Spoiler
SanityCheck wrote: ↑Thu Feb 19, 2026 11:01 am
Incorrect. Revisionism's 'testable predictions' aren't in fact fully quantifiable for reasons noted in this thread and earlier, by Roberto Muehlenkamp. The 'testable predictions' lead nowhere, since they then imply a hypothesis (deported Jews found elsewhere, alive or dead), which has in turn failed to be corroborated, and is thus falsified on your terms. The implied hypothesis cannot be quantified, either, since neither Mattogno nor yourself will explain what % of the deportees actually ended up dead, buried and then cremated at the AR camps, and how this then helps point to where the remaining % of the deportees ended up. So the entire argument ends up zapping the deportees from the historical record all the same.
Moreover, when restricted as it usually is to blethering about Treblinka and Belzec, this leaves approximately 4 million victims of the Holocaust which aren't explained by the 'testable predictions', calling into question why those camps should be anomalies. When extended to Sobibor and Chelmno, this still leaves 3.6 million not dealt with by the argument, and already one runs into serious problems from the revisionist perspective trying to explain away Chelmno. Adding in non-Jewish victims which overlap elsewhere to a significant degree, and there's an even greater explanatory deficit.
The holocaust of bullets numbers are looking pretty inflated too, like Auschwitz, but, diving in to that distracts from some of the most in depth archeological research we've got. What we have indicates inflated death tolls by at least an order of magnitude.
That's an indicator of a pattern. 2,000,000 went to 84,000 at majdanek. 4,000,000 went to 1,100,000 at Auschwitz etc. These rolls even appear to be inflated, still greatly inflated at Auschwitz. The evidence doesn't support the claim.
I get that you aren't going to actually look for where they went and that you are not interested in correcting the mistakes of your peers with regard to their source laundering. I understand that you are content with the established historiography and that you consider it proven beyond a doubt.
I caution you that you are wrong and that the very bedrock of your historiography is not rock at all, but sand, that just blows away when given even the slightest scrutiny.
I encourage you to reflect upon the literature and the tangible evidence and to consider that the history as it has been written doesn't even meet with the integrity taught to high schoolers about journalism.
Yes, 80 years is some time. That isn't sufficient reason for the community to legitimately know more about an ancient roman village and how it operated than about Sobibor. Compare the pictures to the maps and early history as told to you. I don't think the chicken coop in the 'extermination area' was a gas chamber Sir.
In short, I feel that we are all, including yourself, owed history that reflects reality, not fables about piles of dead jews spread across half a continent, murdered in ironic and ridiculous ways (sardine method, diesel exhaust).
