There is not evidence that Hitler made ANY attempt to conquer the world from Germany, so the notion he would have done so from Britain and other White nations is even more absurd. Whatever his vision of how the world would (or even should) ultimately progress due to the course of Nature, which he emphasized as the reason, is not necessarily aligned with what he acted upon as a head of state in practice (note the peaceful prosperity and intra-national focus throughout the 1930s).fireofice wrote: ↑Thu Jan 08, 2026 11:32 amA distinction needs to be made here between the foreign policy of Germany as a country, and the foreign policy of the white race as a whole. The passage in question would include not just Germany, but Britian and all the other white countries as well. So this isn't him claiming he specifically wants Germany to rule the world, but Aryans. This would not tell us anything about his foreign policy as it relates to other white countries. He continued to hold this view of white domination over non-white countries throughout his life. For example, he lamented when Japan retook British colonies. That and more similar pieces of evidence can be found in this video:Callafangers wrote:Even if Hitler believed in this world vision in the early 1920s, it did not seem to drive his policy in foreign relations, especially in peacetime. The only credible instances we find in claims of conversations around blatant conquest come from those of Russian/Soviet territory which was regarded as illegitimate under a hostile Jewish-Bolshevik regime. Many claims were made of Germany's supposed 'conquest' initiatives during the war (such as attempts to conquer the Americas) which were proven false.
Jews, on the other hand, are subverting global nations in practice, torturing citizens through psychological, financial, degeneracy, globalism, and warmongering schemes. These are real actions which affect hundreds of millions of lives right now, present-day.
The video you provided makes much ado about Hitler's lack of "trust" of non-White groups while minimizing the reality of their involvement in the Wehrmacht. The issue, however, is that this employment of non-Whites happened at all, and not on an accidental or trivial scale (multiple non-White nations enlisted, across regions and contexts). Uniforms and reasonable rations and equipment were provided, showing these members were valued. More importantly, these non-Whites in uniform apparently had some reason to believe in the cause, themselves. Why would they believe in genociding themselves? Stockholm syndrome? They were not simply coerced into these positions -- they enlisted and were accepted into the ranks. Obviously, amid rampant subversion, Germany exercised this openness with caution, but it was present nonetheless and starkly at-odds with perceptions of fictional-mainstream Hitler as a stomping toddler who viewed non-Whites as so disgusting to never let them 'disgrace' a German uniform.
This whole question of "was Hitler racist" is ridiculous. Hitler did not think about non-White races. They were not anywhere within his sphere of concern nor interest; there is no moral nor political dilemma he faced which entailed non-White peoples, basically ever. Germany was ~99% White, with the remaining ~1% being Jews, and some fraction of a percent being anything else.
This lack of concern or interest in other races is evident in the fact that there were no laws which discriminated against Black people specifically in Germany, despite Blacks in many instances living there for the duration of the war. These people were often treated well. The only major counterexample I am aware of (sterilization of Blacks) was a local initiative, summarized as follows:
More discussion here: https://archive.codohforum.com/20230609 ... =2&t=12342With regard to claims of general or anti-black 'racism', critics of National Socialism will point almost exclusively to the 1937 sterilization campaign targeting the so-called "Rhineland Bastards" -- approximately 385–600 mixed-race children who resulted from the French-imposed occupation by African colonial soldiers in the Rhineland territory after World War One, where the soldiers were permitted by the French administration to terrorize the population, including rape of German women, resulting in mixed-race children; some relationships, of course, may have been consensual. Given the nature of this imposition and total impunity of African soldiers upon the German population by the French was clearly an attempt to humiliate, demoralize, etc., Germany and its citizens (like the many other postwar humiliations, e.g. the Versailles treaty), conversations surrounding measures against these mixed offspring had been taking place since the Weimar era (i.e. pre-Hitler). Notably: the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity, and Eugenics (KWI-A), which provided pseudoscientific justification via its studies of these children, conducted its key examinations (1937–1938) before its director had even joined the NSDAP, and the sterilizations were carried out legally by local Hereditary Health Courts under the broad criteria of the 1933 Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring, with no definitive evidence of explicit high-level authorization from the Reich Ministry of the Interior or top Nazi leaders. In other words, a local bureaucratic overreach, not a top-down Nazi anti-Black genocide.
This Black woman, Esther Fordham, lived in Hamburg, Germany throughout all of WW2 and never experienced any 'racism', had a peaceful life there (this is her statement despite the interviewer repeatedly trying to get her to say otherwise):
There is also the very-real fandom surrounding Jesse Owens, who was a massive hit in Germany, treated far better than he ever was in the USA (by his own account; could stay at any hotel/restaurant, welcomed everywhere; compare to the US segregation at the time), right in the peak NS era. Here he is signing autographs for a bustling crowd of German fans:
- gettyimages-3014042.jpg (207.28 KiB) Viewed 231 times
Here is an alleged paraphrase from Hitler, per Bormann:
- 1453285108881.jpg (43.6 KiB) Viewed 231 times
- 1401605076112.jpg (108.7 KiB) Viewed 231 times
The man speaking above is Franck Zanu, here is his biography:
Here is a transcript of the above video/interview:Franck “Zanu” Adjisegbe is different. He is intense, explosive, analytical and deeply thought provoking. He is a life-coach, inspirational speaker, and human development consultant. [...]
He is a US citizen born in the Republic of Benin, West Africa. He has worked as a reporter for the New York Tribune and photojournalist for the Washington Times stationed in South Korea, Japan, Malaysia, Bulgaria and other African countries.
https://www.zanuproject.com/about
Obviously, Hitler's conclusions about White superiority were not entirely baseless and the case could be made that these observations of Aryan superiority were the most rational interpretation overall, by any group. Hitler expressed his disdain for Slavs despite their White-ness after having visited their region and witnessing a total absence of modern civilization, social order, etc. And on the other hand, he spoke of the far East (e.g. China, Japan) as having a remarkable history, worthy of respect. Hitler gave credit where it was due but only insofar as the cumulative result of a nation's production and cultural development. He did not believe the aboriginals in Australia or other disorganized, primitive tribes could ever achieve what Germans were already presently doing, and had been doing for centuries. Even today, there is no proof he was wrong -- we simply assume all people/tribes are equal, despite a great deal of evidence pointing directly to the contrary (e.g. IQ distribution data, self-evident performance disparities).ZANU: Okay, yeah, but why do you keep saying "White supremacist"? So, let me ask—maybe it's a grammar thing—when you say "White supremacist," what do you mean?
GUEST: A group of people who believe that they are superior to any other race.
ZANU: So what does it mean when you repeat "White supremacist"? What does it mean?
GUEST: That’s a good point. [laughter]
ZANU: Are you affirming what they have said? Because it has happened in my own tribe. We know very well—in the Mugabe district of the Benin Republic, the Abomey tribe—they found that the women warriors are powerful. Okay? My father's tribe, my mother's tribe—we're weaklings, okay? When they come, we bow and say, "Take, take, and go away." So we began to call them—in a language you call here something like the "hooligans"—we made these names, these hooligans, because of what they do. We thank the French; when they finally arrived, that was the only time they tamed them. So it's the same thing. When you watch the behavior of White people—what they have done—yes, you can make a name for them. But what you're doing is affirming: if these people can go out and colonize successfully for years, and nobody ever succeeded in colonizing them; if these people can go out and take over countries and buy slaves and hold them down—well, they must be good. Well, that's what I was brought up in Africa to believe: that Whites are superior. It is my people who told me, not a White man. I see it is my mom, my dad, my uncles, my community members, my teachers in Africa. Ask any Nigerian, ask any Beninese, ask any Togolese—unless they are lying. Anybody above the age of 50 knows: in our folklore, in our music, we play it. Go and listen to Chalamanda: "When I was a young boy, I want to go to America" [singing]. They tell us that is a land of superior people. It's in my language; I can say it: "yo vo lu dahe." Anybody who can understand Benin will tell you what I've just said, and they've heard it before. So when I arrive here, my people have already told me that White people are superior. But the things they have seen—airplanes flying—they said it's magic. Ships floating on the water—they said it's magic, okay? So all these inventions—television came—that, no, we say "yo vo lu dahe." Any time a radio is turned on and speaking, they say "the White person is from far"— "yo vo lu dahe." When we see a toy that can walk, we say "the White man is so good, he's like God; he has done everything but put blood in a toy." That is what we say in Africa. Everybody knows what I'm saying. Do you know what they say in Ashanti land? The Ashantis have a saying—I can speak Ashanti—[spoken in Ashanti, then translates:] "If you are going to church and you meet a White guy, turn around and go home—you've seen God!"
So, "White supremacist" was created by us to describe something we're confused about.
GUEST: So you're saying that Black folks created that name "White supremacist"?
ZANU: That's correct—from Africa. From Africa, because we are just amazed by the things they've done well. We describe them always by inventions. When you take a toy and the toy is talking and it's moving—like "oh my God"—because, yes, my people are not sophisticated, you know.
GUEST: Why would we call a White person a "White supremacist" if, you know, well, I guess I think it's because we were enslaved.
ZANU: No, it is just observing the mere industrialization of their environment, which we haven't done. That's all. They can command water from far away, through tubes, into their bedrooms. We can't even fetch a bucket of water from the next lake—you will be drowned. They can put electricity; we never had one in Africa. They have airplanes fly over us. It's amazing. Everything they've done is the reason my people say "these people are superior"—not because of slavery. They came to colonize us, and they brought things we have never seen before. They gave a king a mirror, and he was dancing and sold his people away. They brought guns we have never seen—"boom!"—and kill somebody right away. You know what they used to do in the Congo, right? They put dynamite in the rocks, and then they hide; they switch, and then when they point their finger—go "boom!"—and still today they call the White man "kiboom," the sound of the dynamite, and then they [Africans] go down and they go like this [bowing]. If they're not superior, why do you see every picture—when the White man arrived in Africa, we're bowing to them? The Portuguese, in my hometown, Gele, ordered his people: as soon as the Portuguese showed up, everybody was bowing. We have never seen a gun kill a human being. We have never seen a mirror. We have never seen a radio tune in and somebody is speaking from England—the Queen's voice. So for us, all these things: these people must be really superior and close to God. They used to have a joke in Ghana that when God said "let's pray," the White man opened his eyes—the Black people were covering their eyes—so the White man saw how God created the world. That's why they are so good at what they do. And I'm telling you, these are folklores from which we grew up. If anyone told you that White people came to Africa to tell us they're superior, it's a lie—they never said that.
For Hitler to truly believe in the supreme destiny of his people shows his loyalty and confidence in them. If I am a die-hard Manchester United (football/soccer) fan, I might believe my team is superior in all ways to the other teams. That doesn't mean I hate the other teams, just that mine is superior. Better yet, if I believe my own family and bloodline is superior to my neighbors', and even that my family is destined to outrank my neighbors' family perpetually, this doesn't mean I intend to steal from my neighbor, only that I will succeed where he does not. The question of trampling over sovereign borders is another than any belief in "superiority", and it is Jews who have committed infinitely more 'trampling' than Hitler ever attempted.
Hitler is not the problem today.
ATTENTION NICK FUENTES 