nessie's ever evolving Treblinka II lies

A containment zone for disruptive posters
Post Reply
K
Keen
Posts: 1582
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

nessie's ever evolving Treblinka II lies

Post by Keen »

First, the lying POS said this:
nessie:

A mass grave is defined as a grave containing multiple human corpses, or the remains of multiple people.

nessie, how many actual mass graves did CSC actually prove actually exist within the boundary of the Treblinka II camp?

nessie's answer:

12 - G32, G29, G1, G44, G4, G38, G36, G50, G51, G52, G53, G54.


All the mass graves dug by the Nazis, and the corpses they cremated, are still at the AR camps.

Mass graves are proven. By all normal standards of evidencing, they are proven.
As well as this:
I can point to them in the ground.

No matter what the claim is, the burden of proof is on the claimant.

I have never had any issue with accepting the burden of proof.

There is no circumstance in which I reverse the burden of proof.

If you make a claim, it is up to you to prove it. If I make one, it is up to me.
But then, the lying POS was forced to admit this:
nessie:

Geophysics scientifically and conclusively proves that there are pits and that they exist.

But it does not prove that those pits contain human remains.
And now, the lying POS is claiming this:

nessie:
I have spent many posts discussing archaeological surveys of the AR camps that have found large areas of disturbed ground containing buried, cremated remains.

It is a denier lie to minimise the sheer volume of evidence.

The 2011 geophysical site survey, [at T II] found cremated remains on the surface of the ground, during walk over surveys, which were correctly reburied.
So let's see if the lying POS will actually accept its burden of proof:
A - $100.00 reward - is being offered for each one of the 100 alleged “scientifically proven” mass graves / cremation pits in question that is proven - with the same standard of proof applied in U. S. civil courts - to actually exist and to currently contain the remains of - at least 2 people. (That is less than one tenth of one one thousandth of one percent of the alleged mass murder.)

Note: The 6 original fraudulently alleged “huge mass graves” of Treblinka II that were alleged by “authoritative eyewitnesses” and allegedly - “PROVEN” - to exist in the early show trials - MODEL - MAP - (but never proven to exist), are also included in the above reward offer. (A photo of one of these 6 fraudulently alleged “huge mass graves” can be seen - HERE.)

Also note: This reward offer, as it applies to Treblinka II, can also be claimed for each 14 pounds of cremains discovered - ANYWHERE - within the camp boundary.

https://thisisaboutscience.com/
What are you waiting for nessie?

What are you so afraid of?
Last edited by Keen on Tue Jul 07, 2026 7:43 pm, edited 4 times in total.
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
K
Keen
Posts: 1582
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: nessie's ever evolving Treblinka II lies

Post by Keen »

The lying POS cannot prove that the remains of so-much-as two people have ever been discovered within the boundary of Treblinka II!

Image

And not so-much-as one tooth!

Out of an alleged 29 million!!!

If the physical evidence for an alleged crime that - HAS TO EXIST - for the crime to have

actually happened - DOES NOT EXIST - then the alleged crime obviously - DID NOT HAPPEN.

Ergo: The orthodox “pure extermination center” story is - A PROVEN, NONSENSICAL BIG-LIE.
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
K
Keen
Posts: 1582
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: nessie's ever evolving Treblinka II lies

Post by Keen »

nessie:
The 2011 geophysical site survey, [at T II] found cremated remains on the surface of the ground, during walk over surveys, which were correctly reburied.
Watch the following video from the 37:40 mark to the 42:40 mark.

In it, the lying pig Colls agrees to collect and rebury all the human remains that she discovers.



So why have we never been told what the quantity / volume of bone fragments discovered was?

Or what size of a "grave" was dug to handle all the human remains found?

Or the location of where they were allegedly buried?
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
Post Reply