Privacy recommendations

A revisionist safe space
Post Reply
A
Alonso
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat May 31, 2025 5:11 am

Privacy recommendations

Post by Alonso »

In a recent thread I was advised against publishing personal information in this forum. I didn't publish anything like my phone number, of course, but I did reveal some general information, like my country of origin and some non-identifying information about my personal life.

I don't know what to think about this. I'm painfully aware of the ordeals that people like Robert Faurisson or Germar Rudolf have experienced, it's clear that people like them are well advised to take every measure they can to protect their safety and their privacy. However, I'm not sure that that applies to the rest of us. In the topic of the holohoax (and in many other topics related to online security and privacy) I believe that my best protection is my sheer irrelevance. I'm a revisionist in the sense that I know the truth about the holohoax, but my participation in the field of revisionism is limited to the posts I have published in this and similar forums. As much as I admire Rudolf and the others, I don't share their goal of revealing the truth to the world. I'm not a member of a revisionist organization and I don't intend to become one in the foreseeable future.

Therefore, it would be stupid for any Zionist organization to take any action against me, simply because any action they could take would have a cost, and they wouldn't get anything in return. I don't threaten their power or their money in any way. Apart from that, I don't think that I can actually take any effective measures to protect my privacy. The Zionists who want to silence us control the most advanced technological systems in the world. If they want to know who I am, they know already. If they wanted to hurt me, they would have hurt me already. If they haven't done so yet is not because they haven't identified me yet, it's because they don't care about people like me. I don't even bother using tools like Tor or VPNs because I feel that that would be like wearing a bulletproof vest against a nuke.

In that light, it feels like there's no need to take any privacy measures here beyond the standard basic measures I take anywhere else on the internet. I think that even if I published here my full name, phone number and postal address, they still wouldn't care. They would just store the information in some database where it would simply lie for decades without anyone ever being remotely interested in using it.

What do you think? Do I understand the situation properly or am I missing something?
W
Wetzelrad
Posts: 316
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2025 6:35 am

Re: Privacy recommendations

Post by Wetzelrad »

It's up to you. I agree with your assessment that the biggest names get targeted most heavily. For example there have been recent attempts to dox Thomas Dalton. Also StoneToss. But you should bear in mind that there are also examples of seemingly unimportant activists being harassed and character assassinated for reasons like this. Here are some examples.
  • Canary Mission is an Israel-based doxing organization which targets young professionals to try to deny them employment. Most of its targets are anti-Zionists, but a good number of them are noted for making insufficiently deferent comments about the Holocaust. The Trump admin then used Canary Mission to select targets for deportation:
    https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=64981
  • A similar organization is TECAH, which intends to crawl social media sites and create a "Hate Offender List" which they want to be akin to sex offender lists.
    https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=64304
  • StopAntisemites is another organization which attempts to dox and deny employment to anyone they deem antisemitic, including those that don't believe in the Holocaust Narrative. Even Home Depot employees are a target.
    https://twitter.com/StopAntisemites/sta ... 5220677633
  • Someone sent "doxing trucks" around some universities to try to shame and repress anti-Zionist students, labelling them all antisemites.
    https://www.columbiaspectator.com/news/ ... -columbia/
  • Candace Owens, despite having pretty conventional views about the Holocaust, was labelled a "Holocaust denier" and even temporarily banned from New Zealand for acknoledging that one of the Mengele stories was a fabrication.
A
Alonso
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat May 31, 2025 5:11 am

Re: Privacy recommendations

Post by Alonso »

Thank you for your answer. When I thought about possible backslash from participation in this and similar forums I hadn't considered black lists. Nobody is going to bother sending a group of thugs to beat me up while I walk in the park, like they did to Robert Faurisson, I'm not important enough. However, black lists are a different story. Black lists allow Zionists to target thousands of people in one go in a cost-effective way. With that approach, it doesn't matter how irrelevant the targets are, what matters is how many people are targeted. Targeting thousands at the same time is worth the investment, no matter how irrelevant each individual target might be.

Still, I wonder whether that makes any difference in terms of how we should approach protecting our privacy. Right now I'm using Google Chrome on my Windows PC to write this post. My messages to this forum are being delivered by my ISP with the help of several other intermediary companies. Microsoft and Google are well known for their Zionism and their constant spying on their users, and the same is probably true of the other companies involved in the process. Combined, they probably know more about me than I know myself.

With that in mind, whether I publish information that could possibly be used to identify me, like my country of origin, seems irrelevant. If they want to know who I am, they already do. If they want me to be in their black lists, I'm already there. That suggests that the only way to protect myself would be to simply not publish this kind of messages. And it's a bit late for that, I've published a few dozens already (here and elsewhere).
Post Reply