at Katyn, that means I cannot prove mass graves?"
It is not a "suggestion" - it is a fact that you "cannot prove mass graves."
All your allegations of doing so are bald faced lies.
If you want to pretend that you have "proven" mass graves, then;
Why are you so afraid of telling us what standard of "proof" you are alleging?
Arranged from lowest to highest, the standards of proof in American law follow a rough hierarchy:
Reasonable suspicion: Enough specific facts to justify a brief police stop, but well short of what’s needed for an arrest or a search warrant.
Probable cause: A fair probability that a crime occurred or evidence will be found, sufficient for an arrest or warrant.
Substantial evidence: Enough that a reasonable person could accept it as adequate, used when courts review agency decisions.
Preponderance of the evidence: More likely than not, the default for most civil lawsuits.
Clear and convincing evidence: Highly probable, reserved for civil matters with serious consequences like fraud claims or termination of parental rights.
Beyond a reasonable doubt: Firm conviction of guilt, required for all criminal convictions.
Absolute certainty: A state of knowledge or proof so complete that there is no possibility of doubt or uncertainty
What are you waiting for nessie?
What are you so afraid of?
We know that your alleged standard of "proof" is not only less than a "preponderance of the evidence," but less than substantial evidence as well.
And how do we know that?
Because you are unable to claim the following reward:
A - $100.00 reward - is being offered for each one of the 100 alleged “scientifically proven” mass graves / cremation pits in question that is proven -
with the same standard of proof applied in U. S. civil courts - to actually exist and to currently contain the remains of - at least 2 people. (That is less than one tenth of one one thousandth of one percent of the alleged mass murder.)
https://thisisaboutscience.com/
And you are anable to rebut the following rebuttable presumption:
OPENING / FUNDAMENTAL STATEMENT OF FACT: It is alleged in orthodox historiography that; during WW II, the bodies and burnt remains of hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of Jews were buried in numerous “huge mass graves” at Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II. However, despite all the deceptive, unsubstantiated allegations to the contrary, the truth is, the largest (in terms of quantity of remains) of the 100 graves in question that are fraudulently alleged to have been “scientifically proven” to currently exist at these five sites, in which verified human remains have been uncovered / tangibly located via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented archaeology, contained the remains of -
ONLY SIX PEOPLE.
Note: Using the information presented on this website and applying legal standards used in U.S. courts, the above opening / fundamental statement of fact, which is written as, and can be defined as - a rebuttable presumption - can be -
LEGALLY - ACCEPTED - AS - TRUE - in a U.S. court.
https://thisisaboutscience.com/
