

Poppycock! The ADL pushes anti-White hatred, not Western imperialism. But I suppose Emmaia Gelman's Jewishness explains that flawed demonstration and her "failure" to see what the ADL is really about.DavidM wrote: ↑Thu Jun 11, 2026 5:01 pm Emmaia Gelman’s new book, The Anti-Defamation League and the Racial State, is a history of the group, framing it not as a racial justice organization but as a deputy sheriff for the US empire. Gelman shows how the ADL crafts a narrative for the public that pushes Western imperialism rather than equality.
Wetzelrad wrote: ↑Fri Jun 12, 2026 12:05 am Gelman made a recent livestream appearance, here, to discuss her book with what appears to be a radical leftist group. At timestamp 13:55, Gelman says the ADL is "a white supremacist organization", which she then spends the next 24 minutes trying to support.
This is a really transparent attempt to remove Jewish-ness from the ADL and instead ascribe its poor behavior to White people.






Yea, no shit, ask a fucking Rhodie.
--Greenblatte ProllyBut, but, it's ok when we do it goy!
I don't need to ask a Rhodie. Some Chosenites and their Masonic buddies have already turned my homeland into a district of their Global Zimbabwe to a large extent.



Did your parents lack the nerve to tell you about it or did they just lack the knowledge to tell you about it?



Yes, but it's a race against time...




I see a HUMONGOUS hypocrisy and double-standard there in Rockwell’s rhetoric — one based imho on arrogant ignorance.
I’m not demonising your ancestors.
Q1: TrueQ1. Do you admit your white ancestors were settlers who were not invited in?
Q2. Do you admit they eventually gave rewards for scalps of the indigenous people?
Q3. Do you admit that they stole land from the indigenous people by force and made and broke numerous ‘treaties’ made to the natives under the guise of peaceful co-existence.
Q4. Can you admit that what jooze are doing NOW in the middle east is what white people successfully did in north America ober the preceding three centuries.
Q5. Is The indigenous native population the majority of the US population?
Q6. If not what percentage is it?
Q7. Do you concede that America was the predominant destination for the transatlantic slave trade?
Q8. Do you acknowledge that whites in America for two centuries owned more other people as right-less, slaves treated as sub-human — per capita than any other white populations worldwide?
Not to mention the fact that the unintentional introduction of diseases in America (a deplorable part of the Columbian Exchange) decimated Native Americans because they lacked immunity against those new diseases, causing a demographic collapse which wiped out an estimated 80% to 95% of the Indigenous population. That unintentional demographic disaster can't be called a genocide by any standards. Intent matters. And intent is the central part of the definition of genocide.Stubble wrote: ↑Sun Jun 14, 2026 1:42 pm This will be my second time hitting this finer detail of history with you.
When the asiatic's flooded this continent, they boiled the White people who came here before them in pots. There was a total genocide of the White settlements.
By contrast, when the Whites came to settle the Americas in the 1500's and beyond, they specifically did not engage in genocide. Resettlement is not genocide. Many other solutions were tried first, and resettlement was not the first option. Ultimately, the native population in what came to be The United States ended up in reservations and there are more of them than at any other point in human history. If you are going to call that a 'genocide' it was the least successful genocide in human history.
I am sick and so very tired of people parroting convenient narratives to demonize my ancestors, who did more to bring humanity forward than any other group to roam this rock.
People hate the White man, and slander him endlessly, but boy do they all wish to live among us.