Controlled opposition — aka ‘jewish’ infiltration

Bringing some objectivity to the history of the Chosen People
Locked
User avatar
Wahrheitssucher
Posts: 685
Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 2:51 pm

Controlled opposition — aka ‘jewish’ infiltration

Post by Wahrheitssucher »

.
I just posted something over on the Kirk-killing topic-thread that it is barely more than a hint of the ACTUAL scale of this particular topic.
(Here: viewtopic.php?p=21636#p21636 )

I am referring to the topic of both secret and blatantly open infiltration of all sides of any: political system; of controversial issues; of debates; of movements antagonistic to jewish power and to jewish influence, etc., etc.

Jewish collectives have become over decades masters of infiltrating and then steering diametrically opposed movements.

It has been called ‘controlled opposition’.

In politics it means that whoever gets into positions of power or popularity they can be either taken over and steered or destroyed from within.

Jewish-zionist infiltration into Corbyn’s Labour Party fiasco and election sabotage is one recent example. AND the sabotage of his new ‘your party’ is another. Jews infiltrated both partys; they bribed and blackmailed people; they sabotaged from within (both secretly and openly) and expelled any and all opponents to their machinations

Jewish infiltration and control of both Democratic and Republican parties and of all Presidential candidates in the USA is another example.

Gilad Atzmon is another highly possible example of this phenomena.
He appears to live a very comfortable life, can travel freely, gets books easily published, etc., etc. Yet no non-jewish person promoting and publishing his views would be allowed to get away with that.
Think about that for a moment to see if you think that is accurate.
He disclosed his ‘cloven feet’ when he virulently attacked Corbyn and used his influence to make sure Corbyn didn’t get elected UK PM when that became a very close thing.

I suspect Noam Chomsky is another example of the same. Chomsky grew up on Israeli kibbutzes. He has been very critical of the corrupt western system but notice how when evidence of Israeli involvement in 911 was presented to him in public he rapidly resorted to Israeli propaganda mode.

I notice Mike Enoch Peinovich has been invited to speak at the Armreg HolyH conference.
He appears to me to be yet another example of the same thing. I.e. he appears to be a jewish infiltrator for ‘controlled opposition’.
This article is Part 2 of an ongoing series about the TRS scandal. See also: Part 1.

Kind of like some kind of political equivalent of a K-R&B song about how a man just keeps lying so much that there is always another layer of lies beneath his first layer of lies, Michael ‘Enoch’ Peinovich of ‘The Right Stuff’ has been lying on a whole different level beneath the presently-existing lies.

However, rather than contemplating the fun concept of trolling with musical metaphors, I want you to instead follow me on a journey into the other barrel beneath the barrel that TRS had already sunk to the bottom of.

Welcome to Part 2 of the ongoing drama.

The present situation
So far, Michael ‘Enoch’ Peinovich and his supporters have been frantically trying to channel all the discussions about his standing in the western ethno-nationalist scene toward his Jewish wife, Ames Friedman, as though the problem is confined only to her and as though the perniciousness and hypocrisies of these revelations can be mitigated by simply removing her from the situation through divorce. They have been resolutely ignoring the manifest high likelihood of Peinovich himself being Jewish, at least through his father’s side.

In a recent Rebel Yell podcast, Peinovich subtly referred to himself as a person of ‘mixed Jewish ancestry’. At 01:19:06 of that podcast, he said:
"I think that in these, in cases like this, you've really, you've got to, you've got to just, you know. I mean, there's an absolute purist stance which is like, 'they're simply not allowed', in which case I have to go. And there's the stance that could look at this with, like, 'okay, let's look at this as an individual case and see what the actual individual case is?'"
- Michael 'Enoch' Peinovich
But while people were grappling with that revelation, there is another secret lurking behind that.

As it turns out, Peinovich is additionally Jewish through his mother’s side.
Seriously. This is actual reality. This is really happening.
Read that sentence again, and consider the implications of it.

Peinovich is around and about 75% Jewish at least.

What we now know
Utilising the information that the first doxxing was able to dredge up, we were able to use that information to pivot across various branches of his family, including his siblings, but the most important link is that of his birth-mother.

Michael ‘Enoch’ Peinovich’s father is Michael P. Peinovich. Peinovich senior is married to Billie Gleissner, but we have not taken the time to deeply examine Gleissner, because Gleissner is not Michael ‘Enoch’ Peinovich’s birth-mother. Rather, Gleissner is his step-mother.

Michael ‘Enoch’ Peinovich’s father and his step-mother Billie Gleissner married each other in 1983. So who then, is Peinovich’s birth-mother?

We discovered that Michael ‘Enoch’ Peinovich’s birth-mother is Paula Sippel. Prior to 1983 she was known as Paula Enockson Peinovich-Sippel, her surname through her mother’s side is Enockson. That is the maternal name, which is likely the source of the nickname ‘Enoch’ which Michael ‘Enoch’ Peinovich is using literally in plain view.

Sometimes it’s the thing which is in plain view which paradoxically garners the least attention.

Two plus two is four
We know that Michael ‘Enoch’ Peinovich’s father gets the name Peinovich from a Russified and Americanised variant of the Croatian name Pejnovic, and that the name is associated with Jewish demographies in Croatia.

We also know that Peinovich’s father married twice, and that in both cases he married women with Jewish surnames: Paula Enockson Peinovich-Sippel, and Billie Gleissner.

Additionally, we know that Peinovich’s mother carries the name Enockson through her own mother’s side of their family.

And then, to top it all off, Michael ‘Enoch’ Peinovich ‘accidentally’ married a Jewish woman himself, Ames Friedman, the woman who is now at the centre of this recent Alt-Right scandal along with Michael ‘Enoch’ Peinovich.

Even the most sceptical people, in their heart of hearts, in their intuition, they know that there must be something there. There’s something. But they won’t admit it to themselves. Is it because of a cult of personality?

“How dare you speak the truth!?”
The most popular narrative among the sobbing defenders of Peinovich is that the people who are most viciously attacking TRS in the wake of this scandal, are people who have something to gain from bringing down TRS. Okay, sure.

Let’s be real here. TRS, the ‘inner party’, and the Alt-Right leadership core all got caught covering up a massive den of hypocrisy and money-grubbing deception at TRS, and they piled lies on top of lies within lies.

Michael ‘Enoch’ Peinovich had absolutely laughably ineffective OpSec, and as such it was possible to get his personal information and to discover everything about the fraud he was perpetrating. It was also possible to pivot across his family tree because his whole family maintained an ostentatious social media presence which could be easily dredged in the aftermath of the doxxing.

If you get caught doing something that you’re not supposed to be doing, and there is a good strategic reason for me to amplify the exposure of that scandal, then I will amplify it.

The ‘purity spiral’ meme
The TRS crowd desperately wants to call all of this ‘purity spiralling’ and thereby they hope to place a lid on the ongoing scandal.

I don’t call it ‘purity spiralling’. I call it ‘actually tackling the problem of Jewish subversion’.

https://majorityrights.com/weblog/comme ... l_21012017
A ‘holocaust’ believer’s problem is not technical, factual, empirical or archeological — their problem is psychological.
W
Wetzelrad
Posts: 547
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2025 6:35 am

Re: Controlled opposition — aka ‘jewish’ infiltration

Post by Wetzelrad »

Controlled opposition is obviously a real phenomenon, but accusations of this kind are made too recklessly.

You've suggested that I could be controlled opposition because I reject the belief that Charlie Kirk was killed by Israel. My rejection of your belief should not be off limits. Charlie Kirk in his own words said "I love Israel", "I'm very pro-Israel", "my whole life I have defended Israel". You can make your case to the contrary, but to take the extra step of labelling me as an infiltrator for disagreeing with you is intemperate.

I don't listen to Mike Peinovich and have no knowledge of his ancestry, but the case as presented seems to be that he is "75% Jewish" because his relatives have "Jewish surnames". In fact all of those names are normal gentile names. Pejnovic is Slavic. Sippel and Gleissner are German. This author "Kumiko Oumae" is lying about basic facts to jewjacket others.

Mike Peinovich's reputation is primarily that of being the anti-Jew guy. From what I've been exposed to, that reputation is fully deserved and those views of his have never come across as insincere in any way.

I suggest that if the end result of your worldview is that the most countersemitic people are actually Jews in disguise while the most philosemitic people are secretly working against the Jews, then you have become politically toothless. I suppose this is where I'm supposed to suggest that you are controlled, but I don't actually believe that.
Online
User avatar
Archie
Site Admin
Posts: 1431
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2024 6:54 am

Re: Controlled opposition — aka ‘jewish’ infiltration

Post by Archie »

This forum is for discussing historical topics, not spreading unsourced allegations about so-and-so being secretly Jewish or a Fed or whatever.
Incredulity Enthusiast
Locked