- Have pathetic thresholds for corroboration
- Dont understand how to read an inventory sheet
- Dishonestly invoking a deus ex machina to force a narrative
- Brazenly lying & attempting to manipulate those less familiar with the events
- All of the above
Absolute slop as always
Two eyewitnesses describe the same item, with both being specific about it being located in the gas chamber. A document also describes the same item in an inventory, but it appears to list it in a different room. But all three locate it inside the same building. The discrepancy can be simply explained as a mistake in the inventory, no need for a deus ex machina. I have lied about nothing, with quotes from both witneses and a link to the document.
You are seriously stretching credibility, claiming that there is no corroborative evidence for the columns. If the type of evidence used here, was used for something that you were happy to accept, you would declare there is corroboration. If two Jews and a document described a mesh column that was used for improved ventilation inside a Krema corpse store, you would accept that as corroborating evidence, without any problems!
Something hand written on a typed inventory sheet detailing the one thing you want to assume is something else being in the wrong location is not evidence that something described differently by everyone who claims to have interacted with it being placed in a different location you fucking retard.
Holy fuck.
Last edited by Stubble on Fri Jun 05, 2026 4:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
If I were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
Two eyewitnesses describe the same item, with both being specific about it being located in the gas chamber. A document also describes the same item in an inventory, but it appears to list it in a different room. But all three locate it inside the same building. The discrepancy can be simply explained as a mistake in the inventory, no need for a deus ex machina. I have lied about nothing, with quotes from both witneses and a link to the document.
You are seriously stretching credibility, claiming that there is no corroborative evidence for the columns. If the type of evidence used here, was used for something that you were happy to accept, you would declare there is corroboration. If two Jews and a document described a mesh column that was used for improved ventilation inside a Krema corpse store, you would accept that as corroborating evidence, without any problems!
Something hand written on a typed inventory sheet detailing the one thing you want to assume is something else being in the wrong location is not evidence that something described differently by everyone who claims to have interacted with it was placed in a different location you fucking retard.
Holy fuck.
The document locates the object in the same building as the witnesses, in a room next to the one the witnesses describe. No wonder you get abusive, when that minor discrepancy is all you have to claim they all do not corroborate each other.
Sanity Check - "Thus, currently revisionists can console themselves by affirming their incredulity..."
Nessie wrote: ↑Fri Jun 05, 2026 4:16 pm
Two people describe the same object and locate it in the same building as a document that is describing the same object. Corroboration.
Two unsubstantiated allegations do not confirm a thing.
When "revisionsists" continue to use the word "corroboration" they are just playing nesserto's game.
WHY???
Confirm and support are two different words.
If you mean confirm, then use the fucking word.
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
Nessie wrote: ↑Fri Jun 05, 2026 4:18 pm
No wonder you get abusive, when that minor discrepancy is all you have to claim they all do not corroborate each other.
Two unsubstantiated allegations do not confirm a thing, and they have zero evidentiary value, even if they are exactly the same.
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
Nessie wrote: ↑Fri Jun 05, 2026 4:18 pm
No wonder you get abusive, when that minor discrepancy is all you have to claim they all do not corroborate each other.
Two unsubstantiated allegations do not confirm a thing, and they have zero evidentiary value.
2 disparate allegations do not even support one another, and, a receipt for another thing assigned to another room doesn't support either unsubstantiated allegation.
If you interview 2 people and ask them what Bob had for breakfast and one says oatmeal and is very specific about the bowl, the consistency of the oatmeal and describes the spoon with a specific length, tilt and width, and the other person says he ate cereal with a spork, and gives similar specific details, and then you find a receipt for bacon and eggs, that doesn't mean that everyone corroborated each other, especially if the receipt is for a separate table.
For fucks sake.
If I were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
