More remedial education for Nessie

A containment zone for disruptive posters
K
Keen
Posts: 1381
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: More remedial education for Nessie

Post by Keen »

Nick Terry:
Everyone making a claim has to substantiate it.
Yes, it's called the burden of proof.

That's your remedial education for today roberto.

Or should I call it your "special education" retardo?
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
K
Keen
Posts: 1381
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: More remedial education for Archie

Post by Keen »

Is it - True. - or - False. - that; Non-nefarious diggings for such things as garbage pits, cellars, wells, latrines, septic pits, etc. - were dug at Treblinka II - ??

Nessie's answer:

True
roberto:
Geophysics scientifically and conclusively proves that there are pits, G32, G29, G1, G44, G4, G38, G36, G50, G51, G52, G53, G54 and that they exist. But it does not prove that those pits contain human remains.
Also roberto:
A mass grave is defined as a grave containing multiple human corpses, or the remains of multiple people.
Also roberto:
The Nazis were not trying to magically disappear the corpses and the graves.

All the mass graves dug by the Nazis, and the corpses they cremated, are still at the AR camps.

Mass graves are proven. By all normal standards of evidencing, they are proven.

I can point to them in the ground.
Also roberto:
Proof, from multiple sources of corroborating evidence, has been produced.
Also roberto:
It is perfectly reasonable to question a claim and ask it to be evidenced.
Nick Terry:
Everyone making a claim has to substantiate it.
Let's see the proof that one mass grave actually exists within the boundary of the Treblinka II camp.

One mass grave roberta.

One.
Nesserto, of the 15 alleged Treblinka II graves / cremation pits in question - the one that you can conclusively prove currently contains the most human remains is number: _?_.

Nesserto's answer:

I don't know.
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
K
Keen
Posts: 1381
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: More remedial education for Nessie

Post by Keen »

roberta:
How about you defend and explain your position?

viewtopic.php?p=23486#p23486
Image

Says the pathological liar who cravenly runs away every time she is challenged to defend her unsubstantiated allegations about the fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" at Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II.
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
Post Reply