The strict-coupling between the questions of "What happened to the deportees" and "What was the purpose of T-II" is something I reject. They are separate questions, although they may be related. If the deportees were "sifted through the camps of General Government" then it's not necessarily true they all step foot in T-II in the first place. The existence of T-II is explained without the assumption that all of those deportees ever walked inside T-II in the first place.
Nessie, do you admit that in the many documents pertaining to "Reinhardt" at Auschwitz, it explicitly denoted:
Personnel involved in the economic operation
Facilities involved in the economic operation at Kanada-II
Operations pertaining to property delousing/sorting/storage
Did NOT refer to the extermination operation you claim was at Birkenau
What I have described is the mainstream position! They just take a wildly contradictory view of what Reinhardt denoted in GG whereas I am saying it denoted the same in both.
"Not being a real Zyklon B chimney doesn't make it a fake Zyklon B chimney."
PrudentRegret wrote: ↑Sat Nov 15, 2025 5:26 pm
The strict-coupling between the questions of "What happened to the deportees" and "What was the purpose of T-II" is something I reject.
Of course you do, you need to, to make your hypothesis work for you. No historian, or other investigator, would do what you do. The so-called revisionists who have tried to evidence what TII was used for, have also not de-coupled what happened to the people and the property. You are truly unique.
They are separate questions, although they may be related. If the deportees were "sifted through the camps of General Government" then it's not necessarily true they all step foot in T-II in the first place. The existence of T-II is explained without the assumption that all of those deportees ever walked inside T-II in the first place.
Nessie, do you admit that in the many documents pertaining to "Reinhardt" at Auschwitz, it explicitly denoted:
Personnel involved in the economic operation
Facilities involved in the economic operation
Operations pertaining to property delousing/sorting/storage
Did NOT refer to the extermination operation you claim was at Birkenau
I have already made it clear, that you cherry-pick the evidence relating to property theft, sorting and selling. The AR camp personnel all came from T4, so they were not picked for "economic" reasons. No AR document refers to killings, instead, there was a specific reference to secrecy.
The sneering by Nessie of any evidence that he doesn't like and wants to ignore and have removed from any record book or discussion is palpable at the very least.
I have come to the conclusion that he is a paid agent. Probably with Nick Terry too though at the moment he has a strange bedfellow in the history department of Exeter University who goes by the name of Illan Pappe. Must make for odd coffee time conversations if they talk at all.
Nessie as we have seen for a very long time doesn't care about facts, logic and evidence if they don't support his narrative and engineered outcomes to the holocaust story. The fact that most normal people can easily see right through the history and official story of the holocaust in general and Treblinka as a very good case in point flies right over his strange little head. He needs to earn a living somehow so a regular cheque from israel is welcome though the money actually comes from the US.
Never use the word 'debate' and Nessie's name in the same sentence because it ain't going to happen. He is a provocateur pure and simple and will go to his death bed suffering from two strange delusions; firstly that the holocaust of 6m jews actually happened and nothing will change his mind and second not understanding that his extreme case of Trump Derangement Syndrome could so easily have been treated.
Of the four million jews under German control, six million died and five million survived!
borjastick wrote: ↑Sun Nov 16, 2025 9:34 am
The sneering by Nessie of any evidence that he doesn't like and wants to ignore and have removed from any record book or discussion is palpable at the very least.
What evidence is that? Name the eyewitness, document, physical, archaeological or circumstantial evidence that I supposedly ignore and want removed.
I have come to the conclusion that he is a paid agent. Probably with Nick Terry too though at the moment he has a strange bedfellow in the history department of Exeter University who goes by the name of Illan Pappe. Must make for odd coffee time conversations if they talk at all.
Nessie as we have seen for a very long time doesn't care about facts, logic and evidence if they don't support his narrative and engineered outcomes to the holocaust story.
So-called revisionists are unable to produce a chronological, evidenced revised history of the camp. It is they who do not care about facts, logic and evidence.
The fact that most normal people can easily see right through the history and official story of the holocaust in general and Treblinka as a very good case in point flies right over his strange little head. He needs to earn a living somehow so a regular cheque from israel is welcome though the money actually comes from the US.
Never use the word 'debate' and Nessie's name in the same sentence because it ain't going to happen. He is a provocateur pure and simple and will go to his death bed suffering from two strange delusions; firstly that the holocaust of 6m jews actually happened and nothing will change his mind and second not understanding that his extreme case of Trump Derangement Syndrome could so easily have been treated.
