Auschwitz Birkenau and the blob

For more adversarial interactions
Post Reply
F
Fred Ziffel
Posts: 231
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2024 11:02 am

Auschwitz Birkenau and the blob

Post by Fred Ziffel »

Blob at Crem 2 or 3 gas chamber
I was working on another project concerning Crem 1 building and I came across this video.
Link to video:

Stop video at 2:09-2:10 on full screen or just believe me. Have you ever seen this view from the sky this close up albeit a bit grainy?

See attached

I submitted an edited and unedited version of 2:09-2:10 of video. I will submit more photos drawings, or you can watch video to understand the size of the roof compared to 70cm x 70cm box ceiling hole.
Focus on the blob at the area of the gas chamber. My placement of the alleged gas chamber may not be perfect, but it is very close.

The take-away here is I see a huge blob, I do not see a 70cm x 70cm box mounted to the roof for that Kula thingy. No lines, no corners, not even blurred indications of a hole in the roof or box, Compare the size of that blob to the size of the roof of just ½ this building width. The distance to roof and to blob in the grand scheme of things is not all that different from this vantage point. Compare to the other blobs to the left of the alleged gas chamber.

How big of a hole do you need to pour 5mm gypsum pellets into a hole? I say a 4-inch diameter pipe will do the job just fine as I stated in past postings.
What do you see? What is your input? Is this blob what I should be seeing as a Kula Thingy hole from this photo? Could this be a closeup of a CIA ruse that blurs as you home in?

Kula collum specs at alleged gas chamber: 70cm x 70cm
Crem Chimney opening specs: 80cm x 120cm
The next 3 post I will submit more images to accompany this posting
Attachments
bir and shadow.JPG
bir and shadow.JPG (121.52 KiB) Viewed 36 times
here.JPG
here.JPG (129.02 KiB) Viewed 36 times
wyw.JPG
wyw.JPG (175.72 KiB) Viewed 36 times
Last edited by Fred Ziffel on Sat Dec 27, 2025 4:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
I do not believe anything one is not allowed to question
F
Fred Ziffel
Posts: 231
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2024 11:02 am

Re: Auschwitz Birkenau and the blob

Post by Fred Ziffel »

more supporting material
Attachments
drawing of ceiling idea.JPG
drawing of ceiling idea.JPG (24.15 KiB) Viewed 30 times
yteyeerty444.JPG
yteyeerty444.JPG (246.56 KiB) Viewed 34 times
fdgyjyje.JPG
fdgyjyje.JPG (80.32 KiB) Viewed 34 times
Last edited by Fred Ziffel on Sat Dec 27, 2025 4:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
I do not believe anything one is not allowed to question
F
Fred Ziffel
Posts: 231
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2024 11:02 am

Re: Auschwitz Birkenau and the blob

Post by Fred Ziffel »

last of supporting materials
end
Attachments
compare 2.JPG
compare 2.JPG (118.76 KiB) Viewed 34 times
Compare 1.JPG
Compare 1.JPG (82.69 KiB) Viewed 34 times
I do not believe anything one is not allowed to question
User avatar
Cowboy
Posts: 55
Joined: Thu May 29, 2025 9:30 pm

Re: Auschwitz Birkenau and the blob

Post by Cowboy »

The frame in the video looks like a close-up of this image that was released by the CIA.
ABAir.jpg
ABAir.jpg (163.84 KiB) Viewed 26 times
It seems fairly obvious that the "Zyklon-B Vents" in both Crematoria II and III were added to the picture using some sort of marker. You can see the "blob" on Crema II in this image. The holes in Crema III are so poorly drawn on that it's almost unbelievable that they published it. There's a great presentation done by John Ball on air photos. He talks about the Auschwitz air photos at around the 22:00 mark but I think the whole thing is a great watch. Hopefully that helps with your inquiry

Sometimes I stood there thunderstruck.
W
Wetzelrad
Posts: 454
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2025 6:35 am

Re: Auschwitz Birkenau and the blob

Post by Wetzelrad »

Fred Ziffel wrote: Sat Dec 27, 2025 3:54 am Have you ever seen this view from the sky this close up albeit a bit grainy?
Maybe not, but it's of nearly the same quality as the one in Air-Photo Evidence. It's the aerial photo of August 25, 1944. Open your copy to page 93 (Link) for the best close-up.

If you go through pages 90-92 you can see how Crematoria II and III appeared on numerous dates that photos were taken, from 1943 to 1945 (Link).

The chimney marks you call blobs are actually more distinct on this date than on other dates where they appear. The author discussed them more specifically on pages 64-65 (Link). He also concluded that they were the wrong size and shape and angle and were possibly faked.

Notably, almost all of the analysis of these photos came before Pressac and other defenders seized upon the idea of Kula columns, so I don't think anyone has attempted to claim that Kula columns are visible in them, just the chimneys that they would theoretically be attached to.

Your comparison to the scale model is good. Something so small could not cast such a giant shadow.
Post Reply