The find of the remains of a building, that had been demolished and buried, does indeed only prove there was a building there and that it was demolished and buried.
The find of large areas of disturbed ground, pits, ash, cremated remains and human bones, proves that a lot of digging took place and that people were cremated and buried.
A genuine investigator, would then gather evidence to establish how that building and the remains came to be there, who was responsible and what took place. You deniers are not genuine investigators.
How so? Quote me and prove that I do not understand the difference. Testimony means a statement by someone, often in a legal context. Testimony is one of the many forms of evidence. Eyewitness statements are their testimony and that is a type of evidence. It is the best form of narrative evidence, as it covers events over time, providing context.You repeatedly show that you do not understand the difference between evidence and testimony.
When eyewitnesses state a gas chamber was located in one part of a camp and mass graves in another, and surveys find the remains of the building and pits and buried human remains, the physical evidence corroborates their testimonial evidence. We now have context, evidence of what the building was used for and why there are buried, cremated human remains.
