Wetzelrad wrote: ↑Fri May 29, 2026 12:40 am
...
Sure, but sometimes playing along is a useful exercise. This forum exists partly as a public proof of the correctness of our ideas. For that to work, it is necessary to be the more reasonable party. Characters like Nessie help with that by constantly being wrong.
If I am wrong, then so is every historian and anyone else who has investigated the Holocaust, by gathering evidence to establish a chronology of events and what happened to the Jews in Europe under Nazi occupation.
Your ideas are wrong, because you cannot evidence them. You argue, rather than evidence there were no gas chambers. I do not think you even know how to go about evidencing there were no gas chambers.
You piss ignorant retard, are you legitimately going to post that you have never been wrong, like, actually, factually incorrect and pivot to 'the mainstream is right' to cover your ass as you say you have never been demonstrably wrong?
You are, actually going to fucking do that?
You get ragdolled fucking constantly for being wrong. As an example, '56 Olympic Swimming Pools'....
If I were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
Wetzelrad wrote: ↑Fri May 29, 2026 12:40 am
...
Sure, but sometimes playing along is a useful exercise. This forum exists partly as a public proof of the correctness of our ideas. For that to work, it is necessary to be the more reasonable party. Characters like Nessie help with that by constantly being wrong.
If I am wrong, then so is every historian and anyone else who has investigated the Holocaust, by gathering evidence to establish a chronology of events and what happened to the Jews in Europe under Nazi occupation.
Your ideas are wrong, because you cannot evidence them. You argue, rather than evidence there were no gas chambers. I do not think you even know how to go about evidencing there were no gas chambers.
You piss ignorant retard, are you legitimately going to post that you have never been wrong, like, actually, factually incorrect and pivot to 'the mainstream is right' to cover your ass as you say you have never been demonstrably wrong?
You are, actually going to fucking do that?
How is gathering evidence to establish a chronology of events and what happened to the Jews, wrong? The Holocaust has been investigated in the same way every other historical event has and Wetzelrad states that is wrong.
You get ragdolled fucking constantly for being wrong. As an example, '56 Olympic Swimming Pools'....
In 1945, the Poles reported an area of 2 hectares, that at one point they excavated down to 7m, where they found cremated human remains mixed in with the earth. That has a volume equivalent to 56 Olympic sized swimming pools. It is the part of the camp witnesses state the main mass graves were located. It is the part of the camp the 1944 aerial photo shows as disturbed ground. Those are all evidenced facts.
Sanity Check - "Thus, currently revisionists can console themselves by affirming their incredulity..."
Nessie wrote: ↑Fri May 29, 2026 6:39 am
Which is not how to investigate, because opinions are usually biased and opinions are like arse holes, everyone has one. Holocaust revisionist opinion is particularly biased and untrustworthy.
One of the most obnoxious things about you is how you pretend like your (frankly stupid) opinions are not opinions.
Nessie wrote: ↑Fri May 29, 2026 6:58 am
In 1945, the Poles reported an area of 2 hectares, that at one point they excavated down to 7m, where they found cremated human remains mixed in with the earth. That has a volume equivalent to 56 Olympic sized swimming pools. It is the part of the camp witnesses state the main mass graves were located. It is the part of the camp the 1944 aerial photo shows as disturbed ground. Those are all evidenced facts.
Can you please stop lying about this? They did NOT excavate 2 hectares to a depth of 7m. That is a lie which have repeated over and over. They excavated only a few pits.
Nessie wrote: ↑Fri May 29, 2026 6:39 am
Which is not how to investigate, because opinions are usually biased and opinions are like arse holes, everyone has one. Holocaust revisionist opinion is particularly biased and untrustworthy.
One of the most obnoxious things about you is how you pretend like your (frankly stupid) opinions are not opinions.
Have you any examples of me pretending an opinion is not an opinion?
Sanity Check - "Thus, currently revisionists can console themselves by affirming their incredulity..."
Nessie wrote: ↑Fri May 29, 2026 6:58 am
In 1945, the Poles reported an area of 2 hectares, that at one point they excavated down to 7m, where they found cremated human remains mixed in with the earth. That has a volume equivalent to 56 Olympic sized swimming pools. It is the part of the camp witnesses state the main mass graves were located. It is the part of the camp the 1944 aerial photo shows as disturbed ground. Those are all evidenced facts.
Can you please stop lying about this? They did NOT excavate 2 hectares to a depth of 7m. That is a lie which have repeated over and over. They excavated only a few pits.
I said they reported an area, that "AT ONE POINT", they excavated down to 7m. The "at one point" clearly indicates that the entire area was not excavated to 7m, it was only once, in one excavation, that they went that deep.
Sanity Check - "Thus, currently revisionists can console themselves by affirming their incredulity..."
